Farklı kalınlıktaki yeni nesil yüksek translusent monolitik zirkonyanın renk özelliklerinin UV yaşlandırma işlemi ile birliktedeğerlendirilmesi

Amaç:Çalışmanınamacıfarklıkalınlıklardaki yeni nesil yüksek translusent özellikteki monolitik zirkonya (MZ) renginin UV yaşlandırma öncesi ve sonrası in-vitro olarakdeğerlendirmektir.Yöntem: 5Y-TZP yapısındaki MZ bloklardan (IPS E.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar, Almanya) farklı 4 kalınlıkta (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm ve 2 mm) toplam 40 adet örnekler hazırlandı (n=10). Örneklerin renk değerleri (L*, a*, b*) UV yaşlandırma öncesi ve sonrası kolorimetre (ShadeEye NCC, Shofu, Japan) ile belirlendi. Elde edilen veriler tek yönlüvaryans analizi (ANOVA), Tukey HSD post-hoc testi ve Paired Sample T-Test ile istatistiksel olarakkarşılaştırıldı(p

___

1.Vagkopoulou T, Koutayas SO, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry. Part I. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009; 4: 130-151.

2.Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24(3): 299- 307.

3.Luo XP, Zhang L. Effect of veneering techniques on color and translucency of Y-TZP. J Prosthodont 2010; 19: 465-470.

4.Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA et al. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater 2015: 31; 1180-1187.

5.Kim HK, Kim SH. Optical properties of pre-colored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Dent 2016; 55: 75-81.

6.Bomicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stober T. Short-term prospective clinical evaluation of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia single crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29: 22-30

7.Mahmood DJ, Linderoth EH, Wennerberg A, SteyernP. Influence of core design, production technique, and material selection on fracture behavior of yttria- stabilized tetragonal zheses produced using different multilayer techniques: split-file, over-pressing, and manually built-up veneers. Clin Cosmet InvestigDent 2016; 12: 15-27.

8.Krell A, Hutzler T, Klimke J. Transmission physics and consequences for materials selection, manufacturing, and applications. J EurCeram Soc 2009; 29(2): 207-21.

9.Ulu H, Bayındır F. Monolitik zirkonyum restorasyonlar. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2016; 15:67-72

10.Tabatabaian F. Color aspect of monolithic zirconia restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthodont2019; 28(3): 276-287.

11.Camposilvan E, Leone R, Gremillard et al. Aging resistance, mechanical properties and translucency of different yttria-stabilized zirconiaceramics for monolithic dental crown applications. Dent Mater 2018; 34: 879–890.

12.Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, HaSR. Effect of the amount of thickness reductionon colorand translucency of dental monolithiczirconia ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8(1): 37-42.

13.Heffernan, MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88(1): 10-15

14.O’Keefe KL, Pease PL, Herrin HK. Variables affecting thespectral transmittance of light through porcelain veneer samples. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66(4): 434-438.

15.Kılınç H, Turgut S. Optical behaviors of esthetic CAD-CAM restorations after different surface finishing and polishing procedures and UV aging: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(1):107- 113.

16.Sharma G, Wu W, Dalal EN. The CIEDE2000 color difference formula: implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl 2005; 30:21-30.

17.Ghinea R, Perez MM, Herrera LJ, et al. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent 2010; 38: e57–64.

18.Rosenstiel, SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics (4th ed.) St. Louis: Mosby. 2006, 776

19.Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, et al. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015; 73: 602-8.

20.Şen N. Monolitik zirkonyanın kalınlığının ışık geçirgenliğine etkisinin incelenmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2018; 24(3): 163-168

21.Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JB, Yeo S, Ha SR. Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8: 37-42.

22.Turgut S, Kılınç H, Bağış B. Effect of UV aging ontranslucency of currently used esthetic CAD-CAMmaterials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31(2): 147- 152.

23.Kilinc E, Antonson SA, Hardigan PC, KeserciogluA.Resin cement colour stability and its influence on the final shade of all-ceramics. J Dent 2011; 39: 30-e36

24.Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J. Esthet Restor Dent 2015; 27: 1–9.

25.Bayindir F, Koseoglu M. The effect of restoration thickness and resin cement shade on the color and translucency of a high-translucent monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 23: 22-34.

26.Turgut S. Optical properties of currently used zirconia-based esthetic restorations fabricated with different techniques. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 9. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12533.

27.Oh SH, Kim SG. Effect of abutment shade, ceramic thickness, and coping type on the final shade of zirconia all-ceramic restorations: in vitro study of color masking ability. J Adv Prosthodont 2015; 7(2): 368-374.