Kalkınma ve Kadın (Veya Toplumsal Cinsiyet) İlişkilendirilenişinin Değişimindeki Kavşaklar
Bu çalışma, kalkınma ile kadının (veya toplumsal cinsiyetin) ilişkilendiriliş pratikleri ve anlayışlarını "1970 öncesi", "70'ler", "80'ler" ve "90'lardan günümüze" şeklinde dönemlere ayırarak, bu dönemlerdeki etkin yaklaşımlar temelinde, incelemeye çalışmaktadır. Bu yaklaşımlar ilgili yazında her ne kadar "Kalkınmada Kadın", "Kadın ve Kalkınma", "Yeni bir Çağ için Kadınlarla Kalkınma Alternatifleri", "Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Kadın", "Kadın, Kültür ve Kalkınma" v.b. kronolojik olarak belirli dönemlere ait kılınsa da kesin dönemsel ayrımlara gidilmesi oldukça zordur. Batı orijinli feminist kalkınma yaklaşımlarında önceleri kadın-erkek eşitsizliği daha sonra da toplumsal cinsiyet temelli eşitsizlik üzerinde durulmuştur. Fakat bu yaklaşımların 'kültür' ve 'kimlikler'i göz ardı ettiğine ilişkin tartışmalar, Batının kültürel egemenliğine direnişler ve Üçüncü Dünya akademyasının giderek artan ağırlığı kalkınma-kadın (veya toplumsal cinsiyet) ilişkilendirilişinde yeni bakış açılarının ortaya çıkmasına neden olmuştur. Bu ise zaman zaman farklı (ve hatta birbirlerini tümüyle dışlayan) ama çoğu zaman da geçişken ve kesişimsel yeni görüşlerle ortaya konulmuştur.
Crossroads of the Change in the Ways of Relating Development and Women (or Gender)
This study examines the ways of relating development and woman (or gender) on the basis of different periods (70s, 80s and from 90s to today) and with a specific attention to the approaches that are evident in each of these periods. Even though approaches such as "Women in Development", "Women and Development", "Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era", "Gender and Development", "Women, Culture and Development", etc., in the related literature chronologically embodied to a specific periods, it is hard to make a clear chronological distinction among them. At first, feminists with Western origin at the beginning emphasized the inequality of men and women and later the gender inequality in development perspectives. However, with the rise of the discussions about these perspectives' ignorance on 'culture' and 'identities', resistance to the cultural hegemony of the West and with the rising effects of the Third World academics new perspectives were emerged. These were expressed time to time by the opposing (even mutually exclusive), but most of the times by transitional and intersectional new ideas.
___
- AGARWAL, Bina (1995), "Gender, property and the land: bridging a critical gap in economic analysis and policy", in E. KUIPER ve J. SAP (eds.) Out of the Margins: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, London: Routledge pp. 264-294.
- BADEN, Sally, GOETZ, Anne Marie (1998), "Who needs [sex] when you can have [gender]? Conflicting discourses on gender at Beijing" Feminist Visions of Development: Gender Analysis and Policy içinde (der. Cecile Jackson, Ruth Pearson), Routledge, London, ss. 19-38.
- BARRITEAU, V. Eudine (2000), "Feminist Theory and Development: Implications for Policy, Research, and Action", Theoretical Perspectives on Gender and Development içinde (der. Jane L. Parpart, M. Patricia Connely, V. Eudine Barriteau), IDRC Books, Ottawa, ss. 161-178.
- BENERIA ve SEN (1997), "Accumulation, Reproduction and Women's Role in Economic Development: Boserup Revisited", The Women, Gender & Development Reader içinde (der. Nalini Visvanathan, Lynn Duggan, Laurie Nison'off, Nan Wiegersma), Zed Books Ltd., London, ss. 42-51,
- BOSERUP, Ester (1970), Woman's Role in Economic Development, St. Martin's Press Inc., New York.
- BOULDING, Elise (1976), The Underside of History Boulder, Westview Press, Colorado.
- CHUA, Peter, BHAVNANI, Kum-Kum, FORAN, John (2000), "Women, culture, development: a new paradigm for development studies?, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 23, No. 5, ss. 820-841.
- CONNELY, M. Patricia, LI, Tania Murray, MAC DONALD, Martha, PARPART, Jane L. (2000), "Feminism and Development: Theoretical Perspectives", Theoretical Perspectives on Gender and Development içinde (der. Jane L. Parpart, M. Patricia Connely, V. Eudine Barriteau), IDRC Books, Ottawa, ss. 51-160.
- CYPHER, James M., DIETZ, James L. (1997), The Process of Economic Development, Routledge, London.
- DEDEOĞLU, Saniye (2004), "Dünya Ekonomisi ve Hayatta Kalmanın Feminizasyonu", Kalkınma ve Küreselleşme içinde (der. Turan Subaşat, Saniye Dedeoğlu), Bağlam Yayıncılık, İstanbul, ss. 87-111.
- ERTÜRK, Yakın (1996), "Alternatif kalkınma stratejileri: Toplumsal cinsiyet, kadın ve eşitlik", ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 23 (3), 341-356.
- FOLBRE, Nancy (1986), "Hearts and Spades: Paradigms of Household Economics", World Development, Vol. 14, No. 2, ss. 5-40.
- HAYAMI, Yujiro, GODO, Yoshihisa (2005), Development Economics: From The Poverty to the Wealth of Nations, (Third Edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- JAQUETTE, Jane S., STAUDT, Kathleen (2006), "Women, Gender, and Development", Women and Gender Equity in Development Theory and Practice: Institutions, Resources and Mobilization içinde (der. Jane S. Jaquette, Gale Summerfield), Duke University Press: Durham, N.C., ss. 19-52.
- McCLEAN, Maxine (2000), "Alternative Approaches to Women and Development", Theoretical Perspectives on Gender and Development içinde (der. Jane L. Parpart, M. Patricia Connely, V. Eudine Barriteau), IDRC Books, Ottawa, ss. 179-190.
- McILWAINE, Cathy, DATTA, Kavita (2003), "From Feminising to Engendering Development", Gender, Place and Culture, Vol. 10, No. 4, ss. 369-382.
- MOLYNEUX, Maxine (1979), "Beyond the Domestic Labour Debate", New Left Review, No. 116, ss. 3-27.
- MOLYNEUX, Maxine (1985), "Mobilisation Without Emancipation? Women's Interests, the State and Revolution in Nicaragua', Feminist Studies 11: 227-54.
- MOLYNEUX, Maxine (1998), "Analysing Women's Movements", Development and Change, Vol. 29, ss. 219-245.
- MOSER, Caroline O. N. (1989), "Gender Planning in the Third World: Meeting Practical and Strategic Needs", World Development, 17 (11), ss. 1799-1825.
- MOSER, Caroline, MOSER, Annalise (2005), "Gender Mainstreaming since Beijing: a review of success and limitations in international institutions", Gender and Development, Vol. 13, No. 2, ss. 11-22.
- PALAZ, Serap (2005), "Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Kalkınma: Kalkınmada Kadının Yeri", İktisadi Kalkınmada Sosyal, Kültürel ve Siyasal Faktörlerin Rolü içinde, (der. Muhsin Kar, Sami Taban), Ekin Kitabevi, Ankara, ss. 313-335.
- PARPART, Jane (2002), "Lessons from the Field: Empowerment, Gender and Development from a Post-(Post-)Development Perspective", Feminist Development Thought içinde (der. Kriemild Saunders), Zed Books, London, ss. 41-56
- PEARSON, Ruth, JACKSON, Cecile (1998), "Introduction: Interrogating development: feminism, gender and policy", Feminist Visions of Development: Gender Analysis and Policy içinde (der. Cemile Jackson, Ruth Pearson), Routledge, London, ss.1-16.
- PEARSON, Ruth (2005), "The rise and rise of gender and development", Radical History of Development Studies içinde (der. Uma Kothari), Zed Books Ltd., New York, ss. 157-179.
- RAI, Shirin M. (2002), Gender and the Political Economy of Development, Polity Press, Cambridge.
- RATHGEBER, Eva M.(1989), "WID, WAD, GAD: Trends in Research and Practice", IDRC, Ottawa.
- RAZAVI ve MILLER (1995), "From WID to GAD: Conceptual Shifts in the Women in Development Discourse (UNRISD Occasional Paper for the Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing 1995) OP 1, Geneva: UNRISD/UNDP, February.
- SAUNDERS, Kriemild (2002), "Introduction: Towards a Deconstructive Post-Development Criticism", Feminist Development Thought içinde (der. Kriemild Saunders), Zed Books, London, ss.1-38.
- SCOTT, Catherine V. (1996), Gender and Development: Rethinking Modernization and Dependency Theory, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., Colorado.
- SEN, Gita, GROWN, Caren (1987), Development, crises and alternative visions: Third World Women's Perspectives, Monthly Review Press, New York.
- SINGH, Shweta (2007), "Deconstructing 'gender and development' for 'identities ofwomen'", InternationalJournalof Social Welfare, 16, ss. 100-109.
- TINKER, Irene (1997), "The Making of a Field: Advocates, Practitioners and Scholars", The Women, Gender & Development Reader içinde (der. Nalini Visvanathan, Lynn Duggan, Laurie Nison'off, Nan Wiegersma), Zed Books Ltd., London, ss. 33-42.
- UNITED NATIONS, (1996), Platform for Action and the Beijing Declaration, Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, China 4-15 September 1995, UN Department of Public Information, New York.
- VAN WAEYENBERGE, Elisa (2006), "From Washington to Post-Washington Consensus: Illusions of development", The New Development Economics. After the Washington Consensus içinde (der. KS Jomo, Ben Fine), Tulika Books, New Delhi.
- WILLIS, Katie (2005), Theories and Practices of Development, Routledge, Oxon.
- WORLD BANK (1995), Participation Source Book, World Bank Environment Department Papers, World Bank, Washington D.C.
- YOUNG, Kate, (1997a), "Gender and Development", The Women, Gender & Development Reader içinde (der. Nalini Visvanathan, Lynn Duggan, Laurie Nison'off, Nan Wiegersma), Zed Books Ltd., London, ss. 51-54.
- YOUNG, Kate (1997b), "Planning from a Gender Perspective", The Women, Gender & Development Reader içinde (der. Nalini Visvanathan, Lynn Duggan, Laurie Nison'off, Nan Wiegersma), Zed Books Ltd., London, ss. 366-373.