___

• Agarwal, A. ve Shankar, R. (2002). Analyzing alternatives for improvement in supply chain performance. Work Study, 51(1), 32- 37.
• Agustí, M. A., Ramos‐Hidalgo, E. ve Moreno‐Menéndez, A. M. (2021). The role of international knowledge acquisition and absorptive capacity as a predictor of international performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 39(1), 81-96.
• Alalwi, B., Mazzuchi, T., Hamdan, A. ve Mubarak, M. A. (2021). Blockchain technology implications on supply chain management: A review of the literature. A. Hamdan, A. E. Hassanien, R. Khamis, B. Alareeni, A. Razzaque ve B. Awwad (Ed.), Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Business, Education and Healthcare içinde (23-38. ss). Switzerland: Springer.
• Al-Haddad, M. A. ve Al-Abed, M. S. (2021). Stakeholders' engagement and performance efficiency at oil and gas industry in Yemen. Journal of Impact, 2(1), 1-15.
• Anning-Dorson, T. ve Nyamekye, M. B. (2020). Be flexible: Turning innovativeness into competitive advantage in hospitality firms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(2), 605-624.
• Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H. ve Machado, V. C. (2011). The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 850-871.
• Baba, M., Mahmood, R. ve Halipah, A. (2017). The moderating role of environmental turbulence on the relationship between organizational learning and firm innovativeness. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 7(2), 148-159.
• Balle, A. R., Oliveira, M. ve Curado, C. M. M. (2020). Knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity: Interdependency and complementarity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1943-1964.
• Caiazza, R., Phan, P., Lehmann, E. ve Etzkowitz, H. (2021). An absorptive capacity-based systems view of Covid-19 in the small business economy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(3), 1419-1439.
• Carvalho, C. E., Rossetto, C. R. ve Piekas, A. A. S. (2021). Innovativeness in Brazilian startups: The effect of the absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 29(1), 1-17.
• Cepeda‐Carrion, G., Cegarra‐Navarro, J. G. ve Jimenez‐Jimenez, D. (2012). The effect of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: Context and information systems capability as catalysts. British Journal of Management, 23(1), 110-129.
• Chen, I. J. ve Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119-150.
• Chen, M. C., Yang, T. ve Yen, C. T. (2007). Investigating the value of information sharing in multi-echelon supply chains. Quality & Quantity, 41(3), 497-511.
• de Zubielqui, G. C., Fryges, H. ve Jones, J. (2019). Social media, open innovation & HRM: Implications for performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 334-347.
• Doronin, D., Shen, L. ve Ali, M. (2020). Parallel mediating effect of knowledge sharing quality on team innovativeness. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(12), 1449-1461.
• Duan, Y., Huang, L., Luo, X., Cheng, T. C. E. ve Liu, H. (2021). The moderating effect of absorptive capacity on the technology search and innovation quality relationship in high-tech manufacturing firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 62, 101656.
• Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C., Allred, C. ve Magnan, G. (2009). Supply chain information‐sharing: Benchmarking a proven path. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(2), 222-246.
• Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A. ve Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98-116.
• Flatten, T. C., Greve, G. I. ve Brettel, M. (2011). Absorptive capacity and firm performance in SMEs: The mediating influence of strategic alliances. European Management Review, 8(3), 137-152.
• Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–51.
• Fubara, S. (2020). Social awareness and organizational innovativeness of manufacturing firms in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Business & Law Research, 8(1), 63-73.
• Goaill, M. M. ve Al-Hakimi, M. A. (2021). Does absorptive capacity moderate the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and supply chain resilience? Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1962487, 1-19.
• Ha, L. T. T., Kien, D. T., Dam, D. X. ve Huy, N. Q. (2020). Impact of innovativeness on business performance of Japanese firms in Vietnam. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 28(2), 159-179.
• Handfield, R. B. ve Bechtel, C. (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(4), 367-382.
• Hausman, W. H. (2004). Supply chain performance metrics. T. P. Harrison, H. L. Lee ve J. J. Neale (Ed.), The practice of supply chain management: Where theory and application converge içinde (61-73. ss.). Boston: Springer.
• Huo, B., Zhao, X. ve Zhou, H. (2014). The effects of competitive environment on supply chain information sharing and performance: An empirical study in China. Production and Operations Management, 23(4), 552-569.
• Kalyar, M. N., Shafique, I. ve Ahmad, B. (2019). Effect of innovativeness on supply chain integration and performance: Investigating the moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(2), 362-386.
• Kamaruddeen, A. M., Yusof, N. A. ve Said, I. (2010). Innovation and innovativeness: Difference and antecedent relationship. The Icfai University Journal of Architecture, 2(1), 66-78.
• Kurniawan, P., Hartati, W., Qodriah, S. ve Badawi, B. (2020). From knowledge sharing to quality performance: The role of absorptive capacity, ambidexterity and innovation capability in creative industry. Management Science Letters, 10(2), 433-442.
• Lee, J., Lee, H., ve Park, J. G. (2014). Exploring the impact of empowering leadership on knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and team performance in IT service. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 366-386.
• Li, X. ve Hu, J. (2012). Business impact analysis based on supply chain's knowledge sharing ability. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 12, 1302-1307.
• Li, Y., Ye, F. ve Sheu, C. (2014). Social capital, information sharing and performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(11), 1440-1462.
• Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K. ve Hua, Z. (2013). The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452-1462.
• Loon, L. K., Udin, Z. M., Hassan, M. G., Bakar, Z. A. ve Hanaysha, J. R. (2017). The power of organizational innovativeness in shaping supply chain operational performance. Advanced Science Letters, 23(9), 8579-8585.
• Lotfi, Z., Mukhtar, M., Sahran, S. ve Zadeh, A. T. (2013). Information sharing in supply chain management. Procedia Technology, 11, 298-304.
• Marshall, D. A. (2015). Assessing the value of supply chain information sharing in the new millennium. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 4(4), 10-21.
• Men, C., Fong, P. S., Luo, J., Zhong, J. ve Huo, W. (2019). When and how knowledge sharing benefits team creativity: The importance of cognitive team diversity. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(6), 807-824.
• Miroshnychenko, I., Strobl, A., Matzler, K. ve De Massis, A. (2021). Absorptive capacity, strategic flexibility, and business model innovation: Empirical evidence from Italian SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 130, 670-682.
• Mohammed, M. A. ve Jaber, M. M. (2017). Information sharing into electronic information sharing. Journal of Law and Society, 4(1), 1-18.
• Nguyen, N. P. (2020). The effects of cross-functional coordination and competition on knowledge sharing and organisational innovativeness: A qualitative study in a transition economy. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 10(1), 23-41.
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Özdağoğlu, A. (2016). Tedarik zincirinde kamçı etkisini oluşturan faktörlerin simülasyon programı ile analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(Özel Sayı), 161-178.
• Panayides, P. M. ve Lun, Y. V. (2009). The impact of trust on innovativeness and supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 35-46.
• Pelenk, S. E. (2017). Bireysel yenilikçi davranışların bireysel iş performansı üzerindeki etkisi: Teknoloji çalışanları üzerinde bir araştırma. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economics and Policy, 2(2), 2-14.
• Prajogo, D. ve Olhager, J. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 514-522.
• Rafique, M., Hameed, S. ve Agha, M. H. (2018). Impact of knowledge sharing, learning adaptability and organizational commitment on absorptive capacity in pharmaceutical firms based in Pakistan. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), 44-56.
• Saenz, M. J., Revilla, E. ve Knoppen, D. (2014). Absorptive capacity in buyer–supplier relationships: Empirical evidence of its mediating role. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(2), 18-40.
• Sanchez de Pablo Gonzalez del Campo, J. D. ve Škerlavaj, M. (2011). The organisational learning process as facilitator of innovativeness. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 9(4), 401-421.
• Sancho-Zamora, R., Hernández-Perlines, F., Peña-García, I. ve Gutiérrez-Broncano, S. (2022). The impact of absorptive capacity on innovation: The mediating role of organizational learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 842, 1-15.
• Sardar, S. ve Lee, Y. H. (2015). A quantitative model of supply chain innovativeness as a disruption management strategy in the textile industry. Advances in Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(1), 9-28.
• Seo, Y. J., Dinwoodie, J. ve Kwak, D. W. (2014). The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: Is supply chain integration a missing link? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 733–746.
• Sezen, B. (2008). Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(3), 233–240.
• Shen, B., Choi, T. M. ve Minner, S. (2019). A review on supply chain contracting with information considerations: Information updating and information asymmetry. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15-16), 4898-4936.
• Singhry, H. B. (2015). Supply chain innovation and performance of manufacturing companies. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(10), 42-60.
• Todorova, G. ve Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774-786.
• Vega‐Jurado, J., Gutiérrez‐Gracia, A. ve Fernández‐de‐Lucio, I. (2008). Analyzing the determinants of firm's absorptive capacity: Beyond R&D. R&D Management, 38(4), 392-405.
• Weissenberger‐Eibl, M. ve Schwenk, J. (2009). “Lifeblood knowledge”: Dynamic relational capabilities (DRC) and knowledge for firm innovativeness and competitive advantage. Measuring Business Excellence, 13(2), 7-16.
• Yan, R. ve Pei, Z. (2011). Information asymmetry, pricing strategy and firm's performance in the retailer-multi-channel manufacturer supply chain. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 377-384.
• Zahra, S. A. ve George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
• Zanandrea, G., Froehlich, C., Bitencourt, C. C. ve Camargo, M. E. (2021). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and innovation in the Brazilian Apple Production Chain. Revista Ciências Administrativas, 27(3), 9983.
• Zhao, S., Jiang, Y., Peng, X. ve Hong, J. (2021). Knowledge sharing direction and innovation performance in organizations: Do absorptive capacity and individual creativity matter? European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 371-394.