TÜRK YÖNETİCİLERİNE GÖRE HENRİ FAYOL'UN YÖNETİM PRENSİPLERİNİN GÜNÜMÜZDEKİ GEÇERLİLİĞİ ÜZERİNE PİLOT BİR ÇALIŞMA

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Henri Fayol’ün yayınlanmasının üzerinden 100 yılı aşkın bir süre geçmiş olan 14 yönetim prensibinin günümüzde hala geçerli olup olmadığına dair Türkiye’deki yöneticilerin görüşlerini öğrenmektir. Büyük ölçüde betimsel ve daha büyük bir araştırmanın pilot aşaması olarak kurgulanan çalışmada 500 üzeri çalışanı olan Türk firmalarında görev yapan 35 yönetici ile anket yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, Fayol’ün görüşlerinin büyük ölçüde hala geçerli olarak değerlendirildiği görülmüştür. Araştırmaya katılan yöneticiler, özellikle Fayol’ün “inisiyatif kullanma”, “hakkaniyet/eşitlik”, “çalışanlar arasında birlik”, “personel ücretleri” ve “düzen” prensipleri ile kuvvetli bir biçimde hemfikirdir. En az destek bulan prensip ise “otorite” olmuştur.

A PILOT STUDY ON THE APPLICABILITY OF HENRI FAYOL'S MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES TODAY IN THE EYES OF TURKISH MANAGERS

The purpose of this study is to learn whether Turkish managers find 14 management principles of Henri Fayol still applicable today, having left over 100 years since publishment. It has been designed as the pilot stage of a wider study to follow and is of mostly descriptive nature. 35 survey interviews were carried out with managers of Turkish companies with over 500 employees. At the end, it is found out that Fayol principles are seen to be still valid. Agreement over “initiative”, “equity”, “esprit de corps”, “renumeration” and “order” principles have been highest; whereas “authority” was evaluated as least applicable.

PDF

___

Akbıyıklı, R., Gündüz, R., Opçin, G., Akdemir, M., Daraman, E. ve Tunç, G. (2017). Klasik yönetim teorileri örgütsel yapılarının çantiye bazında Türkiye’de bir incelemesi. Uluslararası Katılımlı 7. İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Samsun.
Albaum. G. (1997). The Likert scale revisited: An alternative version. Journal of the Market Research Society, 39(2), 331-348.
Araujo, D., Sampaio, F., Castro, M., Pinheiro, S. ve Macedo, A. (2014). Testing in time: from the classical management theory to the current organisation of nursing work. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 4(2), 111-119.
Amar, A., Hentrich, C. ve Hlupic, V. (2009). To be a better leader, give up authority. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 22-24.
Aman, Q., Saleem, M., Mehmood, N., Irfan, M., Imran, M. ve Hameed, I. (2012). Applicability of administrative school of thought in higher education institutions of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 367-379.
Bolton, P., & Dewatripont, M. (2012). Authority in organizations: A survey. Gibbons R. ve Roberts J. (Ed), The Handbook of Organizational Economics içinde (s. 342-372). Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Coşgel, M. ve Miceli, T. (1999). Job rotation: Cost, benefits, and stylized facts. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155(2), 302-320.
Crane, M. (2017). Managing for resilience: A practical guide for employee wellbeing and organizational performance. New York: Routledge.
Fayol, H. (2016). Administration industrielle et generale. Nouvelle edition augmente par Luc Marco, postface d’Emmanuel Okamba. Paris: Edi-Gestion & Andese.
Fields, D. (2002). Taking the measure of work: A guide to validated scales for organizational research and diagnosis. California: Sage Publications.
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K. ve Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two german samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 139-161.
Garland. R. The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable? Marketing Bulletin, 1991(2), 66-70.
Gill, P. ve Kaur, P. (2017). The thoughts of Henri Fayol and contemporary business world. International Journal of Emerging Issues in Management and Technology, 2(3), 1-23.
Godwin, A., Handsome, O., Ayomide, W., Enobong, A. ve Johnson, F. (2017). Application of the Henri Fayol principles of management in startup organizations. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 19(10), 78-85.
Lee, H. ve Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information System, 20(1), 179-228.
Mangkunegara, A. ve Octorend, T. (2015). Effect of work discipline, work motivation and job satisfaction on employee organizational commitment in the company (case study in PT Dada Indonesia). Universal Journal of Management, 3(8), 318-328.
Marume, S. ve Jubenkanda, R. (2016). The basic concepts and principles of unity of command and the span of control. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(6), 14-18.
Ouchi, W. ve Jaegert, M. (1978). Type Z organization: Stability in the midst of mobility. Academy of Management Review, 3(2), 305-314.
Poperwi, L. (2018). Principles of management: Their relevance and applicability in the management of current and future organisations. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management. 5(9), 808-812.
Rodrigues, C. (2001). Fayol's 14 principles of management then and now: A framework for managing today's organizations effectively. Management Decision, 39(10), 880- 889.
Sarwani, M. (2016). The effect of work discipline and work environment on the performance of employees. Sinergi, 6(2). 53-67.
Shafritz, M. ve Ott, S. (2001). Classics of organization theory (Fifth edition). Orlando, Florida: Harcourt College Publishers.
Suru, H., Mbalamula, S. ve Seni, J. (2017). Utility of Henri Fayol’s Fourteen Principles in the Administration Process of Secondary Schools in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(6), 103-116.