___

• Bahry, L. M. (2012). Polytomous item response theory parameter recovery: an investigation of nonnormal distributions and small sample size (Master’s Thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. MR90146)
• Cohen, A. S., Kim, S. H., & Baker, F. B. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning in the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(4), 335-350. doi:10.1177/01466216930170040
• Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
• DeMars, C. E. (2002, April). Recovery of graded response and partial credit parameters in multilog and parscale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
• Emons, W. H. M. (2008). Nonparametric person-fit analysis of polytomous item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32(3), 224- 247. doi:10.1177/0146621607302479
• Erkuş, A., Sanlı, N., Bağlı, M., & Güven, K. (2000). Öğretmenliğe ilişkin tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 25(116). http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/5276/1439 adresinden erişildi.
• Fabiola, G., Iwin, L., Jennifer, L., & Zaira, V. (2012). The effect of the number of answer choices on the psychometric properties of stress measurement in an instrument applied to children. Evaluar, 12, 43-59. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/viewFile/4694/4488
• Galindo-Garre, F., Hendriks, S. A., Volicer, L., Smalbrugge, M., Hertogh, C. M., & van der Steen, J. T. (2014). The Bedford Alzheimer nursing-severity scale to assess dementia severity in advanced dementia: a nonparametric item response analysis and a study of its psychometric characteristics. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 29(1), 84-90. doi: 10.1177/1533317513506777
• Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement, 12, 38-47.
• Hemker, B. T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I. W., & Junker, B. W. (1996). Polytomous irt models and monotone likelihood ratio of the total score. Psychometrika, 61(4), 679-693.
• İlhan, M., & Güler, N. (2017). The number of response categories and the reverse directional item problem in likert-type scales: a study with the rasch model. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 8(3), 321-343.
• Jiang, S., Wang, C., & Weiss, D. J. (2016). Sample size requirements for estimation of item parameters in the multidimensional graded response model. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00109
• Junker, B., and Sijtsma, K. (2001). Nonparametric item response theory in action: an overview of the special issue. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 211- 220. doi:10.1177/01466210122032028
• Koğar H., (2015). Madde tepki kuramına ait parametrelerin ve model uyumlarının karşılaştırılması: bir monte carlo çalışması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 6, 142-157.
• Lee, J., & Paek, I. (2014). In search of the optimal number of response categories in a rating scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(7), 663-673. Leung, S. O. (2011). A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 412-421.
• Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4(2), 73-79.
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., Kramp, U., García-Forero, C., Gallardo-Pujol, D., & Coffman, D. (2009). The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: experimental evidence from intra-individual effects. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 295-308.
• Meijer, R. R. (2004, March). Investigating the quality of items in cat using nonparametric irt. Law School Admission Council Computerized Testing Report. A Publication of the Law School Admission Council.
• Meijer, R. R., & Baneke, J. J. (2004). Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 354-368. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.354
• Mokken, R. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis: with applications in political research. The Hague: Mouton.
• Mokken, R. J. (1997). Nonparametric models for dichotomous responses. In W. J. van der Linden, and R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 351-368). New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Molenaar, I. W. (2001). Thirty years of nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 295-299. doi:10.1177/01466210122032091 Ostini, R., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
• Pozehl, J. B. (1990). Application of item response theory to criterion-referenced measurement: an investigation of the effects of model choice, sample size, and test length on reliability and estimation accuracy (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9030146)
• Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1-15.
• Ramsay, J. O. (1991). Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika, 56(4), 611-630.
• Rivas, T., Bersabé, R., & Berrocal, C. (2005). Application of double monotonicity model to polytomous items: scalability of the beck depression items on subjects with eating disorders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1-10. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.21.1.1
• Sachs, J., Law, Y. K., & Chan, C. K. K. (2003). A nonparametric item analysis of a selected item subset of the learning process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 395–423. doi: 10.1348/000709903322275902
• Sijtsma, K. & Molenaar, W. I. (2002). Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory, USA: Sage Publications.
• Sijtsma, K., Debets, P., & Molenaar, W. I. (1990). Mokken scale analysis for polychotomous items: theory, a computer program and an empirical application. Quality and Quantity, Kluwer academic publishers, Netherlands.
• Štochl, J. (2007). Nonparametric extension of item response theory models and its usefulness for assessment of dimensionality of motor tests. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, 42(1), 75-94.
• Syu, J. J. (2013). Applying person fit-in faking detection-the simulation and practice of non parametric item response theory. (Doctoral Dissertation, National Chengchi University). Retrieved from http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/58646/1/251501.pdf
• Şengül Avşar, A., & Tavşancıl, E. (2017). Examination of polytomous items' psychometric properties according to nonparametric item response theory models in different test conditions. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(2). doi:10.12738/estp.2017.2.0246
• Tendeiro, J. N., & Meijer, R. R. (2013). The probability of exceedance as a nonparametric person fit statistic for tests of moderate length. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(8), 653–665. doi: 10.1177/0146621613499066
• Uyumaz, G., & Çokluk, Ö. (2016). An investigation of item order and rating differences in likert-type scales in terms of psychometric properties and attitudes of respondents. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 9(3), 400-425. doi:10.5578/keg.10011
• van der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in r. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11), 1-19.
• van der Ark, L. A. (2015). Package ‘mokken’. Retrieved from http://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/mokken/mokken.pdf
• van der Ark, L. A., van der Palm, D. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2011). A latent class approach to estimating test-score reliability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(5), 380-392. doi:10.1177/0146621610392911
• van Onna, M. J. H. (2004). Estimates of the sampling distribution of scalability coefficient h. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28(6), 427-449. doi:10.1177/0146621604268735
• Wang, W. C. (2004). Direct estimation of correlation as a measure of association strength using multidimensional item response models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(6), 937-955. doi:10.1177/0013164404268671
• Weng, L. J. (2004). Impact of the number of response categories and anchor labels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(6), 956-972.
• Young, M. A., Blodgett, C., & Reardon, A. (2003). Measuring seasonality: psychometric properties of the seasonal pattern assessment questionnaire and the inventory for seasonal variation. Psychiatry Research, 117(1), 75-83. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1781(02)00299-8
• Zhang, O. (2010). Polytomous irt or testlet model: an evaluation of scoring models in small testlet size situations (Master’s Thesis, Universtiy of Florida). Retrived from http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0042638/00001
• Zenisky, A. L., Hambleton, R. K., & Sireci, S. G. (2002). Identification and evaluation of local item dependencies in the medical college admissions test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39(4), 291 -309. doi:10.1111/j.1745- 3984.2002.tb01144.x