KAMU HİZMETLERİ MOTİVASYONU KURAMI: BİR LİTERATÜR TARAMASI

Çalışanları hangi faktörlerin motive ettiği sorusu hem özel hem de kamu sektörünün kritik konularındanbirisidir. Kamu çalışanlarının yalnızca maddi teşviklerle motive olduğu varsayımına dayananperformansa göre ücret uygulamaları kamu sektöründe tüm dünyada yaygın olarak uygulanmaktadır.Bu uygulamalara alternatif bir yaklaşım olan Kamu Hizmetleri Motivasyonu kuramı kamu çalışanlarınıher durumda kendi çıkarını düşünmeyen, vatanperver, sosyal olarak motive olan bireyler olarak kabuletmektedir. Kamu Hizmetleri Motivasyonu kuramı uluslararası kamu yönetimi literatüründe artan biroranda farklı boyutlarıyla tartışılmasına karşın ülkemizde gündeme fazla gelmemektedir. Çalışma bualandaki çalışmaları özetlemeyi; böylece, kuramı ülkemiz kamu yönetimi camiasının dikkatine sunmayıamaçlamaktadır.

PUBLIC SERVICE MOTIVATION THEORY: A LITERATURE REVIEW

The question of what motivate the employees is one of the critical issues for both public and private sectors.Depending on the assumption that employees are motivated by primarily material incentives, performance- related pay practices have been adopted by public sector in the whole world. As an alternative to thisapproach, Public Service Motivation theory assumes the public sector employees as socially motivatedpatriot individuals who do not always consider his/her self-interest. Although Public Service MotivationTheory has been increasingly discussed in the international public administration literature with differentdimensions, it is still not known much in Turkey. This study aims to make a literature review and; thus, bringattention to the Turkish public administration community on this subj ect.

___

  • Alonso, P., & Lewis, G.B. (2001). Public Service Motivation and Job Performance: Evidence from the Federal Sector. American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 363-380.
  • Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2012). Profiles of Public Service-Motivated Civil Servants: Evidence from a Multicultural Country. International Journal of Public Administration, 35 (1), 5-18.
  • Anderfuhren-Biget, S., Varone F., Giauque D.,& Ritz, A. (2010). Motivating Employees of the Public Sector: Does Public Sector Motivation Matter? International Public Sector Management, 13 (3), 213-246.
  • Aydın, S. (2007). Sağlıkta Dönüşüm Programı ve Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Performans Yönetimi Anlayışına Geçiş. İçinde Ateş H, Kırılmaz H, Aydın S (Eds), Sağlık Sektöründe Performans Yönetimi: Türkiye Örneği (ss. 252-77). Ankara: Asil Yayınları.
  • Balcı, A., & Kırılmaz, H. (2005). Performansa Dayalı Ücretlendirme Sistemleri ve Kamu Sektöründe Uygulanabilirliği: Sağlık Bakanlığında Döner Sermaye Gelirlerinden Performansa Dayalı Ek Ödeme Sistemi. İçinde Nohutçu, A., & Balcı, A. (Eds), Bilgi Çağında Türk Kamu Yönetiminin Yeniden Yapılandırılması– 1 (ss. 169-201). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Bangcheng, L., Ningyu, T., & Xiaomei, Z. (2008). Public Service Motivation and Job Satisfaction in China: An Investigation of Generalisability and Instrumentality. International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 684-699.
  • Barrows, D., & Wesson, T. (2000). A Comparative Analysis of Job Satisfaction Among Public and Private Sector Professionals. The Innovation Journal, 5(1), 1-21.
  • Binderkrantz, A.S., & Christensen, J.G. (2012). Agency Performance and Executive Pay in Government: An Empirical Test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22 (1), 31-54.
  • Bregn, K.. (2013). Detrimental Effects of Performance-Related Pay in the Public Sector? On the Need for a Broader Theoretical Perspective. Public Organization Review, 13 (1), 21-35.
  • Brewer, G.A., & Selden S.C. (1998). Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), 413-439.
  • Brewer G.A., Selden S.C., & Facer II R.L. (2000). Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 254-264.
  • Bright, L. (2008). Does Public Service Motivation Really Make a Difference on the Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions of Public Employees? American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 149-166.
  • Bright, L. (2009). Why Do Public Employees Desire Intrinsic Non-Monetary Workplace Opportunities? Public Personnel Management, 38(3), 15-37.
  • Buelens, M., & Van den Broeck, H. (2007). An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation Between Public and Private Sector Organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 65-74.
  • Camilleri, E. (2006). Towards Developing an Organisational Commitment - Public Service Motivation Model for the Maltese Public Service Employees. Public Policy and Administration, 21 (1), 63-83.
  • Castaing, S. (2006). The Effects of Psychological Contract Fulfilment and Public Service Motivation on Organizational Commitment in the French Civil Service. Public Policy Administration, 21(1), 84-98.
  • Cerase, F.P., & Farinella, D. (2006). Exploration in Public Service Motivation: the Case of the Italian Revenue Service. Paper presented at the the Annual European Group of Public Administration Conference, Milan.
  • Cerase, F.P., & Farinella, D. (2007). Exploration in Public Service Motivation: the Case of the Italian Revenue Service. Public Policy and Administration, 24 (3), 281-308.
  • Ceylan, Z. (2009). Performansa Dayalı Ücretlendirme Modelleri ve Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Sayıştay Dergisi, 74-75, 45-72.
  • Choi, D.L. (2004). Public Service Motivation and Ethical Conduct. International Journal of Public Administration, 8(2), 99-106.
  • Choi, S., Whitford, A.B. (2013). Merit-based Pay and Employee Motivation in Federal Agencies. Issues in Federal Agencies, 63 (November), 1-10.
  • Clerkin, R., Paynter, S., & Taylor, J. (2009). Public Service Motivation in Undergraduate Giving and Volunteering Decisions. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(6), 675-698.
  • Coşkun, S. (2003). Toplam Kalite Yönetimi ve Yönetim Teorisi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 36 (4), 55-68.
  • Coşkun, S. (2011). Stratej ik Yönetim ve Toplam Kalite Yönetimi: Benzerlikler, Farklılıklar ve Kamu Yönetimi için Çıkarımlar. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 44 (2), 43-69.
  • Coursey, D.H., & Pandey, S.K. (2007). Content Domain, Measurement, and Validity of the Red Tape Concept: A Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis. American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 342-361.
  • Crewson, P.E. (1997). Public-Service Motivation: Building Empirical Evidence of Incidence and Effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 499-518.
  • Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Eij k van. C., & Steen, T. (2011, August). Does Public Service Motivation Fit An International Setting. 6th ECPR General Conference,,University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 25- 27.
  • Forest, V. (2008). Performance-Related Pay and Work Motivation: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives for the French Civil Service. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(2), 325-339.
  • Frederickson, G.H., & Hart, D.K. (1985). The Public Service and the Patriotism of Benevolance. Public Administration Review, 45 (5), 547-553.
  • Frey, B.S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out. The American Economic Review, 87(4), 746-755.
  • Horton, S. (2006). The Public Service Ethos in the British Civil Service: An Historical Institutional Analysis. Public Policy Administration, 21(1), 32-48.
  • Jurkiewicz, C.L., Massey, T.K., & Brown, R.G. (1998). Motivation in Public and Private Organizations: A Comparative Study. Public Productivity & Management Review, 21(3), 230-250.
  • Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the Private vs Public sector Managers. Public Personnel Management, 22(3), 391-401.
  • Kim, S. (2006). Public Service Motivation and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Korea. International Journal of Manpower, 27(8), 722-740.
  • Kim, S. (2009). Testing the Structure of Public Service Motivation in Korea: A Research Note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19 (4), 839-851.
  • Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Andersen, L.B., Paolo, C. F., Christensen, R.K., Desmarais, C., Koumenta, M., Leisink, L., Liu, L., Palidauskaite, J., Pedersen, L.H., Perry, J.L., Ritz, A., Taylor, J., De Vivo, P., & Wright, B.E. (2010, June). The Development of an International Instrument to Measure Public Service Motivation: A Research Note. Prepared for presentation at the 11th National Public Management Research Conference at Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY. June 2-4.
  • Knoke, D., & Wright-Isak, C. (1982). Individual Motives and Organizational Incentive Systems. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 209-254.
  • Leisink, P., & Steij n, B. (2009). Public Service Motivation and Job Performance of Public Sector Employees in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 35-52.
  • Lyons, S.T., Duxbury, L.E., & Higgins, C.A. (2006). A Comparison of the Values and Commitment of Private Sector, Public Sector, and Parapublic Sector Employees. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 605-618.
  • Marsden, D., & Richardson, R. (1992). Motivation and Performance Related Pay in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Inland Revenue. London: Center for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Marsden, D., & Richardson, R. (1994). Performing for Pay? The Effects of Merit Pay on Motivation in a Public Service. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32(2), 243-261.
  • Marsden, D. (2004). The Role of Performance-related Pay in Renegotiating the ”Effort Bargain”: The Case of the British Public Services. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, (57)3, 350-70.
  • Moynihan, D.P., & Pandey, S.K. (2007). The Role of Organizations in Fostering Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review. 67(1), 40-53.
  • Naff, K.C., Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does Public Service Motivation Make a Difference? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5-16.
  • Norris, P. (2003). Still a Public Service Ethos? Work Values, Experience, and Job Satisfaction among Government Workers (72-90). İçinde Donahue, J.D., Nye, J.S. (Eds.), For the People: Can We Fix Public Service? Mass.: Cambridge.
  • OECD (2005). Pay-Per Performance in Public Administration. Paris: OECD.
  • Park, S.M., & Rainey, H.G. (2007). Antecedents, Mediators, and Consequences of Affective, Normative, and Continuance Commitment: Empirical Tests of Empirical Tests of Commitment Effects in Federal Agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(3), 197-226.
  • Park, S.M., & Rainey, H.G. (2008). Leadership and Public Service Motivation in U.S. Federal Agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109-142.
  • Parka, S., Berry, F (2014). Successful Diffusion of a Failed Policy: The case of pay-for-performance in the US federal government. Public Management Review, 16 (6), 763-781.
  • Perry, J.L. (1996). Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 197-226.
  • Perry, J.L. (1997). Antecedents of Public Service Motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 181-197.
  • Perry, J.L. (2000). Bringing Society In: Toward a Theory of Public-Service Motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 471-488.
  • Perry, J.L., Engbers, T.A., & Jun, S.Y. (2009) . Back to the Future? Performance-Related Pay, Empirical Research, and the Perils of Persistence. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 39-51.
  • Perry, J.L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Building Theory and Empirical Evidence About Public Service Motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 3-12.
  • Perry, J.L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, R.L. (2010). Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future. Public Administration Review, 70 (5), 681-690.
  • Perry, J.L., & Wise, R.L. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
  • Posner, B., & Schmidt, W. (1996). The Values of Business and Federal Government Executives: More Different than Alike. Public Personnel Management, 25(3), 277-289.
  • Pratchett, L. (1996). Petty Bureaucracy and Woolly-minded Liberalism? The Changing Ethos of Local Government Officers. Public Administration, 74(4), 639-56.
  • Rainey, H.G. (1982). Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16 (4), 288-302.
  • Rainey, H.G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori. Journal of Public Administration- Research and Theory, 10(2), 447-469.
  • Rainey, H.G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1-32.
  • Ray, K., Foley, B., Tsang, T., Walne, D., & Bojorek, Z. (2014). A Review of the Evidence on the Impact, Effectiveness andValue for Money of Performance-Related Pay in the Public Sector. The Work Foundation, Lancaster University, UK.
