XRF, FT-IR Spektroskopik Yöntemleri ve SEM Yöntemi Kullanılarak Üç Dental Kompozit Örneklerin İncelenmesi

Günümüzde doğal dişin görünümünü taklit edebilen ve estetik olması nedeniyle dental kompozitlerin dental restorasyon malzemesi olarak kullanımı oldukça yaygındır. Bu çalışmada diş hekimlerinin çoğunlukla kullandığı üç farklı dental kompozit rezinin örneklerinin yapısal parametrelerinin tespiti spektroskopik analiz yöntemleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır. X-Işını Floresans Spektrometresi (XRF), Fourier Dönüşümlü Infrared Spektrofotometresi (FT-IR) ve Taramalı Elektron Mikroskobu (SEM) yöntemi ile yapılan element analizlerinde rezin örneklerinin yapısında bulunan bileşikler ve elementler tespit edilmiştir. Bileşikler 6-heptenoik asit, 2-metilbütirik asit, etilen oksit, propiyonik asit, 5-metil 3-heksanon, linoleik asit, 1-naftalenasetik asit, 4-hidroksi 4-metil 2-pentanon, trikloroasetonitril, benzil etil keton, 3-mercaptopropionik asit, oleik asit, 4-metil 2-pentanon, erüsik asit, deoksikolik asit’dir. Elemetler ise Si, Zr, Hf, Na, Al, Ca, S, Ti, Fe, K, Y, Ba, P, Cl, Sr, F, Zn’dir. Fiziksel olarak yapılan basma çekme testi sonucunda örneklerin maksimum gerilme, elastik uzama, maksimum kuvvet aralığı ve maksimum yüzde uzama miktarları: 10982.9-12867.1N/mm2; 0,00827-0.05214mm; 6987.00-13650.2N ve 77.4643-160.420 olarak tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Dental Kompozit, XRF, FT-IR, SEM

The Investigation of Three Dental Composite Samples by Using XRF, FT-IR Spectroscopic Methods and SEM Method

Dental composites are widely-used dental restoration materials that they are both aesthetical and they can easily simulate the natural appearance of teeth. In this study, determination of structural parameters of three different types of dental composite resin samples, which are widely used by dentists, was done by using spectroscopic analysis methods. Compounds and elements in the structure of resin samples were determined through X-Ray Fluorescent Spectrometer (XRF), Fourier Transformational Infrared Spectrometer (FT-IR) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) methods. the compounds are 6-heptenoicacid, 2-metilbutyricacid, ethyleneoxidepressure, propionicacid, 5-metil 3-hexanone, linoleicacid, 1-napthylaceticacid, 4-hydroxy 4-metil 2-pentanone, trichloroacetonitrile, benzyl ethyl ketone, 3-mercaptopropionicacid, oleicacid, 4-metil 2-pentanone, erucicacid, deoxycholicacid and, the elements are Si, Zr, Hf, Na, Al, Ca, S, Ti, Fe, K, Y, Ba, P, Cl, Sr, F, Zn. As a result of Compressive-Tensile Strength Test, stress, elastic strain, ultimate strength range and maximum percentage elongation levels were determined as 10982.9-12867.1N/mm2; 0,00827-0.05214mm; 6987.00-13650.2N and 77.4643-160.420.

Keywords:

Dental Composite XRF, FT-IR, SEM,

PDF

___

[1] Baum L, Phillips RW, Lund MR. 1985. Textbook Of Operative Dentistry. Tooth Colored Restratives. 2th. Edition, 206s.
[2] Bayırlı G, Şirin T. 1982. Konservatif Diş tedavisi. Dünya Tıp Kitapevi Ltd. Şti. ss161-184, İstanbul.
[3] Gladys S, Van MB, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. 1997. Comparative Physico-Mechanical Characterization Of New Hybrid Restorative Materials With Conventional Glass-İonomer And Resin Composite Restorative Materials. J Dent Res, Ss 883–894.
[4] Peutzfeldt A. 1997. Resin Composites İn Dentistry: The Monomer Systems. Eur J Oral Sci. ss97-116.
[5] Craig RG. 1989. Restorative Dental Materials 8th Ed. St. Louis.
[6] Parker S, Braden M. 1998. Water Absorption Of Methacrylate Soft Lining Materials. Biomaterials, ss5-91.
[7] Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. 1999. Polymerization Shrinkage And Elasticity Of Flowable Composites And Filled Adhesives. Dent Mater, Ss 37-128.
[8] Moszner N, Salz U. 2001. New Developments Of Polymeric Dental Composites. Prog.Polym.Sci, ss 535-576.
[9] Ikejima I, Nomoto R, Mccabe JF. 2003. Shear Punch Strength And Flexural Strength Of Model Composites With Varying Filler Volume Fraction, Particle Size And Silanation. Dent Mater, Ss 11-206.
[10] Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. 2007. Characterization Of Nanofilled Compared To Universal And Microfilled Composites. Dent Mater. Ss 9-51.
[11] Mitra SB, WU D, Holmes BN. 2003. An Application Of Nanotechnology İn Advanced Dental Materials. J Am Dent Assoc, ss90-1382.
[12] Pu Z, Mark JE, Jethmalani JM, Ford WT. 1997. Effects Of Dispersion And Aggregation Of Silica İn The Reinforcement Of Poly(Methylacrylate) Elastomers. Chem Mater, ss7-2442.
[13] Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. 2005. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials, ss4932–4937.
[14] Sturdevant M, Roberson TM, Heyman HO, Sturdevant JR. 2000.The Art And Science Of Operative dentistry, 3rd ed. StLouis, :Mosby.
[15] O’Brien WJ. 2002. Dental Materials And Their Selection. Polymeric Restorative Metarials. 3th Edition, Canada, ss113-116.
[16] Venhoven BAM, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. 1996. Influence of filler parameters on the mechanical coherence of dental restorative resin composites. Biomaterials, ss40-735.
[17] Rothmunda L, Hea X, Van KL, Helmut Schweikl L, Hellwig E, Carell T , Reinhar H, Reichl F-X, Högga C. 2005. Effect of Opalescence®bleaching gels on theelution of dental composite components. Biomaterials. 26, ss 1713–1719.
[18] Hervás García A, Martínez Lozano M A, Vila JC, Barjau Escribano A, Fos Galve P. 2006. Composite resins. A review of the materials and clinical indications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 11, E215-20.