We aimed to evaluate the possible effects of corneal edema on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with three different tonometers on the first day after cataract surgery. Sixty-four eyes of the 64 patients underwent phacoemulsification and IOP measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Tono-Pen applanation tonometer (TAT), and Pascal digital contour tonometer (DCT) the first day after surgery. Central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements were used to quantify the postoperative corneal edema. Intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot were used to assess the compatibility of IOP measurements among three method pairs. TAT and DCT IOP measurements were found to be compatible with each other (p=0.141) in the corneal edema group. The GAT and TAT IOP measurements in the eyes with corneal edema were inversely proportional to the CCT values (p=0.011 and p=0.033, respectively), but the DCT relationship was not statistically significant (p=0.44). The lack of a significant relationship between DCT and CCT in edematous corneas may suggest that DCT, as in normal corneas, can perform CCT-independent measurements. However, there is still no gold standard method for IOP measurement in edematous corneas.
___
Cook JA, Botello AP, Elders A, et al. Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1552-1557.
IOf S. Ophthalmic Instruments—Tonometers: ISO8612: 2001. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. 2001.
Galgauskas S, Strupaite R, Strelkauskaite E, Asoklis R. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with different contact tonometers in young healthy persons. Int J Ophthalmol 2016; 9: 76-80.
Gunvant P, O'Leary DJ, Baskaran M, Broadway DC, Watkins RJ, Vijaya L. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 337-343.
Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 2-6.
Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pursten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 471-476.
Hessemer V, Rössler R, Jacobi KW. Tono-Pen, a new tonometer. International Ophthalmology 1989; 13: 51-56.
Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non- contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 851-854.
Dohadwala AA, Munger R, Damji KF. Positive correlation between Tono-Pen intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1849-1854.
Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2002; 43: 1389-1392.
Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 344-350.
Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 146-155.
Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Kao L, Pham N, Tran AQ. The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and goldmann tonometry. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 451-456.
Herr A, Remky A, Hirsch T, Rennings C, Plange N. Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Ophthalmol 2013; 7: 815-859.
Stelzer R. Relationship of the corneal applanations to intraocular pressure in enucleated human eyes (author's transl). Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie Albrecht von Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 1973; 189: 33.
Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 38: 1-30.
Simon G, Small RH, Ren Q, Parel JM. Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Refract Corneal Surg 1993; 9: 110-117.
Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 359-366.
Hsu SY, Sheu MM, Hsu AH, et al. Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry. Eye (Lond) 2009; 23: 1582-1588.
Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005; 89: 1572-1575.
Oh JH, Yoo C, Kim YY, Kim HM, Song JS. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 247: 371-375.
Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry With Goldman Applanation Tonometry Over a Wide Range of Central Corneal Thickness. Journal of Glaucoma 2005; 14: 288-292.
Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 20-26.
Milla E, Duch S, Buchacra O, Masuet C. Poor agreement between Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in eyes with extreme pachymetry. Eye (Lond) 2009; 23: 536-542.
Frenkel REP, Hong YJ, Shin DH. Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. JAMA Ophthalmology 1988; 106: 750-753.
Horowitz GS, Byles J, Lee J, D'Este C. Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 32: 584-589.
Doering CJ, Feldman E, Bdolah-Abram T, Merideth RE, Ofri R. Mathematical Discrepancies of the Tono-Pen Applanation Tonometer. Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 30-36.
Kouchaki B, Hashemi H, Yekta A, khabazkhoob M. Comparison of current tonometry techniques in measurement of intraocular pressure. Journal of Current Ophthalmology 2017; 29: 92-97.
Sahin A, Basmak H, Yildirim N. The Influence of Central Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature on Intraocular Pressure Measured by Tono-Pen and Rebound Tonometer in Children. Journal of Glaucoma 2008; 17: 57-61.
Yildirim N, Sahin A, Basmak H, Bal C. Effect of central corneal thickness and radius of the corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured with the Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in healthy schoolchildren. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2007; 44: 216-222.
Browning AC, Bhan A, Rotchford AP, Shah S, Dua HS. The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2004; 88: 1395-1399.
Neuburger M, Maier P, Böhringer D, Reinhard T, F. Jordan J. The Impact of Corneal Edema on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: An In Vitro Model. Journal of Glaucoma. 2013;22(7):584-90.
Cone FE, Steinhart MR, Oglesby EN, Kalesnykas G, Pease ME, Quigley HA. The effects of anesthesia, mouse strain and age on intraocular pressure and an improved murine model of experimental glaucoma. Experimental Eye Research 2012; 99: 27-35.
Rochtchina E, Mitchell P, Wang JJ. Relationship between age and intraocular pressure: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 2002; 30: 173-175.
Tonnu P-A, Ho T, Newson T, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005; 89: 851-854.
Lin H-Y, Hsu W-M, Chou P, et al. Intraocular Pressure Measured With a Noncontact Tonometer in an Elderly Chinese Population: The Shihpai Eye Study. JAMA Ophthalmology 2005; 123: 381-386.
Nomura H, Ando F, Niino N, Shimokata H, Miyake Y. The relationship between age and intraocular pressure in a Japanese population: the influence of central corneal thickness. Current eye research 2002; 24: 81-85.