Kripto Paraların Dünya Genelindeki Hukuki Durumuna İlişkin Bir İnceleme

Ödemelerde kullanılan her şey para olarak kabul edilebilirken, kanuni bir statü kazanması için paranın resmi otoritece tanınması gerekir. Özgürlükçü çevrelerde olumlu karşılanan kripto paralara, ödeme sistemi içindeki oyuncular tarafından pek sıcak bakılmadığı görülmektedir. Küresel pazar hacmi bugün 1,79 trilyon doları geçmiş olan kripto varlıklar ve kripto borsalar dünya genelinde çoğunlukla yasal bir zemine sahip değillerdir. Merkez bankalarınca çıkarılması muhtemel bir resmi dijital paranın ise; bağımsızlık noktasında kripto paralardan ayrıldığı ve özellikle merkeziyet konusunda farklı yapıda olacağı söylenebilir. Kripto varlıkların vergilendirmesine dair, yaklaşık 15 ülkede farklı uygulamalarla birlikte küresel bir uzlaşının olmadığı gözlenmiştir

A Review of the Legal Status of Cryptocurrencies

Everything used in payments can be accepted as money, but they must be recognized by the official authority to gain a legal status. Cryptocurrencies, which are positively welcomed by libertarians, do not seem well with the actors of the financial system. Crypto assets and crypto exchanges with a global market volume of more than $ 1.79 trillion today mostly do not have a legal basis worldwide. An official digital currency likely to be issued by central banks; it is separated from cryptocurrencies at the point of independence and will have a different structure especially in terms of centralization. There appears to be no common consensus on taxation of crypto assets, with different practices in around 15 countries.

___

Akdağ, M. (2019). Kripto Paralizasyon ve Türkiye Ekonomisi için Bir Uygulama (Basılmış Doktora

Tezi), Atatürk Üniversitesi.

Alnıaçık, B. (2019). An Analysis of Current Status of Crypto Currencies Over the World and

Turkey, Research Studies Anatolia Journal, (2), 21–30.

Arıkan, N.İ. (2020). An Overview of the Cryptocurrencies: The Theory of Money Perspective, Malatya Turgut Ozal University Journal of Business and Administrative Sciences, 1(2), 147-165.

Arıkan. N.İ. (2021a). Digital Currencies: Some Theorical and Practical Implications. Ö. Kaya (Ed.), Research and Evaluations in Social, Administrative and Educational Sciences (323-363) içinde.

Ankara: ISPEC.

Arıkan, N.İ. (2021b). Identification of the Variables Effecting the Value of the Cryptocurrency, The

Journal of International Scientific Researches, 6(1), 27-34.

Baek, C., & Elbeck, M. (2015). “Bitcoins as an Investment or Speculative Vehicle? A First Look”.

Applied Economics Letters, 22(1), 30-34.

Banque de France. (2017). Bitcoin <https://www.banquefrance.fr/sites/default/files/medias/documents/declaration_francois_villeroy_de_galhau_ -

_bitcoin_-_01122017.pdf > (16.01. 2020).

BDDK, Bitcoin Hakkında Basın Açıklaması, (25.11.2013), 2013/32.

BIS (2018). Central Bank Digital Currencies. BIS Quarterly Rewiev, March.

Bech, M. L., & Garratt, R. (2017). “Central Bank Cryptocurrencies”. BIS Quarterly Review, September, 55-

70.

BOE. (2020). Central Bank Digital Currency: Opportunities, Challenges and Design. Bank Of

England.

Can, M., Khalilov, K., Gündebahar, M., & Kurtulmuşlar, İ. (2016). Bitcoin ile Dünya ve Türkiye’deki

Dijital Para Çalışmaları Üzerine Bir İnceleme. 19. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı-AB 2017

Aksaray Üniversitesi.

Christopher, N. (2018). “RBI Panel to Study Feasibility of Digital Currency”.

<https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/rbi-panel-to-studyfeasibility-of-digital-currency/articleshow/65601646.cms> (04.01.2020)

Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., Yarovaya, L. (2019). “Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A

systematic analysis”. International Review of Financial Analysis, 62, 182- 199.

CPMI (2018). Central Bank Digital Currencies. Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

Cuthberson, A., “İsviçre Devlet Başkanı: Facebook’un kripto parası çuvalladı “, Idependent, 31.12.2019.

Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016). Bitcoin, Gold and the Dollar – “A GARCH Volatility Analysis”. Finance Research

Letters, 16, 85-92

ECB. (2012). Virtual Currency Schemes. Frankfurt am Main: Europe Central Bank.

ECB. (2015). Virtual Currency Schemes – A Further Analysis. Frankfurt am Main: Europe Central Bank.

ECB. (2018). Securities Settlement Systems: Delivery-Versus-Payment in a Distributed Ledger Environment.

Europe Central Bank.

Garratt, R., & Wallace, N. (2018). “Bitcoin 1, Bitcoin 2,.: An Experiment in Privately Issued Outside

Monies”. Economic Inquiry, 56(3), 1887-1897.

Jackson, O. (2018). “US or Swiss Approach for EU Crypto Regulation?”. International

Financial Law Review, Feb 22.

Koning, J. (2016). Fedcoin: A Central Bank-Issued Cryptocurrency. R3 Reports.

<http://www.r3.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Fedcoin_Central_Bank_R3.pdf> (02.02.2020)

Kumhof, M., & Noone, C. (2018). “Central Bank Digital Currencies-Design Principles and Balance

Sheet Implications”. Bank of England Staff Working Paper, 725. (03.04.2020).

MAS. (2019). Project Ubin: Central Bank Digital Money Using Distributed Ledger Technology.

Monetary Authotarity of Singapore.

Öztürk,A. A., "Blokzincir (Blockchain) Teknolojisi ve Kripto Paraların Finans Sektörüne Etkisi ile

Ülkemizdeki ve Uluslararası Alandaki Önemli Yasal Düzenlemeler", Finans Hukuku Gündemi

Dergisi, 2019,(2).

Schweigl, J. (2018). “Central Bank Digital Currency–the Latest Challenge for the Theory of Monetary

Law”. In Optimization of Organization and Legal Solutions concerning Public Revenues and

Expenditures in Public Interest (Conference Proceedings), 385-390.

Resmî Gazete, On Birinci Kalkınma Planı, 23.07.2019.

Reuters. (2018). Switzerland Seeks Study of State-Backed E-Franc Cryptocurrency. (10.02.2020).

Şahin, E. (2018). "Crypto Money Bitcoin: Price Estimation with ARIMA and Artificial Neural

Networks”. Fiscaoeconomia , 2 (2) , 74-92.

Yılmaz, G. Ve Koç, T.S. (2019), “Kripto Para Alım Satımı ve Madenciliği Faaliyetlerinin

Vergilendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Tespit ve Öneri,” Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, Sayı 364, Ocak 2019,

ISSN 1300-8951, 23-42.