The scolocidal effect of propolis on pro- toscoleces and daugther cysts

Amaç: Günümüzde skolosidal ajanlar hidatik kist sıvısının tedavi sırasında kistin dışınadağılmasını önlemek amacıyla kullanılmaktadır. Etkili bir skolosidin protoskoleksler üzerindekietkisinin yanı sıra, toksik olmayan, kolay uygulanabilen sklerozan kolanjit oluşturmayan ve kızveziküllerin de içine nüfuz edebilen özelliklere sahip olması beklenmektedir. Bu çalışmada doğalbir arı ürünü olan propolisin skolosidal etkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: Çalışmada, karaciğer hidatik kisti bulunan bir hastadan operasyon sırasında elde edilen,kız veziküller ve protoskoleksler ve Karadeniz bölgesinde elde edilen propolis kullanılmıştır.Canlılık tesbiti %0,1lik Eosin solüsyonu kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Propolis DMSO içindeçözülerek, %0,9luk serum fizyolojik içinde 50 mg/mL ile 0,010 mg/mL arasında sulandırılmıştır(4000 protoskoleks/mL) ve tüplere 100er µl dağıtılmıştır. Farklı konsantrasyonlardaki propolisin1.,3.,5.,10.,20.,ve 30. dakikalarda protoskoleksler üzerine etkisi hemositometre lamında sayımyapılarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, 4 ila7 mm boyutlarında olan çok sayıdaki kız veziküllere 0,80 ve3,12 mg/mLde hazırlanan propolis uygulanmış,5.,10.,20.,30., dakikalarda kistler açılarakiçlerindeki protoskolekslerin canlılık durumları araştırılmıştır.Bulgular: Propolisin 0,100 mg/mLde ilk dakikada, 0,050 mg/mLde 3. dakikada, 0,025mg/mLde 10. dakikada, 0,010 mg/mLde 20. dakikada protoskoleksler üzerine öldürücü etkisigözlenmiştir. Kız veziküller içindeki protokoleksler 0,80 mg/mLlik konsantrasyonda 20. dakikadaprotoskolekslerin %50si, 3,12 mg/mLlik konsantrasyonda 10. dakikada ise tamamı etkilenmiştir.Sonuç: Özellikle, 10 dakika gibi kısa bir sürede kız veziküllere de etki edebilen doğal maddepropolisin skolosidal ajan olarak kullanılabileceği ve bu konuda daha ileri çalışmalara gereksinimolduğu kanısına varılmıştır.

Propolisin protoskoleksler ve kız kistler üzerine skolosidal etkisi

Objective: Scolocidal elements are used in the aim of not scattering the protoscoleces outside thecyst during the treatment of cyst hydatid in our present-day. It is hoped from the scolocidalmaterials; besides its effect on protoscoleces, not being toxic, being easy practicable, not causingsclerozan cholanjit and if possible, penetrating in the daughter vesicules. In this research, the effectof propolis which is a bee product on protoscoleces were investigated.Methods: In our work, daughter vesicules and protoscoleces obtain from the liver of a patientduring surgery and propolis from the Black Sea Region were used. Viability tests were done byusing 0.1% eosine solution. After propolis disolved in dimethylsulfoxide, within the range of 50mg/mL and 0.010 mg/mL using by 0.9% serum physiological solution 100 µl into each of the tubeand in 1.,3.,5.,10.,20.,and 30. minutes the rates of viability of protoscolex (4000 protoscolex/mL)are fixed. The research were subjected to daughter vesicules that is 4-7 mm in diameters. Theconcentration of propolis at 0.80 and 3.12 mg/mL were investigated viability rates of protoscolexat different incubation time and whether the possibilty of penetration to the daughter vesicules.Results: It was seen that protoscolexs were effected by the Propolis at 0.100 mg/mL concentrationin the first minute, at 0.050 mg/mL concentration in the 3. minutes, at 0.025 mg/mL concentrationat 10. minutes and at 0.010 mg/mL concentration in 20. minutes. For protoscolex in the vesiculesat 0.80 mg/mL concentration in 20. minute, in 3.12 mg/mL concentration in 10. minutes werefound to be lethal.Conclusions: As the protoscolex could be killed by Propolis which penetrate to daughter cysts in avery short time as 10 minutes, we thing that it will be beneficial completing advanced studies.