  • Ritz, A. (2009). Public Service Motivation and Organizational Performance in Swiss Federal Government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75 (1), 53-78.
  • Ryan, R.M., & Deci E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
  • Snyder, M.M., Osland, J., & Hunter, L. (1996). Public and Private Organizations in Latin America: A Comparison of Reward Preferences. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(2), 15-27.
  • Steen, T. (2006). Public Sector Motivation: Is There Something to Learn from the Study of Volunteerism? Public Policy and Administration, 21(1), 49-62.
  • Steij n, A.J. (2006). Carrièrejager of Dienaar van de Publieke zaak: Over Ambtenaren en hun Motivatie [Career Person or Servant of a Public Cause: On Civil Servants and Their Motivation]. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universteit Rotterdam.
  • Steij n, B. (2008). Person-Environment Fit and Public Service Motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 13-27.
  • Taylor, J. (2007). The Impact of Public Service Motives on Work Outcomes in Australia: A Comparative Multi- Dimensional Analysis. Public Administration, 85 (4), 931-959.
  • Taylor, J. (2008). Organizational Influences, Public Service Motivation and Work Outcomes: An Australian Study. International Public Management Journal, 11 (1), 67-88.
  • Tozlu, A. (2014). Kamu Kesiminde Peformans Değerlendirme Sistemi: İş ve Meslek Danışmanlarına Yönelik Bir Uygulama Önerisi. Kalkınma Bakanlığı Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara: Kalkınma Bakanlığı.
  • Vandenabeele, W. (2005). Public Service Motivation binnen de Nederlandse overheid [Public Service Motivation in Dutch Government, İçinde Christen Democratische Verkenningen (259-270), Department of Public Administration Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Vandenabeele, W. (2006). Standing on Perry ’s Shoulders: Developing a Sublic Service Motivation Measurement Scale. Paper presented at the the annual EGPA conference, Milan.
  • Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a Public Administration Theory of Public Service Motivation: An Institutional Approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545-556.
  • Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Towards a Public Administration Theory of Public Service Motivation. Leuven: K.U.Leuven.
  • Vandenabeele, W., Depre, R., Hondeghem, A., & Yan, S. (2004). The Motivational Patterns of Civil Servants. Viesoj i Politika Ir Administravimas, (13), 52-63.
  • Vandenabeele, W., Scheepers, S., & Hondeghem, A. (2006). Public Service Motivation in an International Comparative Perspective: The UK and Germany. Public Policy and Administration, 21(1), 13-31.
  • Vandenabeele, W., & Walle, S. (2007). International Differences in Public Service Motivation: Comparing Regions across the World. In Perry J.L., & Hondeghem, A. (Eds.), Public service motivation : state of the science and art (223-244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Pay for Performance in the Public Sector: Benefits and (Hidden) Costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387-412.
  • Whitener, E.M. (2001). Do ‘High Commitment’ Human Resource Practices Affect Employee Commitment? A Cross-Level Analysis Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. Journal of Management, 27(5), 515-535.
  • Wright, B.E., & Christensen, R.K. (2009 June). Public Service Motivation: Testing Measures, Antecedents and Consequences. Paper prepared for the International Public Service Motivation Research Conference in Bloomington, June 7-9.
  • Wright, B.E., & Grant A.M. (2010). Unanswered Questions about Public Service Motivation: Designing Research to Address Key Issues of Emergence and Effects. Public Administration Review, 5 (5), 691-700.
  • Yung, B. (2014). Differential Public Service Motivation Among Hong Kong Public Officials: A Qualitative Study. Public Personnel Management, 43 (4), 415-441.
  • Zaim, H. (2007). Performansa Dayalı Ücret Uygulanmasının Doktor Memnuniyeti Üzerindeki Etkileri. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 53, 359-374.
Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1306-2174
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi