___

• Abasi, Al.R. and Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes.7, 221-233.
• Batane, T. (2010). Turnitin to turning to turnitin to flight plagiarism among university students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1-12.
• Betts, R.L., Bostock, J.S., Elder J.T. ve Trueman, M. (2012). Encouraging good writing practice in first-year Psychology students: An intervention using Turnitin. The British Psychological Society, 18(2), 74-80.
• Bruton, S. and Childers, D. (2016). The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism: a qualitative study of faculty view on student plagiarism and turnitin. Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 316-330.
• Buckley, E. and Cowap, L. (2013). An evaluation of the use of Turnitin for electronic submission and marking and as aformative feedback tool from an educator’s perspective. British Journal of Educational Technolog, 44(4), 562-570.
• Carr, R. (2005). Turnitin.com: teachers’ perspectives of anti-plagiarism software in raising issues of educational integrity. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2(3), 94-101.
• Cohen, J. (2010). Using Turnitin as a formative writing tool. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 2, 1-14.
• Davis, M. (2007). The role of Turnitin within the formative process of academic writing. Brooks eJournal of Learning and Teaching,2(2), Web:http://bejlt. brookes.ac.uk/article/the_role_of_turnitin_within_the_formative_process_of_ academic_writing/adresinden 27 Mart 2016 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• DeVoss, D. and Rosati, A.C. (2002). “It wasn’t me, was it?” plagiarism and the web. Computers and Composition, 9, 191-203.
• Draaijer, S. and Van Boxal, P. (2006). Summative Peer assessment using ‘turnitin’ and a large cohort of students: a case study. 10Th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference: Proceedings of the Conference on 4th and 5th July 2006 at Loughborough University. Loughborough University,167-180.
• Heckler, N.C., Rice, Margaret and Bryan, Hobson(2013). Turnitin systems: a deterrent to plagiarism in college classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(3), 229-248.
• Horovitz, J. S. (2012). Two wrongs don’t negate a copyright: don’t make students turnitin if you won’t give it back. Florida Law Review, 0(1), 1-9.
• Howard, R.M.(2007). Understanding “internet plagiarism”. Computers and Composition, 24, 3-11.
• Graham-Matheson, L. and Starr, S. (2013). Is it cheating or learning the craft or writing? Using Turnitin to help students avoid plagiarism. Research in Learning Technology, 21,1-13.
• Goddard, R. and Rudzki, R. (2005). Using an electronic text-matching tool (Turnitin) to detect plagiarism in a New Zealand University. Journal of University Teaching &Learning Practice, 2(3).
• Jenson, J. and De Castell, S. (2004). ‘Turn it in’: technological challenges to academic ethics. Education, Communication & Information, 4( 2-3), 311-330.
• Güngör-Kırçıl, A. ve Karagüler, T. (2007). Ödev kopyacılığında internetin rolü ve önlemler. Akademik Bilişim 07-IX. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri, 31 Ocak-2 Şubat 2007 Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, s.189-192’deki makale
• Köse, Ö. and Arikan, A. (2011). Reducing plagiarism by using online software: an experimental study. Contemporary Online Language Education Journal, 1, 122- 129.
• Ledwith, A. and Risquez, A (2008). Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer-reviewed assigments. Studies in Higher Education, 33,371-384.
• Lucy, R.B, Bostock, S. J., Elder, T. J. andTrueman, M. (2012). Encouraging good writing practice in first-year psychology students: an intervention using Turnitin. Psychology Teaching Review, 18(2), 74-81.
• Marsh, B. (2004). Turnitin.com and the scriptual enterprise of plagiarism detection. Computers and Composition, 21, 427-438.
• Niederhauser, D. S. ve Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 15-31.
• Penketh, C. ve Beamont, C.(2014). ‘Turnitin said it wasn’t happy’: can the regulatory discourse of plagiarism detection operate as a change artefact for writing development? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 95- 104.
• Rees, M. and Emerson, L. (2009). The impact that Turnitin has had on text-based assessment practice. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 5(1), 20- 29.
• Rolfe, V. (2011). Can Turnitin be used to provide instant formative feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 701-710.
• Royce, J. (2003). Has Turnitin.com got it all wrapped up? Teacher Librarian, 30(4), 26- 30.
• Savage, S. (2004). Staff andstudents responses to a trial of Turnitin plagiarism detection software. Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum 2004. 150- 155.
• Sutherland-Smith, Wendy and Carr, Rodney (2005). Turnitin.com: teachers’ perspectives ofanti-plaiarism software in raising issues of educational integrity. Journal df University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2(3),94-101.