___

• Abell, S.K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S.K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp.1105- 1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Acar, Ö., Patton, B. R., & White, A. L. (2015). Prospective secondary science teachers' argumentation skills and the interaction of these skills with their conceptual knowledge. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(9), 132-156.
• Anderson, D. & Clark, M. (2012). Development of syntactic subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science by a generalist elementary teacher. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 315–330.
• Avaamiodou, L. & Zembal-Saul, C. (2005). Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first-year elementary teacher’s specialised practices and knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 965-968.
• Aydeniz, M. & Dogan, A. (2016). Exploring the impact of argumentation on pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 111–119.
• Bailie,A.L.(2017).Developingpreservicesecondaryscienceteachers’pedagogicalcontent knowledge through subject area methods courses: A content analysis. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(7), 631–649.
• Barker, H. L. (2019). The influence of argumentative discourse on pre-service teachers' alternative conceptions of photosynthesis and cellular respiration. Middle Tennessee State University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
• Berland, L. K. & Reiser, B. J. (2011). How classroom communities make sense of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216.
• Berry, A., Depaepe, F., & van Driel, J. H. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 347–386). Singapore: Springer Singapore. Bilgin, N. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik analizi teknikler ve örnek çalışmalar. (2. Baskı). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Bossér, U., Lundin, M., Lindahl, M., & Linder, C. (2015). Challenges faced by teachers implementing socio-scientific issues as core elementsin their classroompractices. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 159-176.
• Barendsen, E. & Henze, I. (2017). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11165-017-9637-z.
• Burek, K. & Zeidler, D. L. (2015). Seeing the forest for the trees! Conservation and activism through socioscientific issues. In M.P. Mueller & D.J. Tippins (Eds.) EcoJustice, citizen science and youth activism: Situated tensions for science education (pp 425-442). Dordrecht: Springer International Press.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F.(2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (5. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
• Capobianco, B. M. (2007). Science teacher’ attempts at integrating feminist pedagogy through collaborative action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 1-32.
• Christensen, B. L., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. (2014). Research methods, design, and analysis, pearson new ınternational edition. (11th ed). Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited.
• Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272.
• Cook, J., Bedford, D., & Mandia, S. (2014). Raising climate literacy through addressing misinformation: Case studies in agnotology-based learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 296–306.
• Donnelly, D. F. & Hume, A. (2015). Using collaborative technology to enhance pre- service teachers’pedagogical content knowledge in Science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(1), 61-87.
• De Jong, O. & van Driel, J. (2004). Exploring the development of student teachers’ PCK of the multiple meanings of chemistry topics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 277–491.
• Demirel, R. (2015). The effect ofindividual and group argumentation on student academic achievement in force and movement issues. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education (JPTE), 11(3), 916–48.
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
• Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., Silfver, E., & Simon, S. (2013). Teachers’experience of working with socio-scientific issues: A large scale and in depth study. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 599-617.
• Evagorou, M. (2011). Discussing a socioscientific issue in a primary school classroom: The case of using a technology-supported environment in formal and nonformal settings. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. Teaching, learning and research (pp. 133–159). New York, NY: Springer.
• Evagorou, M. (2015). Elementary school students’ emotions when exploring an authentic socio-scientific issue through the use of models. Science Education International, 26(2), 240-259.
• Evagorou, M., Guven, D., & Mugaloglu, E. (2014). Preparing elementary and secondary pre-service teachers for everyday science. Science Education International, 25(1), 68-77.
• Evagorou, M. & Puig Mauriz, B. (2017). Engaging elementary school pre-service teachers in modeling a socioscientific issue as a way to help them appreciate the social aspects of science. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 113-123.
• Friedrichsen, P., Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teachingorientations. Science Education, 95, 358–376.
• Geddis, A. N. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 673–683.
• Gess-Newsome, L. & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers' knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Education, 77, 25–45.
• Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J.A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2017). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 1–20.
• Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction(4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Goodnough, K. (2010). Teacher learning and collaborative action research: Generating a “knowledge-of-practice” in the context of science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(8), 917–935.
• Gökbulut, Y. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının geometrik cisimler konusundaki pedagojik alan bilgileri. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Gunckel, K. L. (2013). Teacher knowledge for using learning progressions in classroom instruction and assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
• Holbrook, J. & Rannikmäe, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 4, 275–288.
• Juhler, M. (2018). Pre-service teachers’reflections on teaching a physicslesson: How does lesson study and content representation affect pre-service teachers’ potential to start developing PCK during reflections on a physics lesson. NORDINA, 14(1), 22-36.
• Karahan, E. & Roehrig, G. (2016). Use of socioscientific contexts for promoting student agency in environmental science classrooms. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(2), 425 – 442.
• Karisan, D. & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics. Science and Technology, 5(2), 139-152.
• Kıryak, Z. & Çalık, M. (2017). Improving grade 7 students’ conceptual understanding of water pollution via common knowledge construction model. International Journal of Science and Mathematıcs Educatıon, 2(1), 1-22.
• Kind, V. (2019). Development of evidence-based, student-learningoriented rubrics for pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 911-943.
• Klosterman, M. L. & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043.
• Klosterman, M., Sadler, T., & Brown, J. (2012). Science teachers’ use of mass media to addresssocio-scientific and sustainability issues. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 51-74.
• Kowalski, P. & Taylor, A. K. (2009). The effect of refuting misconceptions in the introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 153–159.
• Kuhn, D. & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescent's thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552.
• Lambert, J. L. & Bleicher, R. E. (2017). Argumentation as a strategy for increasing preservice teachers’understanding of climate change, a key globalsocioscientific issue. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 101-112.
• Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Zeidler, D.L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953.
• Lee, Y. C. & Grace, M. (2012). Students’ reasoning and decision making about a socioscientific issue: A cross-context comparison. Science Education, 96(5), 787–807.
• Lee, H. S., Liu, O. L., Pallant, A., Roohr, K. C., Pryputniewicz, S., & Buck, Z. E. (2014). Assessment of uncertainty-infused scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 581-605.
• Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio- scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224.
• Levinson, R. & Turner, S. (2001). Valuable lessons: Engaging with the social context of science in schools. London: The Wellcome Trust.
• Loughran, J., Mulhall, P. and Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370–391.
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Martín-Gámez, C. & Erduran, S. (2018). Understanding argumentation about socio- scientific issues on energy: a quantitative study with primary pre-service teachers in Spain. Journal Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 463- 483.
• Morris, H. ( 2014). Socioscientific issues and multidisciplinarity in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1137–1158.
• Mueller, M. P. & Zeidler, D. L. (2010). Moral–ethical character and science education: Ecojustice ethics through socioscientific issues (SSI). In D. Tippins, M. Mueller, M. van Eijck, & J. Adams (Eds.), Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of ecojustice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems (pp. 105–128). New York: Springer.
• Muğaloğlu, E. Z., Doğança Küçük, Z., & Güven, D. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs to teach socio-scientific issues. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 95-110.
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Nilsson, P. & Karlsson, G. (2019). Capturing student teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) using CoRes and digital technology. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 419-447.
• Orland-Barak, L. (2014). Mediation in mentoring: A synthesis of studies in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 180–188.
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
• Ottander, C. & Ekborg, M. (2012). Students’ experience of working with socioscientific issues—a quantitative study in secondary school. Research in Science Education, 42, 1147–1163.
• Özden, M. (2015). Prospective elementary school teachers’ views about socioscientific ıssues: a concurrent parallel design study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 333-354.