The Impact of Reciprocal Teaching on Pre-Service English-as-a-Foreign-Language Teachers’ Reading Comprehension Skills

This quasi-experimental study explored the impact of a seven-week intervention in reciprocal teaching (RT) on improving pre-service English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) teachers’ (PSEFLTs) reading comprehension skills. The experimental group (N = 56) were subjected to an intervention designed to help them understand and apply the steps in RT while the control group (N = 53) attended to reading classes taught conventionally. Data was collected from a pre-reading test administered prior to the commencement and a post-reading test administered following the intervention, and a semi-structured interview. The findings revealed there was no statistically significant difference in experimental and control participants’ reading comprehension skills in the pre-reading test; nevertheless, the experimental group outperformed the control group in the post-reading test. Analysis of the qualitative data demonstrated the PSEFLTs viewed the RT intervention as effective in developing their reading comprehension skills and would implement it in their future teaching.

___

  • Abdolrezapour, P., & Tavakoli, M. (2012). The relationship between emotional intelligence and EFL learners’ achievement in reading comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1-13.
  • Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40, 1063-1081.
  • Alamprese, J. A., MacArthur, C. A., Price, C., & Knight, D. (2011). Effects of a structured decoding curriculum on adult literacy learners’ reading development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 154–172.
  • Albashtawi, A. H. (2019). Improvement of EFL students’ academic reading achievement through the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA). Reading Psychology, 40, 679-704.
  • Ari, O. (2016). Word recognition processes in college-age students’ reading comprehension achievement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(8), 718-423.
  • Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811.
  • Bosley, L. (2008). “I don't teach reading”: Critical reading instruction in composition courses. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(4), 285-308.
  • Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1-17.
  • Caverly, D. C., Nicholson, S. A., & Radcliffe, R. (2004). The effectiveness of strategic reading instruction for college developmental readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 35(1), 25-49.
  • Chang, C. K., & Hsu, C. K. (2011). A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation–Annotation system for English as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 155-180.
  • Chang, A. C., & Millett, S. (2015). Improving reading rates and comprehension through audioassisted extensive reading for beginner learners. System, 52, 91-102.
  • Chang, M. M., & Lan, S. W. (2019). Exploring undergraduate EFL students’ perceptions and experiences of a Moodle-based reciprocal teaching application. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2019.1708298
  • Chen, C. M., & Chen, F. Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers & Education, 77, 67-81.
  • Cockerill, M., Thurston, A., & Taylor, A. (2019). Protocol: An efficacy randomized controlled trial of Reciprocal Reading in high schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 99-106.
  • Cox, S. R., Friesner, D. L., & Khayum, M. (2003). Do reading skills courses help underprepared readers achieve academic success in college? Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(2), 170-196.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Datta, S., & Ross, M. M. (2002). Reading skills and reading habits: A study of new Open University undergraduate reserves. Open Learning, 17(1), 69-88.
  • Ditzel, S. N. (2010). Metacognitive reading strategies can improve self-regulation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 45-63.
  • Douglas, K., Barnett, T., Poletti, A., Seaboyer, J., & Kennedy, R. (2016). Building reading resilience: re-thinking reading for the literary studies classroom. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 254-266.
  • Durmin, C. C., & Sherman, W. M. (2008). Does choice of college textbook make a difference in students' comprehension? College Teaching, 56(1), 28-34.
  • Feller, D. P., Magliano, J., Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., Kopatich, R. D. (2020). Does choice of college textbook make a difference in students' comprehension? Discourse Processes, 57(5-6), 473-490.
  • Ferrer, A., Abarca, E. V., Serrano, M. A., Gilabert, R. (2017). Impact of text availability and question format on reading comprehension processes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 404-415.
  • Fink, A. (2010). Survey research methods. In P. Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGraw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 152-160). Elsevier Ltd.
  • Ghaith, G. (2003). Effects of the learning together model of cooperative learning on English as a foreign language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 451-474. Ghavamnia, M. (2019). Improving Iranian graduate students’ performance in reading scientific articles in English through explicit strategy instruction. Reading Psychology, 40, 612-637.
  • Gilbert, F. (2018). Riding the reciprocal teaching bus. A teacher’s reflections on nurturing Collaborative learning in a school culture obsessed by results. Changing English, 25(2), 146-162.
  • Gorzycki, M., Howard, P., Allen, D., Desa, G., & Rosegard, E. (2016). An exploration of academic reading proficiency at the university level: A cross-sectional study of 848 undergraduates. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(2), 142-162.
  • Gruenham, E. A. (2012). Common literacy struggles with college students: Using the reciprocal teaching technique. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 42(2), 109-116.
  • Higher Education Board. (2018). https://bit.ly/3aDLGY6
  • Howard, P. J., Gorzycki, M., Desa, G., & Alan, D. D. (2018). Academic reading: Comparing students’ and faculty perceptions of its value, practice, and pedagogy. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 48, 189-209.
  • Hsu, H. Y., & Wang, S. (2010). The impact of using blogs on college students' reading comprehension and learning motivation. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(1), 68-88.