___

  • 1. Saygı G. Hydatidosis in Turkey within the Last Fourteen Years (1979-1993). Cumhuriyet University press, Sivas, Turkey 1996.
  • 2. Besim H, Karayalçın K, Hamamcı O, Güngör Ç, Korkmaz A. Scolicidal agents in hydatid cyst surgery. HPB.Surgery 1998; 10: 347- 51.
  • 3. Karayalçın K, Besim H, Sonisik M, Erverdi N, Korkmaz A, Aras N. Effect of Hypertonic Saline and Alcohol on Viability of Daughter cysts in Hepatic Hydatid Disease. European J Surg 1999; 165: 1043- 4.
  • 4. Kayaalp C, Balkan M, Aydın C, Özgürtaş T, Tanyüksel M, Kirimlioğlu V, Akoğlu M, Öner K, Pekcan M. Hypertonic Saline in Hydatid Disease. World S.Surg 2001; 25: 975-9.
  • 5. Puryan K, Karadayı K, Topçu S, Canbay E, Sümer Z, Turan M, Karayalçın K, Şen M. Chlorhexi- dine Glucanote. An ideal Scolicid- al agent in the treatment of intra- peritoneal Hydatidosis W.J. Sur- gery 2005; 29: 227-30.
  • 6. Aliyazıcıoğlu Y, Değer O, Ovali E, Barlak Y, Hosver I, Tekelioğlu Y, Karahan SC. Effects of Turkish polen and propolis extracts on re- spratory burst for K-562 cell lines. International Immonopharmacolo- gy 2005; 5: 1652-7.
  • 7. Bankova V. Recent trends and im- portant developments in propolis research. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2005; 2: 29-32.
  • 8. Uzel A, Sorkun K, Önçağ Ö, Çoğulu D, Gençay Ö, Salih B. Chemical compositions and antimicrobial activities of four different Anatolian propolis samples. Microbiol Res 2005; 160: 189-95.
  • 9. Salomão K, Dantas AP, Borba CM, Campos LC, Machado DG, Aquino Neto FR, de Castro SL. Chemical composition and micro- bicidal activity of extracts from Brazilian and Bulgarian propolis. Lett Appl Microbiol 2004; 38: 87- 92.
  • 10. Marcucci MC, Ferreres F, Garcia- Viguera C, Bankova VS. Phenolic compounds from Brazilian propo- lis with pharmacological activities J. Ethnopharmacol 2001; 74: 105- 12.
  • 11. Marcucci MC. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidolo- gie 1995; 26: 83-99.
  • 12. Mercan N, Kıvrak I, Duru ME, Katırcıoğlu H, Gülcan S, Mala S, Acar G, Salih B. Chemical compo- sition effects onto microbial and antioxidant activities of propolis collected from different regions of Turkey. Annals of Microbiology 2006; 56: 373-8.
  • 13. Miyataka H, Nishiki M, Matsumo- to H, Fujimoto T, Matsuka M, Satoh T. Evaluation of propolis. I. Evaluation of Brazilian and Chi- nese propolis by enzymatic and physico-chemical methods. Biol Pharm Bull 1997; 20: 496-501.
  • 14. Amaros M, Lurton E, Boustie J, Gire L, Sauvager F, Cormier M. Comparison of the anti-Herpes simplex virus activities of propolis and. J Nat Prod 1994; 57: 644-7.
  • 15. Bosio K, Avanzini C, D’avolio A, Ozino O, Savoia D. In vitro activi- ty of propolis against Streptococ- cus pyogenes. Lett Appl Microbiol 2000; 31: 174-7.
  • 16. Kartal M, Yıldız S, Kaya S, Kurucu S, Topçu G. Antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from two different regions of Anatolia. J Ethnopharmacol 2003; 86: 69-73.
  • 17. Murad JM, Calvi SA, Soares AMVC, Bankova V, Sforcin JM. Effect of propolis from Brasil and Bulgaria on fungucidal activity of macrophages against Paracoccidi- odies brasiliensis. J Ethnopharma- col 2002; 79: 331-4.
  • 18. Orsi RO, Sforcin JM, Funari SRC, Bankova V. Effects of Brazilian and Bulgarian propolis on bacteri- cidal activity of macrophages against Salmonella Typhimurium. Int Immunopharmacol 2005; 5: 359-68.
