Determination of the Effects of Speed Bumps on Driver Speeds Via Mobile Cameras and A Survey Application

Kasisler Türkiye'de özellikle yoğun yaya ve bisikletlilerin bulunduğu güzergâhlarda trafiği sakinleştirmeye yönelik en fazla kullanılan önlemlerdir. Bu makalede bir üniversite kampüsü içindeki yol ağında, öğrenci ve personellerin yaşam kalitesini artırmak amacıyla yapılan trafiği sakinleştirme çalışmalarının örnek uygulamaları ve sonuçları anlatılmaktadır. Akdeniz Üniversite kampüsü sınırları içinde 50 km/s hız limitine sahip bir güzergâha kurulan mobil ortalama hız sistemi yardımı ile kasis uygulamalarının sürücü hızlarına etkisi değerlendirilmektedir. Mevcut güzergâhta kasis varken kaydedilen sürücü ortalama hızları, kasis yokken kaydedilen ortalama hızlarla kıyaslanmıştır. Bu makalede, sürücülerin hız davranışlarını azaltması yönünde etkili olduğu tespit edilen kasisler hakkındaki sürücü görüşlerinin de araştırıldığı bir çalışma sunulmaktadır. Her ne kadar sürücü hızları düşmüş olsa da, anket sonuçlarına göre sürücülerin %50'si kampüs içerisindeki kasis sıklığının fazla olduğunu düşünmektedir. Bu çalışmada, kampüs yol ağı kullanımında tüm ulaşım türleri (yaya, bisiklet, toplu taşım, otomobil) arasındaki dağılımında dengeli bir yaklaşımın geliştirilmesi ve kaza oranlarının düşmesi için sürücülerin yasal hız limitlerine uyması gerektiğini vurgulanmaktadır

Kasislerin Sürücü Hızları Üzerindeki Etkisinin Mobil Hız Kameraları ile Tesbiti ve Bir Anket Uygulaması

Speed bumps are the most frequently used in Turkey as precautions for traffic calming at pedestrian and bicycle intensive sections. In this article, exemplary traffic calming measures applied on the university campus road network for increasing the quality of life of students and personnel along with their results have been put forth. The effects of speed bump applications on driver speeds are evaluated by way of a mobile average speed enforcement system set up on a section inside the Akdeniz University campus with a speed limit of 50 km/h. The average speeds recorded at the current section with the speed bump in place were compared with the average speeds recorded when there was no speed bump. This article also puts forth a study in which driver opinions on speed bumps determined to be effective in decreasing the speeding behavior of drivers have been examined. Even though the driver speeds decreased, survey results put forth that 50 % of the drivers think that the frequency of speed bumps in the campus is very high. It is emphasized in this study that drivers should comply with the legal speed limits in order to be able to develop a balanced approach with regard to the distribution between all transportation types (pedestrian, bicycle, public transportation, automobile) for campus road network use and to be able to decrease rates of accidents

PDF

___

[1]. Kaygısız Ö., Trafiği Sakinleştirmeye Yönelik Önlemler. Aydoğdu Ofset, EGM Trafik Araştırma Merkezi Müdürlüğü, Katalog No:696, Ankara, 2012.
[2]. Pau M., Angius S., Do speed bumps really decrease traffic speed? An Italian experience. Accident Analysis & Prevention 33(5): 585–597, 2001.
[3]. WHO. Global status report on road safety 2015, Geneva, 2015.
[4]. Vet J.M., Thierry M.C., Horst A.R.A., Rahman A.K.M., The first integrated speed management program benefitting vulnerable road users in Bangladesh: results and implications for LMICs. In 17th International Conference Road Safety On Five Continents (RS5C 2016), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 17-19 May 2016 (pp. 1-21), 2016.
[5]. Cynecki M.J., Huang H.F., The Effects of Traffic Calming Measures on Pedestrian and Motorist Behavior. FHWA Report RD-00- 104, 2001
[6]. Patterson T., Local Area Traffıc Management Schemes / Traffıc Calmıng, Land Transport Safety Authority of New Zealand, Yeni Zelanda, 2004.
[7]. Taylor M.C., Lynam D.A., Baruya A., The Effects of Drivers’ Speed on the Frequency of Road Accidents. TRL Report No:421, 2000.
[8]. Roberts C.A., Brown-Esplain J., Technical Evaluation of Photo Speed Enforcement for Freeways, Arizona, 2005.
[9]. Gil M.J.M., Malenstein U.P.M.J., Innovative Technology for Monitoring Traffic, Vehicles and Drivers, Police Enforcement Policy and Programmes on European Roads. 6th Framework Programme, European Commission, Technical Report, 2007.
[10]. Speed Check Service. Temporary Roadworks Speed Enforcement - M6, 2007. Address: http://www.speedcheck.co.uk/pdf/M6%20T ASCAR%20case%20study.pdf
[11]. Speed Check Services, SPECS Safety Cameras-M4 10-12 Technology Upgrade, 2009. Address: http://www.speedcheck.co.uk/images/M4_ Case_Study.pdf
[12]. Speed Check Services, SPECS: Results, 2009. Address: http://www.speedcheck.co.uk/specs.htm
[13]. Young K.L., Regan M.A., Intelligent Transport Systems to Support Police Enforcement of Road Safety Laws. ATSB Research and Analysis Report No: 2007-02, 62p, 2007.
[14]. Cameron M., Development of Strategies for Best Practice in Speed Enforcement in Western Australia, Supplementary Report, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Melbourne, 2008.
[15]. Koy T, Benz S. Automatic Time-OverDistance Speed Checks İmpacts on Driving Behaviour and Traffic Safety. In the 6th ITS World Congress and Exhibition on Intelligent Transport Systems and Services, 2009.
[16]. Simcic G., Section Control: Towards a More Efficient and Better Accepted Enforcement of Speed Limits? Speed Fact Sheet 2, 2009. [17]. Soole D., Fleiter J., Watson B., Point-toPoint Speed Enforcement. Report No: APR415-12., 2012.
[18]. Soole D.W., Watson B.C., Fleiter J.J., Effects of Average Speed Enforcement on Speed Compliance and Crashes: A review of the Literature,. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2013, 54: 46-56.
[19]. Montella A, Punzo V, Chiaradonna S, Mauriello F, Montanino M., Point-to-Point Speed Enforcement System: Speed Limits Design Criteria and Analysis of Drivers’ Compliance. Transport. Res. Part C, 2015; 53: 1–18.
[20]. Speed Check Services, Temporary Roadworks Speed Enforcement - M1, 2006. Address: http://www.speedcheck.co.uk/pdf/M6%20T ASCAR%20case%20study.pdf
[21]. Australian Transport Council, National Road Safety Strategy 2011–2020, Australian Transport Council, 2011.
[22]. Cameron M.H., Diamantopoulou K., Clark B., Langford J., Identifying Traffic Enforcement Practices and Opportunities in Western Australia, 2011. Address: http://cmarc.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/ITEPOWA_ March2012.pdf
[23]. Lynch M., White M., Napier R., Investigation into the use of Point-to-Point Speed Cameras, NZ Transport Agency Research Report 465, 2011.
[24]. Soole D.W., Fleiter J.J., Watson B.C., Pointto-Point Speed Enforcement: Recommendations for Better Practice. Australasian Road Safety Research Policing and Education Conference, 28-30 August, 2013.
[25]. Høye A., Speed Cameras, Section Control, And Kangaroo Jumps – A Meta-Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2014; 73: 200-208.
[26]. Townsend E., Achterberg, F. Enforcement Monitor (No. 4). Brussels, Belguim: ETSC, 2005.
[27]. Crawford E., Beyond 2010 – A Holistic Approach to Road Safety in Great Britain. Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety, London, 2009.
[28]. Korthof E.W., Effects of Section Control on Traffic Safety at Dutch Motorways. Delft University of Technology, Master Thesis, 202, Delft, 2014.