Top 100 Cited Articles On Geriatric Hip Fractures İn Orthopaedics: A Bibliometric And Visualised Analysis
Top 100 Cited Articles On Geriatric Hip Fractures İn Orthopaedics: A Bibliometric And Visualised Analysis
Objective: Hip fracture is one of the most critical health problems which the orthopaedic surgeons faced in the elderly population. Geriatric hip fractures are common, leading to high mortality and morbidity. The aim of the study is to analyze the current status of hip fractures, global trends, and clinical research status.
Methods: Top hundred articles related to the geriatrci hip fractures were taken from the Web of Science Core Collection. Basic information including number of citations, of publication, the authors, title, country , and year journal was extracted. The keywords were visualized using the VOSviewer.
Results: After the application of the study criteria, it was observed that there were 591 articles published between 1980-2020. Among the 100 articles, there were totally 7,376 citations. There were averagely 73.76 citations per article. A total of 419 authors, 168 institutes and 23 nations and regions published relevant articles. The most used keywords were hip fracture, mortality, and elderly.
Conclusion: In this study , the first 100 articles summarised can help researchers characterise outstanding literature in this field, figure out the history of hip fracture research in the elderly, and plan future research. Geriatric hip fractures result in situations extending far beyond orthopedics that concern many disciplines such as preventive medicine ,epidemiology, endocrinology,internal medicine, gerontology, and critical care. Research, interest, and publications continue to grow.
___
- 1. Zuckerman JD. Hip Fracture. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1519–25.
- 2. Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury. 2018; 49.8: 1458-60.
- 3. Murat M; Ermutlu C. Opere Kalça Kırığı Olgularında D Vitamini ve Biokimyasal Parametrelerin Değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi. 2020; 47.2: 446-54.
- 4. von Friesendorff M, McGuigan FE, Wizert A, et al. Hip fracture, mortality risk, and cause of death over two decades. Osteoporos Int. 2016; 27.10: 2945-53.
- 5. Prestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O, et al. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: A prospective, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015; 385.9978: 1623-33.
- 6. Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Tatagari S, et al. Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian journal of andrology. 2016; 18.2: 296.
- 7. Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics. 2015; 105.3: 1809-31.
- 8. Yalcinozan M. Fifty most cited Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology articles in international literature: A bibliometric analysis. Ann Med Res. 2020; 27: 1013–22.
- 9. Gurbuz Y, Sugun T, Turc KO-AOT, et al. A bibliometric analysis of orthopedic publications originating from Turkey. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015; 49.1: 57-66.
- 10. Lefaivre KA, Shadgan B, O’Brien PJ. 100 Most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2011; 469.5: 1487-97.
- 11. Garfield E. [The impact factor and its rightful use]. Anaesthesist 1998; 47: 439–40.
- 12. Kulkarni A V., Aziz B, Shams I, et al. Comparisons of citations in web of science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Jama. 2009; 302.10: 1092-6.
- 13. Aggarwal A, Lewison G, Idir S, et al. The state of lung cancer research: A global analysis. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2016; 11.7: 1040-50.
- 14. Peng G, Guan Z, Hou Y, et al. Depicting developing trend and core knowledge of hip fracture research: a bibliometric and visualised analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16: 174.
- 15. Bertoli-Barsotti L, Lando T. A theoretical model of the relationship between the h-index and other simple citation indicators. Scientometrics. 2017; 111.3: 1415-48.
- 16. Masic I, Begic E. Scientometric dilemma: Is H index adequate for scientific validity of academic’s work? Acta Informatica Medica. 2016; 24.4: 228.
- 17. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010; 84.2: 523-38.
- 18. Liang C, Luo A, Zhong Z. Knowledge mapping of medication literacy study: A visualized analysis using CiteSpace. SAGE open medicine. 2018; 6: 2050312118800199.
- 19. Liang YD, Li Y, Zhao J, et al. Study of acupuncture for low back pain in recent 20 years: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace. Journal of pain research. 2017; 10: 951.
- 20. E Fonseca B de PF, Sampaio RB, Fonseca MV de A, et al. Co-authorship network analysis in health research: Method and potential use. Health research policy and systems. 2016; 14.1: 1-10.
- 21. Pavlopoulos GA, Promponas VJ, Ouzounis CA, et al. Biological information extraction and co occurrence analysis. Biomedical literature mining. 2014; 77-92.
- 22. Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Wallden B. Prognostic indicators and early home rehabilitation in elderly patients with hip fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1980; 152: 173-84.
- 23. Bohl DD, Shen MR, Hannon CP, et al. Serum albumin predicts survival and postoperative course following surgery for geriatric hip fracture. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2017; 99.24: 2110-8.
- 24. White BL, Fisher WD, Laurin CA. Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980’s. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 1987; 69.9: 1335-40.
- 25. Bastian S, Ippolito JA, Lopez SA, et al. The use of the h-index in academic orthopaedic surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume. 2017; 99.4: e14.
- 26. Hesketh KR, Law C, Bedford H, et al. Co occurrence of health conditions during childhood: Longitudinal findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS). PloS one. 2016; 11.6: e0156868.
- 27. Luukkonen T. Invited review article: Bibliometrics and evaluation of Research performance. Ann Med. 1990; 22: 145–50.
- 28. Liang Z, Luo X, Gong F, et al. Worldwide research productivity in the field of arthroscopy: A bibliometric analysis. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2015; 31: 1452–7.
- 29. Perez-Iratxeta C, Andrade MA. Worldwide scientific publishing activity. Science. 2002; 297.5581: 519-20.