Dinan DEMİRÖZ, Nihat KILIÇ, Hüsamettin OKTAY

TREATMENT OF EARLY CLASS III MALOCCLUSION WITH BUÑO APPLIANCE

Abstract: Skeletal Class III malocclusion is one of the most challenging, complex and difficult problems to treat. Functional orthopedic appliances can produce favorable outcomes during early mixed dentition in cases with Class III malocclusion. The purpose of this case report was to present a successfully treated 8-years-old female patient having skeletal Class III malocclusion due to maxillary retrusion by means of a simple Class III corrector, the bimaxillar prognathism upper plate according to Buño. Key words: Class III malocclusion, Class III corrector ERKEN SINIF 3 MALOKLUZYONUN BUÑO APAREYİ İLE TEDAVİSİÖz İskeletsel Sınıf III malokluzyon tedavisi en zor ve karmaşık problemlerden biridir. Fonksiyonel ortopedik apareyler erken karışık dişlenme dönemimdeki Sınıf III malokluzyonlu vakalarda olumlu sonuçlar oluşturabilir. Bu vaka raporunun amacı, maksiller retrüzyona bağlı olarak gelişen iskeletsel Sınıf III malokluzyonlu 8 yaşındaki bir kız çocuğunun basit bir Sınıf III düzeltme apareyi (“Buno apareyi) ile başarılı şekilde tedavisini göstermektir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sınıf III maloklüzyon, Sınıf III

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Class III malocclusion, Class III corrector

PDF

___

1. A.J Kapust, P.M Sinclair and P.K Turley, “Cephalometric effects of face mask/expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 204-212, 1998.
2. B. Cai, X. Zhao and Lu. Xiang, “Orthodontic decompensation and correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion with gradual dentoalveolar remodeling in a growing patient,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 367-80, 2014.
3. P. Cozza, A. Marino and M. Mucedero, “An orthopaedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusions in the early mixed dentition,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 191-199, 2004.
4. R. Miethke, S. Lindenau and K. Dietrich, “The effect of Fränkel’s function regulator type III on the apical base,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 311-318, 2003.
5. F. Falck and K. Zimmermann, “Cephalometric changes in the treatment of Class III using the Fränkel appliance,” Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 99-109, 2008.
6. R. Frankel, “Maxillary retrusion in Class III and treatment with the function corrector III,” Trans Eurupean Orthodontic Society, pp. 249-259, 1970.
7. http://www.o-atlas.de/eng/kapitel4_126.php
8. J. A. McNamara Jr., “An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients,” Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 598–608, 1987.
9. F. P. Ferreira, M. D. Goulart, R. R. de Almeida-Pedrin, A. C. Conti, M. A. Cardoso. Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: Atypical Extraction Protocol. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2017;2017:4652685. doi: 10.1155/2017/4652685
10. J. Sugawara, Z. Aymach, H. Hin and R. Nanda, “One-phase vs 2-phase treatment for developing Class III malocclusion: a comparison of identical twins,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. e11-22, 1968.
11. J. Jiang, J. Lin, C. Ji, “Two-stage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion during the early permanent dentition, ” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 520-527, 2005.
12. Z. Kanno, Y. Kim and K. Soma “Early correction of a developing skeletal Class III malocclusion, ” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 549-556, 2007.
13. M. Ülgen and F. Sönmez, “The effects of the Frankel's function regulator on the Class III malocclusion,”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 561-567, 1994.