Refreshment In The Literature Classroom

Edebi metinler kuşkusuz okuyucunun etkin katılımını vurgular. Bu da bireysel anlamların ortaya çıkabileceği yöntemleri kullanarak okuyucuların hazır bilgiyle donatılması yerine metinle devingen bir bağ kurmalarını sağlayarak yapılabilir. Bu makalede edebiyat dersinin (özellikle kısa öyküçözümlemesi) öğrencilerin daha bilinçli hale gelmelerini sağlayacak etkinliklere katılımlarını sağlayacak olan Okur Merkezli Kuram ile Kişisel Yapısalcı Teori’ nin birleştirilmesi yoluyla nasıl planlanabileceği tartışılmaktadır.

Refreshment In The Literature Classroom

Literary materials undoubtedly emphasize the active involvement of the reader which can be achieved by adopting procedures to activate personal meanings and thus encourage readers to form a dynamic interaction with the text instead of “bombarding” them with ready made information In this article we discuss how a literature course specifically short story analysis should be designed as to make learners be involved in reflective and awareness raising activities by means of integrating Reader Response Approach and Personal Construct Theory Key words: Personal Construct Theory Reader Response Theory ÖZET Edebi metinler kuşkusuz okuyucunun etkin katılımını vurgular Bu da bireysel anlamların ortaya çıkabileceği yöntemleri kullanarak okuyucuların hazır bilgiyle donatılması yerine metinle devingen bir bağ kurmalarını sağlayarak yapılabilir Bu makalede edebiyat dersinin özellikle kısa öyküçözümlemesi öğrencilerin daha bilinçli hale gelmelerini sağlayacak etkinliklere katılımlarını sağlayacak olan Okur Merkezli Kuram ile Kişisel Yapısalcı Teori’ nin birleştirilmesi yoluyla nasıl planlanabileceği tartışılmaktadır Anahtar Kelimeler: Kişisel Yapısalcı Yaklaşım Okur Merkezli Yaklaşım

___

  • Barnet, C, Cain, W. E. (2000). Learning to teach. London: Routledge.
  • