TÜRKİYE EKONOMİSİ İÇİN FELDSTEIN-HORIOKA HİPOTEZİNİN GEÇERLİLİĞİ: EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME VE MARKOV REJİM DEĞİŞİM YAKLAŞIMI
Bu çalışma, Feldstein-Horioka hipotezini Türkiye Ekonomisi için çeşitli zaman serisi yöntemlerini kullanarak incelemektedir. Feldstein-Horioka (1980), yurtiçi tasarruflar ile yurtiçi yatırımlar arasında bir denklem tasarlamış ve bu denklemde yer alan parametrenin aldığı değere göre tasarrufların yurtiçinde mi yoksa küresel piyasalarda mı yatırıma dönüştüğünü tahmin etmiştir. Bu çalışmada ise, söz konusu hipotez Türkiye Ekonomisinin 1962-2015 dönemi için ele alınmıştır. Sermaye hareketliliğinde meydana gelen dönemsel değişim ve kırılmaları da gözleyebilmek amacıyla, analiz farklı alt dönemler ve tahmin yöntemlerini içermektedir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, 1990 yılına kadar yurtiçi tasarruflar ile yurtiçi yatırımlar arasında oldukça güçlü bir ilişki gözlenirken, 1990 yılından sonra bu ilişkinin zayıfladığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bunun yanı sıra, 1990-2015 dönemi ayrıca Markov Rejim Değişim Modeli ile de test edilmiş ve 2001 sonrası dönemde Türkiye’de küresel sermaye hareketliliğinin daha önceki dönemlere kıyasla oldukça arttığı ve bu açıdan bir kırılma yaşandığı gözlenmiştir. Tüm bu sonuçlar, Feldstein-Horioka Hipotezi bağlamında, Türkiye Ekonomisinin aradan geçen yıllar itibariyle dışa açılma eğiliminin arttığı şeklinde yorumlanabilir
The Validity Of Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis For Turkish Economy: Cointegration And Markov Regime Switching Approach
This study examines the Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis for Turkish Economy by using several time series techniques. Feldstein and Horioka (1980) have built and estimated a basic equation that shows the relationship between domestic savings and domestic investments to investigate whether domestic savings are retained for domestic investment or flows to international capital mobility. In the present study, this hypothesis has been tested for the period 1962-2015 of Turkish Economy. To be able to observe the periodical changes and breakpoints, the analysis contains different sub periods and estimation methods. Our findings show that while a very strong relationship has been observed between domestic savings and domestic investments for the period 1962-1990; after 1990, a lower coefficient has been estimated. Moreover, the period 1990-2015 has been also estimated via the Markov Regime Switching Model. The evidences obtained from this model show that pre and post 2001 periods give different results. It is observed that the international capital mobility of Turkish Economy has risen in the post 2001 period as against the previous years. Within the context of the Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis, all the obtained evidences reveal that the tendency for international capital mobility of Turkish Economy increases in time
___
- Alvarez-Plata, P., and Schrooten, M. (2006), The
Argentinean Currency Crisis: A Markov Switching
Model Estimation, The Developing Economies, XLIV1,
79-91.
- Arısoy, İ., (2013), “Türkiye’de Yatırım, Tasarruf ve
Sermaye Akışkanlığının Analizi”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari
Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt:14, Sayı:1, ss.69-80.
- Baek, J ve Kim, H.S., (2013) Is economic growth good
or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from
Korea, Energy Economics, Volume 36, March 2013,
Pages 744-749
- Bolatoğlu, N. (2005), “Türkiye’de Yurtiçi Yatırım ve
Yurtiçi Tasarruf Oranları Arasındaki İlişki”, Ekonomik
Yaklaşım, Cilt:16, Sayı:56, ss.19-32.
- Chakrabarti, A., (2006), “The saving–investment
relationship revisited: New evidence from multivariate
heterogeneous panel cointegration analyses”, Journal
of Comparative Economics, 34, pp.402–419.
- Chen, Shyh-Wei ve Chung-Hua, Shen, (2015),
“Revisiting the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle with regime
switching: New evidence from European countries”,
Economic Modelling, 49, pp.260–269.
- Coakley, J., A. Fuertes ve F. Spagnolo, (2004), “Is
Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle History?”, The Manchester
School, Vol. 72, No. 5, 1463–6786, pp.569–590
- De Vita, G. ve A. Abbott, (2002), “Are saving and
investment cointegrated? An ARDL bounds testing
approach”, Economics Letters, 77, pp.293–299.
- Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1979), Distribution
of The Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series
with a Unit Root, Journal of The American Statistical
Association, Volume 74, Issue 366, 427-431.
- Dursun, G. ve T. Abasız, (2014), “Feldstein-Horioka
Puzzle in Turkey”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 15, (1),
2014, ss.45-63.
- Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J., 1987. Co-integration and
error correction: representation, estimation, and
testing. Econometrica 55, 251–276.
- Esen, E., S. Yıldırım ve F. Kostakoğlu, (2012), “FeldsteinHorioka
Hipotezinin Türkiye Ekonomisi için Sınanması:
ARDL Modeli Uygulaması”, Eskişehir Osmangazi
Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,
7(1), ss.251-267.
- Feldstein, M. ve C. Horioka, (1980), “Domestic Saving
and International Capital Flows”, The Economic
Journal, Vol. 90, No. 358, pp.314-329.
- Feldstein, M., (1983), “Domestic Saving and
International Movements in the Long Run and the
Short Run”, European Economic Review, (21). NorthHolland.
Feldstein, M. ve P. Bacchetta, (1991), “National Saving
and International Investment”, NBER Working Paper
Series, Working Paper No: 3164.
- Fratzscher, M. (2002). On Currency Crises and
Contagion. European Central Bank Working Paper no.
139. Frankfurt: European Central Bank. Available from:
http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp139.pdf.
Friedman, Thomas, (2006), “Dünya Düzdür”, Boyner
Yayınları, İstanbul.
- Granger, C. W. J., and Newbold, P. (1974), Spurious
Regressions in Econometrics, Journal of Econometrics,
2, 111-120.
- Güriş, B., (2013), Türkiye’de Feldstein-Horioka
Hipotezinin Geçerliliğinin Sınanması: ADL Eşik Değerli
Koentegrasyon Testi”, Trakya Üniversitesi İktisadi ve
İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergi, Haziran, Cilt 2, Sayı 2,
ss.47-55.
- Hamilton, J. D. (1994), Time Series Analysis, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Harris, R., and Sollis, R. (2003), Applied Time Series
Modelling and Forecasting, Wiley, England.
- Johansen, S. (1988), Statistical Analysis of
Cointegration Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics
and Control, Volume 12, Issues 2-3, pp 231-254.
- Johansen, S., and Juselius, K. (1990), Maximum
Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration
– with Applications to The Demand of Money, Oxford
Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Volume 52, Issue
2, pp 169-210.
- Johansen, S. (1995), Likelihood-Based Inference in
Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford
University Press.
- Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P., and Shin, Y.
(1992), Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity
against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we
that economic time series have a unit root?, Journal
of Econometrics, vol. 54, issue 1-3, pp 159-178.
- Narayan, P., K., (2005), “The saving and investment
nexus for China: evidence from cointegration
tests”, Applied Economics, 37:17, 1979-1990, DOI:
10.1080/00036840500278103
- Obstfeld, M., (1986), “Capital Mobility in the World
Economy: Theory and Measurement”, Carnegie
Rochester Conference S
eries on Public Policy, 24,pp.55–104.
- Obstfeld, M., (1995), “International Capital Mobility
in the 1990s”, in P.B. Kenen (Ed.), Understanding
Interdependence: The Macroeconomics of the Open
Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Obstfeld, M. ve K. Rogoff, (2000), "The Six Major
Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a
Common Cause?", in Bernanke, Ben; Rogoff, Kenneth,
NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000 15, The MIT
Press, pp.339–390.
- Özmen, E., Parmaksiz, K., (2003), Policy regime change
and the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle: the UK evidence.
Journal of Policy Modelling, 25, pp.137–149.
- Panopoulou, E., Pittis, N., 2004. A composition of
autoregressive distributed lag and dynamic OLS
cointegration estimators in the case of serially
correlated cointegarion error. Econometrics 7, 585–
617.
- Pesaran, M.H., Smith, R.P., Akiyama, T., 1998. Energy
Demand in Asian Developing Economies, A World
Bank Study. Oxford University Press.
- Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y. (1999), An autoregressive
distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration
analysis. Chapter 11 in S. Strom (ed.), Econometrics
and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar
Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
- Peseran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001),
Bounds Testing Approaches to The Analysis of Level
Relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16:
289-326.
- Phillips, P. C. B., and Perron, P. (1988), Testing for a Unit
Root in Time Series Regression, Biometrika, Vol. 75,
No.2, pp. 335-346.
- Telatar, E., F. Telatar ve N. Bolatoglu, (2007), “A regime
switching approach to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle:
evidence from some European countries”, Journal of
Policy Modelling, 29, pp.523–533.
- Tesar, L. L., (1991), “Savings, Investment and
International Capital Flows”, Journal of International
Economics, 31, pp.55-78.
- Yavuz N., (2005), "Feldstein-Horioka Yaklaşımına Göre
Türkiye’De Tasarruf Yatırım İlişkisi Ve Hata Düzeltme
Analizi(1962-2003)", Maliye Araştırma Merkezi
Konferansları, cilt.47, ss.107-123.
- Yenturk, N, Ulengin, B ve Cimenoglu, A. (2009) An
analysis of the interaction among savings, investments
and growth in Turkey, Applied Economics, 41:6, 739-
751.