  • 19. Popova M, Silici S, Kaftanoğlu O, Bankova V. Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualita- tive and quantitative chemical composition. Phytomedicine 2005; 12: 221-8.
  • 20. Sforcin JM, Fernandes J.R.A, Lopes C.A.M, Bankova V. Sea- sonal effect on Brazilian propolis antibacterial activity, J. Eth- nopharmacol 2000; 73: 243-9.
  • 21. Yıldırım Z, Hacıevliyagil S, Kutlu NO, Aydın NE, Kurkcuoglu M, Iraz M, Durmaz R. Effect of water extract of Turkish propolis on tu- berculosis infection in guinea-pigs. Pharmacol Res 2004; 49: 287-92.
  • 22. Özan F, Polat ZA, Er K, Özan Ü, Değer O. Effect of propolis on survival of periodontal ligament cells: New storage Media for avulsed Teeth. Journal of Endo- dontics 2007; 33: 570-3
  • 23. Öztürk F, Kurt E, Cerci M. The ef- fect of propolis extract in experi- mental chemical corneal injury. Ophthalmic Res 2000; 32: 13-8.
  • 24. Cunha IBS, Salamo K, Shımızu M, Bankava VS. Antitrypanosomal activity of Brazilian propolis from Apis mellifera. Chem Pharm Bull 2004; 52: 602-4.
  • 25. De Castro L, K.O. Higashi, Effect of different formulations of propo- lis on mice infected with Trypano- soma cruzi, J. Ethnopharmacol 1995; 46: 55-8.
  • 26. Higashi KO, S.L. de Castro. Prop- olis extracts are effective against Trypanosoma cruzi and have an impact on its interaction with host cells, J. Ethnopharmacol 1994; 43: 149-55.
  • 27. Prytzyk E, Dantas AP, Salomao K. Flavonoids and trypanocidal activ- ity of Bulgarian propolis. J. Eth- nopharmacol 2003; 88: 189-93
  • 28. Freitas SF, Shinohara L, Sforcin JM, Guimares S. In vitro effects of propolis on Giardia duodenalis trophozoites. Phytomedicine 2006; 13: 170-5.
  • 29. Ferreira FM, CastroRA, Batista MA, Rossi FM, Silveira-Lemos D, Frézard F, Moura SA, Rezende SA. Association of water extract of green propolis and liposomal me- glumine antimoniate in the treat- ment of experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Parasitol Res 2014; 113: 533-43.
  • 30. Duran N, Muz M, Culha G, Duran G, Ozer B. GC-MS analysis and antileishmanial activities of two Turkish propolis types. Parasitol Res 2011; 108: 95-105.
  • 31. da Silva SS, Thomé Gda S, Cata- neo AH, Miranda MM, Felipe I, Andrade CG, Watanabe MA, Pi- ana GM, Sforcin JM, Pavanelli WR, Conchon-Costa I. Brazilian propolis antileishmanial and im- munomodulatory effects. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 673058.
  • 32. Monzote Fidalgo L, Sariego Ra- mos I, García Parra M, Cuesta- Rubio O, Márquez Hernández I, Campo Fernández M, Piccinelli AL, Rastrelli L. Activity of Cuban propolis extracts on Leishmania amazonensis and Trichomonas vaginalis. Nat Prod Commun 2011; 6: 973-6.
  • 33. Duran G, Duran N, Culha G, Ozcan B, Oztas H, Ozer B. In vitro antileishmanial activity of Adana propolis samples on Leishmania tropica: a preliminary study. Parasitol Res 2008; 102: 1217-25.
  • 34. Kismet K, Kilicoglu SS, Kilicoglu B, Erel S, Gencay O, Sorkun K, Erdemli E, Akhan O, Akkus MA, Sayek I. The effects of scolicidal agent propolis on liver and biliary tree.J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 1406-11.
  • 35. Kismet K, Kilicoglu B, Koru O, Tanyuksel M, Oruc MT, Sorkun K, Salih B, Akkus MA. Evaluation on scolicidal efficacy of propolis. Eur Surg Res 2006.
Cumhuriyet Tıp Dergisi (ELEKTRONİK)-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi