KÜRESEL GELİRDEN PAYI ARTAN ÜLKELERDE TİCARETİN KARBONDİOKSİT EMİSYONLARINA ETKİSİ

Çalışmanın amacı ticaretin karbon dioksit emisyonları üzerindeki etkisini tespit etmektir. Bu amaçla,1995-2014 yılları arası dönemde küresel gelirden payı artan ülkelerin durumu Panel VAR Modelikullanılarak incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre ticaret karbondioksit emisyonlarını olumsuzetkilemektedir. Çalışmada alternatif bir yöntem olarak Karbondioksit Yoğunluğu Endeksi dekullanılmıştır. Bu endeks ülkeler arasında ki kirliliği karşılaştırma imkanı vermektedir.

EFFECT OF THE TRADE TO CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS IN COUNTRIES WHICH INCREASE SHARE IN GLOBAL INCOME

The aim of the study to determine the effect of trade on carbon dioxide emissions. For this purpose, position of in countries which increase share in global income, in the period between 1995-2014, have been examined using Panel VAR Model. According to the results obtained, trade negatively affects carbon dioxide emissions. The Carbon Dioxide Intensity Index was also used as an alternative method in the study. This index allows comparison of pollution between countries.

___

  • Xepapadeas, A. & Zeeuw, A. (1998). Environmental policy and competitiveness: the porter hypothesis and the composition of capital. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37, 165-182.
  • Walter, I. (1974). International trade and resource diversion: The Case of Environmental Management. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 110, 482-493.
  • Walter, I. (1972). Environmental Control and Patterns of International Trade and Investment: an Emerging Policy İssue. PSL Quarterly Review 25(100), 82-106.
  • Tobey, J. A. (1990). The Effects of domestic environmental policies on patterns of World trade: An Empirical Test. Kyklos 43(2), 191-209.
  • Tiwari, A. K. (2011). Comparative performance of renewable and nonrenewable energy source on economic growth and CO2 emissions Of Europe and Eurasian countries: A PVAR Approach. Economics Bulletin 31(3), 2356-2372.
  • Timurlenk, M. S. (1998). Türkiye’de iktisadi dalgalanmaların analizi: bir yapısal VAR modeli uygulaması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 1(2), 55-70.
  • Tarı, R. (2012). Ekonometri. Kocaeli: Umuttepe Kitapevi.
  • Sümer, K. K. (2013). Makroekonometrik modeller. İstanbul: Beşir Kitapevi.
  • Stock, J. H. & Watson, M. W. (2011). Ekonometriye giriş. (Çev. B. Saraçoğlu) Ankara: Efil Yayınevi.
  • Stewart, R. B. (1977). Pyramids of sacrifice? problems of federalism in mandating state implementation of national environmental policy. The Yale Law Journal 86(6), 1196-1272.
  • Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32(8), 1419-1439.
  • Siebert, H., Eichberger, J., Gronych, R., & Pethig, R. (1980). Trade and environment: a theoretical enquiry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
  • Selden, T. & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 147-162.
  • Rezza, A. A. (2013). FDI and pollution havens: evidence from the Norwegian manufacturing sector. Ecological Economics 90, 140-149.
  • Revesz, R. L. (1992). Rehabilitating ınterstate competition: rethinking the “race to the bottom” rationale for federal environmental regulation. NYU Law Rev. 67, 1210-1254.
  • Rassier, D. G. & Earnhart, D. (2010). The effect of clean water regulation on profitability: testing the porter hypothesis. Land Economics 86(2), 329-344.
  • Radetzki, M. (1992). Economic growth and environment. P. Low (Eds.), International Trade and the Environment (pp. 121-135). Washington: World Bank.
  • Radetzki, M. & Tilton, J. E. (1990). Conceptual and methodological issue. J.E. Tilton (Eds.), World Metal Demand: Trends and Prospects (pp. 13-35). New York: Routledge.
  • Potoski, M. (2001). Clean air federalism: do states race to the bottom?. Public Administration Review 61(3), 335-342.
  • Porter, Michael (1995). America’s green strategy. R. Welford & R. Starkey (Eds.), Business and the envonment: a reader (pp. 33-35). Washington: Taylor & Francis.
  • Porter, M. E. & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 97-118.
  • Pethig, R. (1976). Pollution, welfare, and environmental policy in the theory of comparative advantage. Journal of Environmental Economics And Management 2, 160-169
  • Pasurka, C. A. (1985). Environmental control costs and U.S. effective rates of protection. Public Finance Quarterly 13(2), 161-182.
  • Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. International Labour Office (ILO) WP 238, 1-45.
  • Palmer, K,. Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm?. The Journal Of Economic Perspectives. 9(4), 119-132.
  • Murty, M.N. ve Kumar, S. (2003). Win–win opportunities and environmental regulation: testing of porter hypothesis for ındian manufacturing ındustries. Journal of Environmental Management 67(2), 139-144.
  • Mohr, R. D. (2002). Technical change, external economies, and the porter hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43, 158-168.
  • Meadows, D.H. vd. (1972). The limits to growth: a report for the club of rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.
