Ömer ATALAR, MUSTAFA KOÇ, ZAİT ENDER ÖZKAN, YEŞİM ASLAN KANMAZ, SAİME BETÜL BAYGELDİ, Asuman ARKAŞ ALKLAY

Oklu Kirpilerde Trachea’nın Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ile İncelenmesi

Oklu kirpiler üzerinde yapılan literatür taramalarında trachea’nın bilgisayarlı tomografi metodu ile incelendiği bir araştırmaya rastlanılmamıştır. Bu çalışmada; oklu kirpilerde trachea’nın bilgisayarlı tomografi ile ilk kez incelenmesi ve alanına önemli katkılar sağlaması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada 10 erişkin oklu kirpi kullanılmıştır. Multidedektör bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleri ve ölçümleri trachea ’nın pars cervicalis’i ve pars thoracalis’inden belirlenen 4 noktadan alınmıştır. Erkek ve dişiler arasında anlamlı bir istatistiksel ayrım tespit edilmemiştir. Bütün materyallerde vertical çap, transversal çaptan daha yüksek olarak ölçülmüştür. Ayrıca deneklerin tamamında; trachea’nın çaplarının cranial’den caudale gidildikçe artması dikkat çekici bulunmuştur. İstatistiksel incelemede; vertical (V) ve transversal (T) çaplar ile lümen kesit alanı (crossection area) (CSA) ölçümlerinde, cervical ve thoracal değerler arasındaki farklar anlamlı bulunmuştur. Bu çalışmanın benzer araştırmalara referans veriler sunacağına kanaat getirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Oklu kirpi, Bilgisayarlı tomografi, Trachea

The Investigation of the Trachea in Porcupines with Computerized Tomography

In literature reviews on porcupines, no research has been found on the examination of the trachea’s computerized tomography. In this study, it was aimed to examine the computerized tomography for the first time in porcupines and to provide significant contributions in this field. A total of 10 adult porcupines were used in the study. The multidetector computerized tomography views and the measurements were taken from the 4 specified points of the pars cervicalis and pars thoracalis of the trachea. A meaningful statistical distinction between the males and females was not found. In all the materials, the vertical diameter was measured higher than the transversal diameter. Also in all of the subjects; the increase in the diameters of the trachea from the cranial towards the caudal was found to be remarkable. In the statistical investigation; in the measurements of the vertical (V) and transversal (T) diameters and in the measurements of the lumen crosssectional area (CSA), the differences between the cervical and thoracal measurement values were found to be significant. It was thought that this study will provide reference datas for similar studies.

Keywords:

Porcupine, Computerized tomography, Trachea,

PDF

___

1. Atalar Ö, Koç M, İlgün R, Yılmaz B. (2017). Oklu Kirpilerde Böbreklerin Bilgisayarlı Tomografi İle İncelen-mesi. Harran Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 6: 138-141.
2. Dallman MJ, Brown EM. (1984). Statistical Analysis Of Selected Tracheal Measurements in Normal Dogs And Dogs With Collapsed Trachea. Am J Vet Res. 45: 1033-1037.
3. Burk RL, Ackerman N. (1996). Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasonograph. A Diagnostic Atlas and Text. Phila-delphia, Saunders. 98.
4. Carlisle CH, Bilry DN, Thrall DE. (1991). Tracheal and Laryngeal Tumors in The Dog and Cat, Literature Review and 13 Additional Patients. Vet Radiology. 32: 229-235.
5. Brovida C, Castagnaro M. (1992). Tracheal Obstruction Due to an Eosinophilic Granuloma in A Dog, Surgical Treatment and Clinicopathological Observations. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 28: 8-12.
6. Röcken H, Röcken M. (1994). Foreign Body in the Bifurcation Trachea in a Dog. Berl Münch Tierarztl Wschr. 107:121-123.
7. Kara ME, Karaman ZC, Dabanoglu I, Ocal MK. (2001). Computed Tomogaphic Measurements of the Trachea in Dog. Dtsch Tierarztl Wschr. 108: 164-167.
8. Atalar Ö, Koç M, Yüksel M, Arkaş Alklay A. (2017). Kangal Köpeklerinde Pelvis Boşluğunun Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ile Üç Boyutlu Değerlendirilmesi. Fırat Üniver-sitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi. 31: 105-109.
9. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. (2012). Prepared by the International Committes on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature and Authorized by the General Assambly of the World Association of Veterinary Anatomists, The Editorial Committee Hannover, Sapporo, Japan.
10. Van Pelt RW. (1998). Confirming Tracheal Hypoplasia in Huskymix Pups. Vet Med. 83: 266-273.
11. Salisbury SK, Forbes S, Blevins WE. (1990). Peritrac-heal Abscess Associated With Tracheal Collapse And Bilateral Laryngeal Paralysis in A Dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 196:1273-1275.
12. Smith MM, Gourley IM, Amis TC, Kurpershoek C. (1990). Management of Tracheal Stenosis in A Dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 196: 931-934.
13. Coyne BE, Fingland RB. (1992). Hypoplasia of The Trachea in Dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 201:768-772.
14. Watt PR. (1992). Congenital Tracheal Collapse in A Young Fox Terrier. Aust Vet Pract. 22: 112-116.
15. Nelson WA. (1993). Lower Respiratory System. ln: Slatter D (Editor) Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Philadelphia, Saunders. pp: 777-786.
16. White RAS, Williams JM. (1994). Tracheal Collapse in the Dog is There Really a Role For Surgery? J Small Anim Prac. 35: 191-196.
17. Fingland RB, Layton CI, Kennedy GA, Galland JC. (1995). A Comparison of Simple Continuous Versus Simple Interrupted Sutura Patterns for Tracheal Anastomo-sis After Large-Segment Trachea1 Resection in Dogs. Vet Surg. 24: 320-330.
18. Johnson LR, Krahvinkel DJ, Kiernan BC. (1993). Surgical Management of Atypical Lateral Tracheal Collapse in a Dog. J Am Vet Med Assoç. 203: 1693-1696.
19. Rudorf H, Herrtage ME, White RAS. (1997). Use of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Tracheal Collapse. J Small Anim Prac. 38: 513-518.
20. Dabanoglu I, Ocal MK, Kara ME. (2001). A Quantita-tive Study on the Trachea of the Dog. Anat Histol Embryol. 30: 57-59.
21. Huber ML, Henderson RA, Finn-Bodner S, Macintire DK, Wright JC, Hankes GH. (1997). Assesment of Current Techniques for Determining Tracheal Luminal Stenosis in Dogs. Am J Vet Res. 58: 1051-1054.
22. Hedlund CS. (1984). Tracheal Anastomosis in the Dog Comparison of Two End-To-End Techniques. Vet Surg. 13: 135-142.
23. Shih JY, Lee LN, Wu HD, Yu CJ, Wang HC, Chang YL, Yang PC. (1997). Sonographic Imaging of the Trachea. J Ultrasound Med. 16: 773-790.
24. Fike JR, Druy EM, Zook BC, Davis DO, Thompson JE, Chaney E, Bradley EW. (1980). Canine Anatomy as Assessed by Computerized Tomography. AmJ Vet Res. 41: 1823-1832. 25. Walter PA. (1999). Alternative Imaging Technologies Computed Tomography. In: Lavin LM (Editor). Radiog-raphy in Veterinary Technology. Philadelphia: Saunders. 318-320.
26. Griscom NT, Wohl ME. (1986). Dimensions of the Growing Trachea Related to Age and Gender. Am J Roentgeııol. 146:233-237
27. Shamberger RC, Holzman RS, Griscom T, Tarbell NJ, Weinstein HJ. (1991). CT Quantitation of Tracheal Cross-Sectional Area as a Guide to the Surgical and Anesthetic Management of Children with Anterior Mediastinal Masses. J Pediatr Surg. 26: 138-142.
28. Roditi GH, Weir J. (1994). The Association of Trache-omegaly and Bronchiectasis. Clin Radiol. 49: 608-611.
29. Mori M, Ikemune MD, Hiasa H. (2001). Stenosis of the Trachea Caused by Retrosternal Ossification. Ann Thorac Surg. 71: 1035-1037.
30. Chen JD, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Kileen KL, Dutton RP. (2001). Using CT to Diagnose Tracheal Rupture. Am J Roentgenol. 176: 1273-1280.
31. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. (2018). Köpek ve Kedide Thorax. In: Hazıroğlu RM, Çakır A. (Editors). Veteriner Anatomi Konu Anlatımı ve Atlas. 4. Baskı, Güneş Kitabevleri, Ankara. 420-433.