IMPACT OF ECONOMİC DEVELOPMENT ON DEMOCRACY: A CASE STUDY OF KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKİSTAN FROM 1991-2016

IMPACT OF ECONOMİC DEVELOPMENT ON DEMOCRACY: A CASE STUDY OF KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKİSTAN FROM 1991-2016

The relationship between economic development and democracy has dominated academic discourses fordecades. The theoretical and empirical evidence remain ambiguous about the direction of causality or themagnitude of the impact on each other. Exploiting a qualitative (case study) approach, this study examines theimpact of economic development on democracy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan for the period 1991-2016. Thestudy suggests that economic development in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan may not have had an impact on thecountry’s democratisation process. Although the study is limited by its case study design, it provides valuableinsights into the democracy-economic development nexus.

___

  • Bryman, A 2008, Social research methods, 3 rd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) 2016, The world factbook, Retrieved from: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/kz.html https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/uz.html
  • Chen, B & Feng, Y 1999, ‘Economic development and the transition to democracy: a formal model’, Social Choice and Welfare, 16(1): 1-16.
  • Ciasc, R 2013, ‘Do democracy and economic development compose a requisite association?’, Analele Universitatii ‘Eftimie Murgu’ Resita, pp. 301-303.
  • Diebolt, C, Mishra, T, Ouattara, B & Parhi, M 2013, ‘Democracy and economic growth in an interdependent world’, Review of International Economics, 21(4): 733-749.
  • Djezou, W 2014, ‘The democracy and economic growth nexus. Empirical evidence from Cote d’Ivoire’, European Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 251-266.
  • Doucouliagos, H & Ulubasoglu, M 2008, ‘Democracy and economic growth: a metaanalysis’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 61-83.
  • Edwards, J & Thames, F 2010, ‘Growth volatility and the interaction between economic and political development’, Empirical Economics, 39: 183-201.
  • Fida, B & Zakaria, M 2011, ‘Democracy and growth: a case study of Pakistan’, International Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 67-82.
  • Freedom House 2016, Freedom in the world: Kazakhstan, Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2016/kazakhstan
  • Freedom House 2016, Freedom in the world: Uzbekistan, Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2016/uzbekistan
  • Gersbach, H & Siemers, L 2014, ‘Can democracy induce development? A constitutional perspectives’, Public Choice, 159: 177-196.
  • Haan, J & Siermann, C 1995, ‘A sensitivity analysis of the impact of democracy on economic growth’, Empirical Economics, 20: 197-215.
  • Huber, E, Rueschemeyer, D & Stephens, J 1993, ‘The impact of economic development on democracy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 71-85.
  • Jaunky, V 2013, ‘Democracy and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: a panel data approach’, Empirical Economics, 45(2): 987-1008.
  • Krieckhaus, J 2006, ‘Democracy and economic growth: how regional context influences regime effects’, British Journal of Political Science, 36(2): 317-340.
  • Kubiszewska, K 2013, ‘A democracy and economic development in Western Balkan’, Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, pp. 454-462.
  • Libman, A 2012, ‘Democracy, size of bureaucracy, and economic growth: evidence from Russian regions’, Empirical Economics, 43: 1321-1352.
  • Lipset, S 1959, ‘Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 69-105.
  • Muller, E, Bollen, K & Jackman, R 1995, ‘Economic determinants of democracy’, Americal Sociological Review, 60(6): 966-982.
  • Nega, B 2011, ‘Short changing the value of democracy for economic development in Africa’, Forum for Social Economics, 40(3): 313-334.
  • Piatek, D, Szarzec, K & Pilc, M 2013, ‘Economic freedom, democracy and economic growth: a causal investigation in transition countries’, Post-Communist Economies, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 267-288.
  • Przeworski, A 2003, Democracy and economic development, New York University, Retrieved 9 July 2015 from:
  • Przeworski, A, Alvarez, M, Cheibub, J & Limongi, F 2000, Democracy and development: political institutions and wellbeing in the world, 1950-1990, 1 st Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • World Bank 2016, World development indicators, Retrieved from: http://data.worldbank.org/country/kazakhstan http://data.worldbank.org/country/uzbekistan
  • Wu, C 2012, ‘When is democracy better for economic performance and when it is not: the interaction between polity and structural factors’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 47: 365-388.
  • Zheng, Y 1994, ‘Development and democracy: are they compatible in China?’, Political Science Quarterly, 109(2): 235-259.
Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1999
  • Yayıncı: Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü