Comparison of Effects of Ketamine, Esmolol and Lidocaine on Propofol Injection Pain

Objective: Propofol is the most frequently used agent for intravenous anesthesia administration. However, during propofol injection, pain may develop in the hand and forearm region and cause unwanted situations. Different applications have been used to prevent propofol injection pain. Although lidocaine is often used for proprofol injection pain, anesthetic agent ketamine, which has an analgesic feature, is also preferred. In recent years, the analgesic feature of esmolol, a short-acting beta blocker, has been emphasized. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of three different agents, ketamine, esmolol or lidocaine, on the severity of pain developing by propofol injection. Also, hemodynamic effects were investigated. Methods: Sixty cases in ASA groups I and II, aged from 18 to 80 years old undergoing elective operations included in the study. To reduce the pain due to propofol injection, patients were given either 0.5 mg/kg ketamine, 0.5 mg/kg esmolol HCl or 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine. For induction 1% propofol injection was administered, presence and severity of pain in the arm was questioned and recorded. To evaluate the severity of pain developing due to propofol injection, a 4-point numerical scale was used (no pain: 1, mild pain: 2, moderate pain: 3 and severe pain: 4). Arm pull motion was also recorded. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups according to the severity of pain and pulling arm rates. There was no significant difference between hemodynamic parameters in the groups preoperatively, first, 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th and 30th minute. Conclusion: Ketamine, esmolol, and lidocaine can safely control the severity of pain developing by propofol injection. Esmolol, ketamine and lidocaine provided effective analgesia at the doses used in our study without affecting the hemodynamic findings of the patients. Keywords: Propofol injection pain, analgesic effect, esmolol, ketamine, lidocaine

Comparison of Effects of Ketamine, Esmolol and Lidocaine on Propofol Injection Pain

Objective: Propofol is the most frequently used agent for intravenous anesthesia administration. However, during propofol injection, pain may develop in the hand and forearm region and cause unwanted situations. Different applications have been used to prevent propofol injection pain. Although lidocaine is often used for proprofol injection pain, anesthetic agent ketamine, which has an analgesic feature, is also preferred. In recent years, the analgesic feature of esmolol, a short-acting beta blocker, has been emphasized. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of three different agents, ketamine, esmolol or lidocaine, on the severity of pain developing by propofol injection. Also, hemodynamic effects were investigated. Methods: Sixty cases in ASA groups I and II, aged from 18 to 80 years old undergoing elective operations included in the study. To reduce the pain due to propofol injection, patients were given either 0.5 mg/kg ketamine, 0.5 mg/kg esmolol HCl or 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine. For induction 1% propofol injection was administered, presence and severity of pain in the arm was questioned and recorded. To evaluate the severity of pain developing due to propofol injection, a 4-point numerical scale was used (no pain: 1, mild pain: 2, moderate pain: 3 and severe pain: 4). Arm pull motion was also recorded. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups according to the severity of pain and pulling arm rates. There was no significant difference between hemodynamic parameters in the groups preoperatively, first, 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th and 30th minute. Conclusion: Ketamine, esmolol, and lidocaine can safely control the severity of pain developing by propofol injection. Esmolol, ketamine and lidocaine provided effective analgesia at the doses used in our study without affecting the hemodynamic findings of the patients.

___

  • 1. Stark R, Binks S, Dutka V, et al. A review of thesafetyandtoler¬ance of propofol (Diprivan) PostgradMed J 1984; 61: 152-6.
  • 2. Lui JT, Huang SJ, Yang CY, et al. Rocuroniuminduced generalized spontaneous movements cause pulmonary aspiration. Chang Gung Med J 2002; 25: 617-20.
  • 3. Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, et al. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2011; 15:342.
  • 4. Picard P andTramer MR. Prevention of pain on injection with propofol: a quantitative system¬atic review. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 963-9.
  • 5. Demir A, Aydınlı B, Tezcan, et al. Influence of Temperature and pH Changes on Propofol Injection Pain. Turk J Anaesth Reanim 2013; 41: 34-7.
  • 6. Sun J, Zhou R, Lin W, et al. Magnesium sulfate plus lidocaine reduces propofol injection pain: a doubleblind, randomized study. Clin Ther 2016; 38: 31-8.
  • 7. Sapate M, Andurkar U, Markandeya M, et al. To study the effect of injection dexmedetomidine for prevention of pain dueto propofol injection and to compare it with injection lignocaine. Braz J Anesthesiol 2015; 65: 466-9.
  • 8. Uliana GN, Tambara EM, Baretta GA. Use of remifentanil to reduce propofol injection pain and the required propofol dose in upper digestive tract endoscopy diagnostic tests. Braz J Anesthesiol 2015; 65: 437-4.
  • 9. Kizilcik N, Menda F, Bilgen S, et al. Effects of a fentanyl-propofol mixture on propofol injection pain: a randomized clinical trial. Korean J Anesthesiol 2015; 68: 556-60.
  • 10. Karbasy S.H, Bahador R. Theeffects of nitroglycerine on pain control during the propofol injection; a controlled, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med 2015;5: e26141.
  • 11. M, Zhao X, Zhang L, et al. Effects and safety of magnesium sulfate on propofol-induced injection pain, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8: 6813-21.
  • 12. Sarkılar G, Kara İ, Duman A, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine on paincaused by injectıon of propofol. Nobel Med 2012; 8: 83-8.
  • 13. Nishimoto R, Kashio M, Tominaga M. Propofolinduced pain sensation involves multiple mechanisms in sensoryneurons. Propofol-induced pain sensationin volves multiple mechanisms in sensoryneurons. Pflugers Arch 2015;467: 2011-20.
  • 14. Nakane M, Iwoma H. A potential mechanism of propofol-induced pain on injection based on studies using nafamostat mesilate. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 397-404.
  • 15. Zahedi H, Nikooseresht M, Seifrabie M. Prevention of propofol injectionpainwith smalldoseketamine. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2009; 20: 401-4.
  • 16. Wang M, Wang Q, Yu YY, Wang WS. An effectivedose of ketamine for eliminating pain during injection of propofol: a dose response study. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2013;32: e103-6.
  • 17. Zhao GY, Guo Y, Bao SM, Meng LX, Zhang LH. Prevention of propofol-induced pain in children: pretreatment with small doses of ketamine. J Clin Anesth 2012; 24: 284-8.
  • 18. Iwata M, Inoue S, Kawaguchi M, et al. Ketamine eliminates propofol pain but does not affect hemodynamics during induction with double-lumen tubes. J Anesth 2010;24: 31-7.
  • 19. Masaki E. Antinociceptive effects of landiolol and esmolol. Masui. 2006;55: 849-55.
  • 20. Ergil J, Kavak Akelma F, Özkan D, et al. Effects of pretreatment with esmolol and lidocaine on injection pain and rocuronium-induced with drawal response. Turk J MedSci 2015;45: 959-63.
  • 21. Yavascaoglu B, Kaya FN, Ozcan B. Esmolol pretreatment reduces the frequency and severity of 2007;19: 413-7.
  • 22. Akgün SE, Titiz L, Akpek E, Arslan G. Pretreatment with a very low dose of intravenous esmolol reduces propofol injection pain. Ağrı 2013; 25: 13-8.
  • 23. Kelsaka E , B arış S , T epe Ş , e t a l . P ropofol Enjeksiyon Ağrısının Önlenmesinde Ondansetron Ve Lidokainin Karşılaştırılması. J Exp Clin Med 2009; 19: 263-7.
  • 24. Tian S, Zhang D, Zhou W, et al. Median Effective Dose of Lidocaine for the Prevention of ain Caused by the Injection of Propofol Formulated with Medium- and Long-Chain Triglycerides Based on Lean Body Weight. Pain Med 2021 4;22: 1246-52.
  • 25. Ghimire B, Bahadur Chand M. Lidocaine for Reduction of Pain Induced by Propofol in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2021 30;59: 365-8.
  • 26. Ayatollahi V, Behdad S, Kargar S, Yavari T. Comparison of effects of ephedrine, lidocaine and ketamine with placebo on injection pain, hypotension and bradycardia due to propofol injection: a randomized placebo controlled clinical trial. Acta Medica Iranica 2012; 50: 609-14.
Dicle Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-2945
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1963
  • Yayıncı: Cahfer GÜLOĞLU
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of the Modified HASBLED Score for Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Patients with COVID-19

Burhan ASLAN, Ümit İNCİ, Ferhat IŞIK, Mehmet Zülküf KARAHAN, Murat ÇAP, İsmail TATLI, Bedrettin BOYRAZ, Metin OKŞUL

Tubal Reanastomoz Sonrası Gebelik Sonuçları: Yeni Bir Teknik

Adnan YENER, Burak GİRAY

The Determinants of Academic Achievement in Medical Students: a Cross-Sectional Designed Multifactorial Approach

Aslı KARAKILIÇ, Hayrettin KARA, Haydar Ali ERKEN, Gülten ERKEN, Ahmet Burak FİLİK

Which one Affects More to Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Pediatric Calcaneus Fractures? Is the Severity of Trauma or the Applied Surgical Technique?

Seyhmus YİGİT, Emin OZKUL, Ramazan ATİC, Veysel KANDEMİR, Ali TURGUT, Azad YILDIRIM

Results of Minimally Invasive Methods in the Treatment of Liver Hydatid Cyst

Erkan DALBAŞI, Abidin TÜZÜN

Changes in medical oncology practice due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey, and the risk of neglect of cancer patients

Zeynep ORUC, Muhammet Ali KAPLAN, Abdurrahman ISİKDOGAN

Kan Kültürlerinde Üretilen Yoğun Bakım Ünitesi Hastalarında Candida Epidemiyolojisi ve Antifungal Direnç Değişiminin İncelenmesi, 2015-2019

Kamuran ŞANLI, Selen Z. MART KÖMÜRCÜ, Ayça Sultan ŞAHİN

Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors

Ozgen Ahmet YİLDİRİM, Kerem POYRAZ, Erkan ERDUR, Canan CAN, Cihan GUNDOGAN, Halis YERLİKAYA, Serdar YİLDİRİM, Yunus GUZEL, Halil KÖMEK

Effects of Rhodiola rosea on indomethacin-induced gastric injury

Irmak Ferah OKKAY, Ufuk OKKAY, Ozhan KARATAS

Fibrinogen to Albumin Ratio Predicts Burden of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with NSTEMI

Muhammed DEMİR, Mehmet ÖZBEK, Adem AKTAN, Faruk ERTAŞ