___

• Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: Kültür Yayıncılık.
• Andreou, E., Vlachos, F. & Andreou, G. (2006). Approaches to studying among Greek university students: The impact of gender, age, academic discipline and handedness. Educational Research, 48 (3), 301-311.
• Beşoluk, Ş. & Önder, İ. (2010). Investigation of teacher candidates' learning approaches, learning styles and critical thinking dispositions. İlköğretim Online, 9 (2), 679-693.
• Betoret, F. D. & Artiga, A. G. (2011). The relationship among basic student need satisfaction, approaches to learning, reporting of avoidance strategies and achievement. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 463-496.
• Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of metalearning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185-212.
• Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
• Biggs, J. B. (Eds.) (1991). Teaching for learning: The view from cognitive psychology. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
• Biggs, J. B. (1993). What do inventories of students` learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19.
• Biggs, J. B. (1996). Assessing learning quality: Reconciling institutional, staff and educational demands. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 5-15.
• Biggs, J. B., Kember, D. & Leung, D. Y. P., (2001). The revised two factor study process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71 (1), 133-149.
• Booth, P., Luckett, P. & Maldenovic, R. (1999). The quality of learning in accounting education: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 8 (4), 277-300.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Veri analizi el kitabı (11. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Byrne, M., Flood, B. & Willis, P. (1999). Approaches to learning: Irish students of accounting. Irish Accounting Review, 6 (2), 1-29.
• Byrne, M., Flood, B. & Willis, P. (2009). An inter-institutional exploration of the learning approaches of students studying accounting. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20 (2), 155-167.
• Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203-221.
• Chang, Z., Martin, V. & Tammy, S. (2008). A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Flemish university students: Do they differ in learning conceptions and approaches to learning? Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 120-127.
• Cope, C. & Staehr, L. (2005). Improving students' learning approaches through intervention in an information systems learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (2), 181-197.
• Cuthbert, P. F. (2005). The student learning process: Learning styles or learning approaches? Teaching in Higher Education, 10 (2), 235-249.
• Çolak, E. & Fer, S. (2007). Öğrenme yaklaşımları envanterinin dilsel eşdeğerlik, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16 (1), 197- 212.
• Diseth, A. (2001). Validation of a Norwegian version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST): An application of structural equation modeling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45 (4), 381-394.
• Duarte, A. M. (2007). Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in Portuguese students. Higher Education, 54, 781-794.
• Duff, A. (1997). A note on the reliability and validity of a 30-item version of the Entwistle and Tait’s revised approaches to studying inventory. British Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 529-537.
• Duff, A. (1999). Access policy and approaches to learning. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 8 (2), 99-110.
• Ekinci, N. & Ekinci, E. (2007). Hacettepe Üniversitesi İlköğretim Bölümü öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları. I. Ulusal İlköğretim Kongresi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi. 15-17 Kasım 2007. Ankara.
• Ekinci, N. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34 (151), 74-88.
• Elias, R. (2005). Students’ approaches to study in introductory accounting courses. Journal of Education for Business, 80 (4), 194-199.
• Ellez, A. M. & Sezgin, G. (2002). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme yaklaşımları. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi. ODTÜ Kültür ve Kongre Merkezi. 16-18 Eylül 2002. Ankara.
• Entwistle, N. J. & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
• Entwistle, N., Tait, H. & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15 (1), 33-48.
• Gadelrab, H. F. (2011). Factorial structure and predictive validity of approaches and study skills inventory for students (assist) in Egypt: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9 (3), 1197-1218.
• Gijbels, D. & Dochy, F. (2006). Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: Can formative assessment make a difference? Educational Studies, 32 (4), 399-409.
• Gijbels, D., Segers, M. & Struyf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36 (5-6), 431-443.
• Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F. & Van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20 (4), 327-341.
• Harper, G. & Kember, D. (1986). Approaches to study of distance education students, British Journal of Educational Technology, 17, 212-222.
• Heikkilla, A. & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: Students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (1), 99–117.
• Hounsell, D. (1984). Learning and essay-writing. The experience of learning. (Edt: F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press. pp. 103-123.
• Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (20. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Kayri, M. (2009). Araştırmalarda gruplar arası farkın belirlenmesine yönelik çoklu karşılaştırma (Post-Hoc) teknikleri. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19 (1), 51- 64.
• Kember, D., Biggs, J. & Leung, D. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the learning process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261-279.
• Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P. & McNaught, C. (2008). A workshop activity to demonstrate that approaches to learning are influenced by the teaching and learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 43-56.
• Kızılgüneş, B., Tekkaya, C. & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students' epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102 (4), 243-256.
• Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
• Leung, D. Y. P., Ginns, P. & Kember, D. (2008). Examining the cultural specificity of approaches to learning in universities in Hong Kong and Sydney. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 39, 251-266.
• Lietz, P. & Matthews, M. (2010). The effects of college students’ personal values on changes in learning approaches. Research in Higher Education, 51 (1), 65-87.
• Lucas, U. (2001). Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: A phenomonographic study. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 10 (2), 1-24.
• Magno, C. (2009). Investigating the effect of school ability on self-efficacy, learning approaches, and metacognition. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18 (2), 233-244.
• Marton, F. (1975). On non-verbatim learning: 1. Level of processing and level of outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16, 273-279.
• Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I - Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
• Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999). Relational perspectives on higher education teaching and learning in the sciences. Studies in Science Education, 33, 31-60.
• Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8, 411-427.
• Ramsden, P. (2000). Learning to teaching in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
• Reid, W., Duvall, E. & Evans, P. (2005). Can we influence medical students approaches to learning? Medical Teacher, 27 (5), 401-407.
• Richardson, J. T. E. (1995). Mature students in higher education: II. An investigation of approaches to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 20 (1), 5-17.
• Rodriguez, F. & Cano, F. (2007). The learning approaches and epistemological beliefs of university students: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 32 (5), 647-667.
• Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). ‘Learning style’: Frameworks and instruments. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 17 (1-2), 51- 63.
• Senemoğlu, N. (2011). College of education students’ approaches to learning and study skills. Education and Science, 36 (160), 65-80.
• Sezgin-Selçuk, G., Çalışkan, S. & Erol, M. (2007). Fizik öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme yaklaşımlarının değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27 (2), 25-41.
• Sharma, D. (1997). Accounting students' learning conceptions, approaches to learning, and the influence of the learning-teaching context on approaches to learning. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 6 (2), 125-146.
• Ramsden, P. (1987). Improving teaching and learning in higher education: The case for a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 12, 275-286.
• Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J. & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A re-conceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. Improving students as learners. (Edt: C. Rust). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University. pp. 262-271.
• Topkaya, N., Yaka, B. & Öğretmen, T. (2011). Öğrenme ve ders çalışma yaklaşımları envanterinin uyarlanması ve ilgili yapılarla ilişkisinin belirlenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36 (159), 192-204.
• Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning: A relational perspective. Higher Education, 37, 57-70.
• Watkins, D. (1982). Identifying the study process dimensions of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Education, 26, 76-85.
• Watkins, D. (1983). Assessing tertiary study processes. Human Learning, 2, 29-37.
• Watkins, D. & Hattie, J. (1981). The learning processes of Australian university students: Investigations of contextual and personological factors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 384-393.
• Yılmaz, M. B. & Orhan, F. (2010). Pre-service English teachers in blended learning environment in respect to their learning approaches. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9 (1), 157-164.