___

• Bennett, S., Maton, K., ve Kervin, L. (2008). The digital natives‘ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786.
• Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlan- guage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136.
• Cheng, H.J., Zhan, H ve Chen, X. (2010). Using virtual reality space in training Mandarin pre-service teachers: An innovative method. Chung Yuan Journal of Teaching Chinese as a Second Language, 5, 157-177.
• Clark, R. C. ve Kwinn, A. (2007). The new virtual classroom: Evidence-based guidelines for synchronous learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. ve Morrison, K., (2007). Research methods in education, New York: Routledge.
• Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (2008). New directions in CALL: An objective introduction to Second Life. CALICO Journal 25(3), 547-557.
• Council for Cultural Comission. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, Learning, Teaching, Assesment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five app- roaches, (2. Baskı.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Ellis, R. (2003). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
• Garcia-Carbonell, A., Rising, B., Montero, B. ve Watts, F. (2001). Simulation/gaming and the acquisition of communicative competence in another language. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 481-491.
• Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• Hall, G. (2011). Exploring English language teaching: Language in Action. London:Routledge.
• Hall, J. K. ve Verplaetse, L. S. (2000). Second and foreign language learning through clas- sroom interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Hislope, K. (2008). Learning in a Virtual World, The International Journal of Learning, 15, 51-58.
• Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
• Lantolf, J. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Lee, L. (2004). Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Görüntüleme adresi ve tarihi,10 Mayıs 2015, http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/defa- ult. html
• Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
• Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. C. William, T. Ritchie; T. K. Bhatia (Yay.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (ss. 413-454) içinde. San Diego: Academic Press.
• Lyster, R. ve Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation for form incommunicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 37–66.
• Milk, R.D. (1990). Can foreigners do “foreigner talk?: A study of the linguistic input provi- ded by non-native teachers of EFL, Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education,1(4), 274–88.
• Peterson, M. (2010). Learner Participation patterns and strategy use in Second Life: An exp- loratory case study, ReCALL: European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 273-292.
• Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language lear- ning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
• Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research: A practical handbook, London: Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
• Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-54.
• Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynch- ronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Görüntüleme adresi ve tarihi, 10 Mayıs 2015, http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological pro- cesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Wang, C.; Song, H.; Xia, F ve Yan, Q. (2009). Integrating Second Life into an EFL prog- ram: Students´ perspectives, Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 1-16.
• Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing potential for and the bar- riers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (3), 414–426.
• Warschauer, M. ve Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and prac- tice, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Yamada, M.ve Akahori, K. (2007). Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of lear- ning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 37-65.
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.