The Visceral Slide Test For The Prediction of Abdominal Wall Adhesions: A Prospective Cohort Study

An accurate prediction of abdominal wall adhesions would be extremely beneficial to help preventing injuries during the initial abdominal entry. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of the visceral slide test in predicting abdominal wall adhesions before surgery. One hundred fifty-five patients who underwent benign gynecologic surgery were prospectively enrolled. Seventy patients (45%) had previous baseline risk factors including abdominal surgeries, episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease [PID] or peritonitis. Eighty-five patients (55%) had no risk for intraabdominal adhesions. On the day of surgery, patients underwent the visceral slide test in five zones of the abdomen using ultrasonography, and a prediction of adhesions was made for each zone. Ultrasound findings were then compared with intraoperative visualization. A total of 112 laparotomies and 43 laparoscopies were performed. The use of the visceral slide test for the prediction of adhesions showed an overall accuracy of 86.5%, a sensitivity of 78.6%, a specificity of 88.2, a positive predictive value of 59.5%, and a negative predictive value of 94.9%. Our study suggests that the visceral slide test is an easy, non-invasive, and reliable method for predicting abdominal wall adhesions in women undergoing benign gynecologic surgery.

PDF

___

1.Randall D, Fenner J, Gillott R, et al. A Novel Diagnostic Aid for Detection of IntraAbdominal Adhesions to the Anterior Abdominal Wall Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016; 2016: 2523768.

2. Sigel B, Golub RM, Loiacono LA, et al. Technique of ultrasonic detection and mapping of abdominal wall adhesions. Surg Endosc 1991; 5: 161-165.

3. Brill AI, Nezhat F, Nezhat CH, Nezhat C. The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 269-272.

4. Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV. Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42: 246-254.

5.Champault G, Cazacu F, Taffinder N. Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996; 6: 367-370.

6. van der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EA, Gouma DJ. Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1253-1258.

7. Kolecki RV, Golub RM, Sigel B, et al. Accuracy of viscera slide detection of abdominal wall adhesions by ultrasound. Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 871-874.

8. Steitz HO, Meyer G, Schildberg FW. Ultrasonography of adhesions prior to laparoscopic procedures after previous abdominal operations. In: Farthmann EH, Meyer C, Richter HA (eds.). Current aspects of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Springer, New York 1997; 210-216.

9. Kothari SN, Fundell LJ, Lambert PJ, Mathiason MA. Use of transabdominal ultrasound to identify intraabdominal adhesions prior to laparoscopy: a prospective blinded study. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 843-847.

10. Tu FF, Lamvu GM, Hartmann KE, Steege JF. Preoperative ultrasound to predict infraumbilical adhesions: a study of diagnostic accuracy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 74- 79.

11. Nezhat CH, Dun EC, Katz A, Wieser FA. Office visceral slide test compared with two perioperative tests for predicting periumbilical adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1049- 1056.

12. Aubé C, Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, et al. Detection of peritoneal adhesions using ultrasound examination for the evaluation of an innovative intraperitoneal mesh. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 131-135.