  • Huang, S., Capps, M., Blacklock, J., & Garza, M. (2014). Reading habits of college students in the United States. Reading Psychology, 35(5), 437-467.
  • Huang, H. (2016). Online Versus Paper-based Instruction: Comparing Two Strategy Training Modules for Improving Reading Comprehension. RELC Journal, 45(2), 165-180.
  • Jalilifar, A. (2010). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students’ reading comprehension. System, 38, 96-108.
  • Kealey, M. B., & Mather, N. (2019). Use of an online reading intervention to enhance the basic reading skills of community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(9), 631-647.
  • Khezrlou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted glosses on EFL learners' vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension in three learning conditions. System, 65, 104-116.
  • Kim, H. (2016). The relationship between Korean university students’ reading attitude, reading strategy use, and reading proficiency. Reading Psychology, 37, 1162-1195.
  • King, C. M., & Johnson, L. M. P. (1998). Constructing meaning via reciprocal teaching. Literacy Research and Instruction, 38(3), 169-186.
  • Kingston, A. J., & George, C. E. (2014). The effects of special reading training upon the development of college students’ reading skills. The Journal of Educational Research. doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1957.10882399.
  • Kuehner, A. V. (1999). The effects of computer instruction on college students' reading skills. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 29(2), 149-165.
  • Kung, F. W. (2019). Teaching second language reading comprehension: The effects of classroom materials and reading strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 93-104.
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
  • Liu, Y. (2020). Online English reading instruction in the ESL classroom based on constructivism. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(4), 539-552.
  • Macaruso, P., & Shankweiler, D. (2010). Expanding the simple view of reading in accounting for reading skills in community college students. Reading Psychology, 31, 454-471.
  • Moon, A. L., Wold, C. M., & Francom, G. M. (2016). Enhancing Reading Comprehension with Student-Centered iPad Applications. TechTrends, 61, 187-194.
  • Morshedian, M., Hemmati, F., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2017). Training EFL Learners in Self-Regulation of Reading: Implementing an SRL Model. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 290-303.
  • Nam, K. H., & Page, L. (2014). Investigating metacognitive awareness and reading strategy use of EFL Korean university students. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 195-220.
  • Nayak, G., & Sylva, K. (2013). The effects of a guided reading intervention on reading comprehension: A study on young Chinese learners of English in Hong Kong. The Language Learning Journal, 41(1), 85-103.
  • Nhapulo, M. A., Simon, E., & Herreweghe, M. V. (2017). Enhancing academic reading skills through extensive reading. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 35(1), 17-40.
  • Okkinga, M., Steensel, R. V., Gelderen, A. J. S. V., Schooten, E. V., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Arends, L. R. (2018). Effectiveness of reading-strategy interventions in whole classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1215-1239.
  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
  • Seymour, J. R., & Osana, H. P. (2003). Reciprocal Teaching procedures and principles: two teachers’ developing understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 325-344.
  • Shore, J., Sabatini, J., Lentini, J., Holtzman, S., & McNeil, A. (2015). Development of an evidence-based reading fluency program for adult literacy learners. Reading Psychology, 36, 86- 104.
  • Slater, W. H., & Horstman, F. R. (2002). Teaching reading and writing to struggling middle school and high school students: the case for reciprocal teaching. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 46(4), 163-166.
  • Song, K., Na, B., & Kwon, H. J. (2020). A comprehensive review of research on reading comprehension strategies of learners reading in English-as-an-additional language. Educational Research Review, 29, 1-12.
  • Soonthornmanee, R. (2002). The effect of the reciprocal teaching approach on the reading comprehension of EFL students. RELC Journal, 33(2), 125-141.
  • Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students’ reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19, 272-286.
  • Taraban, R., Kerr, M., & Rynearson, K. (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students’ metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25(2), 67-81.
  • Tarchi, C., & Pinto, G. (2016). Reciprocal teaching: Analyzing interactive dynamics in the co-construction of a text’s meaning. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 518-530.
  • Tsai, Y. R., Ernst, C., & Talley, P. C. (2010). L1 and L2 strategy use in reading comprehension of Chinese EFL readers. Reading Psychology, 31, 1-21.
  • Tseng, S. S., & Yeh, H. C. (2018). Integrating reciprocal teaching in an online environment with an annotation feature to enhance low-achieving students’ English reading comprehension. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(6), 789-802.
  • Wang, Y. H. (2017). Integrating self-paced mobile learning into language instruction: Impact on reading comprehension and learner satisfaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 397-411.
  • Wulfemeyer, J. (2019). Modeling metacognition and providing background knowledge via guided reading videos. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49, 75–88.
  • Yang, Y. F. (2010). Developing a reciprocal teaching/learning system for college remedial reading instruction. Computers & Education, 55, 1193-1201.
  • Yang, Y. F. (2012). Blended learning for college students with English reading difficulties. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 393–406.
  • Zendler, A., & Reile, S. (2018). The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed instruction on learning outcome in computer science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 132-144.
  • Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T. N. R. B. T. M. (2010). Collaborative strategic reading with university EFL learners. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(1), 67-94.