___

• Anderson, S. R. (1982). Where's morphology?. Linguistic Inquiry, 13(4): 571-612.
• Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-Morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Beard, R. (1982). Is separation natural?. Studia Gramatycne VII, 119:33.
• Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
• Blevins, J. P. (2006). Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 42(3), 531-573.
• Blevins, J. P. (2005). Word-based declension in Estonian. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2005 (pp.1-25). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam/Philedelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Dressler, W. U. (1985). Morphonology, the dynamics of derivation (Vol. 12). Ann Arbor: Karoma.
• Embick, D., & Noyer, R. (2007). Distributed Morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces (pp. 289-324). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
• Evans, R., & Gazdar, G. (1996). DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational linguistics, 22(2), 167-216.
• Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20: Linguistics Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111-76). MA: MIT Press.
• Harley H., & Noyer, R. ([1999] 2003). Distributed Morphology. In Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma (Eds.), The Second GLOT International State-of-the-article Book: The Latest in Linguistics [Studies in Generative Grammar [SGG] 61] (pp.463-96). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Hoeksema, J. (1985). Categorial Morphology. (Doctoral Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen) New York: Garland Publishing, 1985. 237 р.
• Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981, pp.3-91.
• Lieber, R. (1980). On the organization of the lexicon (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
• McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12(3), 373-418.
• Matushansky, O., & Marantz, A. P. (Eds.). (2013). Distributed Morphology Today. MIT Press.
• Montague, R. (1970). Universal grammar. Theoria, 36(3), 373-398.
• Sadock, J. M. (1985). Autolexical syntax: A proposal for the treatment of noun incorporation and similar phenomena. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 3(4), 379-439.
• Spencer, A. (2013). Lexical relatedness: A paradigm-based model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Spencer, A., & Zwicky, A. M. (Eds.). (1998). The handbook of morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Stewart, T. (2008). A consumer's guide to contemporary morphological theories. OSUWPL 58: 138-230.
• Stewart, T. (2015). Contemporary morphological theories: A user's guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Stewart, T., & Stump, G. (2007). Paradigm function morphology and the morphology- syntax interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces (pp.383-421). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
• Stump, G. T. (1991). A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language, 675-725.
• Stump, G. T. (1990). Breton inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In The Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages [Syntax and Semantics 23] (pp.97-119). San Diego: Academic Press.
• Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Wunderlich, D., & Fabri, R. (1995). Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 14(2), 236-294.