  • Mcguıre, M. C. (1982). Regulation, factor rewards, and international trade. Journal of Public Economics 17, 335-354.
  • Mani, M. & Wheeler, D. (1997). In search of pollution havens? Dırty Industry In The World Economy, 1960- 1995. Workshop on Social and Environmental Consequences of Growth-Oriented Policies, World Bank: Washington.
  • Madsen, P. M. (2009). Does corporate investment drive a “race to the bottom” in environmental protection? a reexamination of the effect of environmental regulation on ınvestment. The Academy of Management Journal 52(6), 1297-1318.
  • Low, P. & Safadi, R. (1992). Trade policy and pollution. P. Low (Eds.), International Trade and the Environment (pp. 29-52). Washington: World Bank.
  • Love, I. & Zicchino, L. (2006). Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 46, 190-210.
  • Lin, L. & Sun, W. (2016). Location choice of fdı firms and environmental regulation reforms in China. Journal of Regulatory Economics 50(2), 207-232.
  • Levinson, A. & Taylor, M. S. (2008). Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International Economic Review 49(1), 223-254.
  • Leonard H. J. (1988). Pollution and the struggle for the world product: multinational corporations, environment, and ınternational comparative advantage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lanjouw, J. O. ve Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy 25, 549-571.
  • Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and ıncome inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
  • Konisky, D. M. (2008). Regulator attitudes and the environmental race to the bottom argument. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2), 321-344.
  • Jänicke, M. (1989). Economic Structure and environmental ımpacts: east-west comparisons. Environmentalist 9(3), 171-183.
  • Jaffe, A. B. ve Palmer, K. (1995). Environmental regulation and ınnovation: a panel data study. NBER Working Paper 5545, 1-42.
  • IMF. (2016). Data mapper, Retrieved January 19, 2016, from http://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/ index.php
  • Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W. & Rosen, H. S. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56(6), 1371-1395.
  • Grossman, G. M. & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental ımpacts of a north amerıcan free trade agreement. NBER Working Papers Series 3914, 1-57.
  • Graham, M. (1998). Environmental protection & the states: «race to the bottom» or «race to the bottom line”?. The Brookings Review. 16(1), 22-25.
  • Frankel, J. (2009). Environmental effects of international trade. Västerås: Globalisation Council.
  • Elmas, Y. (2016). Gelirden payı artan ülkelerde ticaretin karbondioksit emisyonlarına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu.
  • Edgar. (2016). CO2 time series 1990-2014 per region/country, Retrieved May 15, 2016, from http://edgar.jrc. ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2014
  • EC. (1990). Environment and the internal market. Brüksel: European Communities.
  • Doğanay, S. M. Sayek, S. & Taşkın, F. (2014). Is environmental efficiency trade inducing or trade hindering?”. Energy Economics 44, 340-349.
  • Dasgupta, S., Mody, A., Roy, S. & David, W., (2001). Environmental regulation and development: a crosscountry empirical analysis. Oxford Development Studies 29(2), 173-187.
  • d’Arge, C. & Kneese, A. V. (1972). Environmental quality and international trade. International Organization 26(2), 419-465.
  • Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics 48, 71-81.
  • Cao, B. & Sun, Y. (2011). Asymptotic distributions of ımpulse response functions in short panel vector autoregressions. Journal of Econometrics 163, 127-143.
  • Canova, F. ve Ciccarelli, M. (2013). Panel vector autoregressive models: a survey. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.
  • Bozdağlıoğlu, E.Y. & Özpınar, Ö. (2011). Türkiye’ye gelen doğrudan yabancı yatırımların türkiye’nin ihracat performansına etkilerinin VAR yöntemi ile tahmini. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi 13(3), 39-63.
  • Binder, M., Hsiao, C. & Pesaran, M. H. (2005). Estimation and inference in short panel vector autoregressions with unit roots and cointegration. Econometric Theory, 21(4), 795-837.
  • Batrakova, Svetlana ve Davies, Ronald B. (2012). Is there an environmental benefit to being an exporter? Evidence From Firm Level Data. Review of World Economics 148 (3), 449-474.
  • Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment?. The American Economic Review 91(4), 877-908.
  • André, F. J., González, P. & Porteiro, N. (2009). Strategic quality competition and the porter hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57(2), 182-194.
  • Akay, E. Ç., Abdieva, R. & Oskonbaeva, Z. (2015). Yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi, iktisadi büyüme ve karbondioksit emisyonu arasındaki nedensel ilişki: Orta Doğu ve Kuzey Afrika ülkeleri örneği. International Conference on Eurasian Economies, Düzenleyen: Eurasian Economists Association, Kazan.
Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1306-2174
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi