REVISITING SHAKESPEARE'S MEASURE FOR MEASURE: 1A PROBLEM PLAY IN TERMS OF THE ISSUE OF JUSTICE

William Shakespeare's Measure for Measure (1603) has been categorised as a problem play since the eighteenth century. However, scholars and critics have provided different views about what makes the play a problem play. The problem in genre, the darkness in tone and the unsatisfactory ending have been examined as the problematic features of the play. The aim of this article is to analyse Measure for Measure as a problem play in relation to the issue of justice. It will be demonstrated that Angelo, who takes over the management in the absence of the Duke, abuses justice through the strict enforcement of law eliminating the element of mercy while the Duke abuses justice as he monitors the corruption instead of fighting it, and exploits his subjects through tricks. Thus, Angelo's abuse of justice is related to the law whereas the Duke destroys his subjects' sense of justice. Accordingly, the questions which are raised in the minds of the audience/readers about the place of the spirit of the law in the enforcement of law, and the Duke's desire to stay in the background while being indirectly, though actively, involved in the action will also be examined as the features which make Measure for Measure a problem play.

SHAKESPEARE'İN “MEASURE FOR MEASURE” ADLI OYUNUNA YENİDEN BAKIŞ: ADALET KONUSU AÇISINDAN PROBLEM OYUNU

William Shakespeare'in Measure for Measure oyunu (1603), on sekizinci yüzyıldan bu yana problem oyunu olarak sınıandırılmaktadır. Ancak bilim insanları ve eleştirmenler, oyunu problem oyunu yapan özellikler konusunda farklı kirler sunmuşlardır. Oyundaki edebi tür problemi, oyunun üslubundaki belirsizlik ve okuyucuyu/izleyici tatmin etmeyen sonu, oyunu problem oyunu yapan özellikler olarak incelenmiştir. Bu makalenin amacı, Measure for Measure oyununu adalet konusunun ele alınışı açısından problem oyunu olarak incelemektir. Dük'ün yokluğu sırasında yönetimi devralan Angelo, merhamet ilkesini yok sayarak kanunları katı bir şekilde uygular ve adaleti kötüye kullanır. Dük ise ülkede artan yozlaşmayı engellemek yerine izler ve oynadığı oyunlarla vatandaşlarını kendi çıkarı için kullanır. Dolayısıyla, Angelo'nun adaleti kötüye kullanması kanunlarla ilgiliyken, Dük, vatandaşlarının adalet duygusunu yok eder. Buna bağlı olarak, kanunların uygulanmasında kanunun ruhunun yeri ve Dük'ün dolaylı ancak aktif bir şekilde olaya dâhil olurken geri planda kalmayı istemesi konularında seyircinin/okuyucunun kafasında oluşan sorular Measure For Measure oyununu problem oyunu yapan özellikler olarak incelenecektir.

PDF

___

Bennett, Josephine Waters. Measure for Measure as Royal Entertainment. New York:London: Columbia UP, 1966.

Bevington, David. This Wide and Universal Theater: Shakespeare in Performance Then and Now. Chicago, London: Chicago UP, 2007.

Boas, Frederick S. Shakspeare and his Predecessors. New York: Haskell House, 1986.

Dowden, Edward. Shakspere. London: Macmillan, 1879.

Egan, Gabriel. Shakespeare. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2007.

Foakes, Reginald A. Shakespeare the Dark Comedies to the Last Plays: From Satire to Celebration. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971.

Gless, Darryl J. Measure for Measure, the Law and the Convent. Princeton; New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1979.

Halliday, Frank Ernest. Shakespeare and his Critics. London: Gerald Duckworth, 1958.

Hawkins, Harriett. Measure for Measure. Boston: Twayne, 1987.

Knights, L.C. “The Ambiguity of Measure for Measure.” Shakespeare: Measure for Measure. Ed. C.K. Stead. London: Macmillan, 1971. 138-152.

Lawrence, Ross. On Measure for Measure: An Essay in Criticism of Shakespeare’s Drama. Newark: Delaware UP, 1997.

Lawrence, William Witherle. Shakespeare’s Problem Comedies. London: Penguin, 1969.

Lewis, Cynthia. “‘Dark Deeds Darkly Answered’: Duke Vincentio and Judgment in Measure for Measure.” Shakespeare Quarterly 34.3 (1983): 271-289. Web. 28 November 2014.

Margolies, David. Shakespeare’s Irrational Endings: The Problem Plays. London: Macmillan, 2012.

Marsh, Nicholas. Shakespeare: Three Problem Plays. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

Ridley, Maurice Roy. Shakespeare’s Plays. London: West, 1978.

Risden, E.L. Shakespeare and the Problem Play: Complex Forms, Crossed Genres and Moral Quandaries. London: McFarland&Company, 2012.

Rossiter, Arthur Percival. Angel with Horns: Fifteen Lectures on Shakespeare. London, New York: Longman, 1989.

Schanzer, Ernest. The Problem Plays of Shakespeare: A Study of Julius Caesar, Measure for Measure, Antony and Cleopatra. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965.

Schlegel, Augustus William. Course of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature. New York: AMS, 1973.

Scott, Michael. Renaissance Drama and a Modern Audience. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1982.

Shakespeare, William. Measure for Measure. Ed. J.W. Lever. The Arden Edition. London; New York: Methuen, 1965.

Thomas, Vivian. The Moral Universe of Shakespeare’s Problem Plays. London; Sydney: Croom Helm, 1987.

Tillyard, Eustace Mandeville Wetenhall. Shakespeare’s Problem Plays: Hamlet, Troilus and Cressida, All’s Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure. London: Penguin, 1993.

Ure, Peter. The Problem Plays. London: Longmans, 1961.

Wharton, T.F. Measure for Measure. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1989.

Wheeler, Richard P. Shakespeare’s Development and the Problem Comedies: Turn and Counter-Turn. California: California UP, 1981.