The Analysis Of EU’s The Western Balkan Enlargement

Enlargement of the European Union is one of most important development not only in European politics but also in the world politics in general. The European Union had accepted ten thirteen new new members from 2004 to 2013 and these new members were mainly consist of Eastern European and Balkan countries (only Malta and Cyprus were exceptions). In this context, the enlargement of the Union to Western Balkans is very important issue which had to be taken into consideration. In this article It is aimed to elaborate the achievements and failures of the EU enlargement strategies in the three Western Balkan countries. It will be analyzed that whether could it be accepted that there is a comprehensive enlargement strategy of EU for Western Balkan countries and why EU enlargement process was culminated in achievement in some countries such as Croatia and Slovenia, but it failed in another countries such as Serbia in the first decade of 21.century. This question will be assessed in line with the two fundamental theories of regional integration namely, rationalist institutionalism and sociological institutionalism. In the research study, it reached that sociological institutionalism provides more appropriate perspective for the purpose of explaining the different results of enlargement strategy in the Balkan countries.o

___

  • Abbott K. W. and Snidal, D. (1998). Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1): 3-38.
  • Arlı, A. (2004). Oryantalizm Oksidentalizm ve Şerif Mardin. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
  • Arman, M. N. (2007). Avrupa Birliği’nin Batı Balkan Genişlemesi: Bir Dış Politika Aracı olarak Kimlik Dönüşümü. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yayınları.
  • Bull, H. (1995).The Anarchial Society: A Study of Order İn World Politics.London: MacMillian.
  • Carrier, J.G. (1992). Occidentalism : The World Turned Upside-Down. American Ethnologist. 19(2): 190-203.
  • Caspersen, N. (2006). Elite Interests and Serbian Montenegrin Conflict. Southeast European Politics, 4(2): 22-43.
  • Checkel, J. (1999). Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe, International Studies Quarterly, 43(1): 83-114.
  • Dietz, T. (1999). Constructing Threat, Constructing Political Order: On the Legistimization of an Economic Community in Western Europe.Journal of International Relations and Development, 2(1):29-49.
  • Duric Dragan, D. (2004). Montenegro’s Prospects for European Integration: On a Twin Track.South-East Europe Review, 4(2): 77-91.
  • Dunne, T. (2006). Analysis of the English School with International Organizations, Journal of Theory and History, 23(2):131-139.
  • Ferguson, N. (2012). Civilization : The Six Killer Apps of Western Power. London:Penguin Books.
  • Fletcher L. E. and Harvey M. Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly, 24(3): 573-639.
  • Hammond, A. (2006). Balkanism in the Political Context . From the Ottoman Empire to EU. Westminister Papers in Communication and Culture, 3(3): 2-22.
  • Kerr,R. (2004). The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: An Exercise in Law, Politics, and Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kulenovic, E. and Petkovic, K. (2016). The Croatian Princes: Power, Politics and Vision (1990-2011). Croatian Political Science Review, 53(4): 105-130.
  • Kut, Ş. (2005). Balkanlar’da Kimlik ve Egemenlik. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Lavenex S. and Schimmelfenning, F. (2006). Relations with the Wider Europe. JCMS, 44(1): 137-144.
  • Maple, R. (2004). Balkan is Beatiful: Balkanism in the Political Discourse of Tudman’s Croatia. East European Politics and Societies, 18(4): 611-634.
  • Moravcsik A. and Vachudova, M.A .(2003). National Interests, State Power, and EU Enlargement. East European Politics and Society, 23(1): 11-45.
  • Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4):473-524.
  • Olsen, J. (2002). Many Faces of Europeanization, Journal of CMS, 40(5): 920-944.
  • Padoan, P.P.(1997). Regional Arregements as Clubs: The European Case, Political Economy of Regionalism, New York: Colombia University Press.
  • Radaelli, C. (2003). The Europeanization of Public Policy. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  • Ron, J. (2003). Frontiers and Ghettos: State Violance in Serbia and Israel. California: California University Press.
  • Said, E. W. (1999).Şarkiyatçılık, Batı’nın Şark Anlayışları. (Çev.: B.Ülner). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Sandler T. and Tschirhart, J. (1980). The Econumic Theory of Clubs, An Evaluative Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 18(4): 481-521.
  • Schimmelfenning, F. (2002).Theorizing EU Enlargement : Research Focus, Hypotheses, and the State of Research, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4): 478-548.
  • Schimmelfenning, F. (2001). The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization,55(1): 47-80.
  • Sedelmeier, U. (2003). Accomodation Beyond Self-Interests : Identity, Policy Paradigms, and Limits of Rational Approaches to EU Policy in Eastern Europe. Politique Europenne,3(3):3-37.
  • Seroka, J. (1978). Prospects for Stability in Post-Tito Yugoslavia. Slavic Review, Volume.37(2):234-269.
  • Stoianıvich, T. (1994). Balkan Worlds: The First and Last Europe. London: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Subotic, J. (2018). Explaning Difficult States, Journal of East European Politics and Societies, 32(1): 8-23.
  • Todorova, M. (2003). Balkanları Tahayyül Etmek. (Çev.:D.Şendil). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Visnja, S. (2003). Croatia’s Preperation for EU Accession.Global Development Network South East Europe, 1(1): 3-21.
  • Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy: What the States Make of It. Journal of International Relations, 5(3): 490-521.
  • Yalova, Y. (2007). Avrupa Birliği Ortak Tarım Politikası ve Türkiye. Ankara: Alp Yayınevi.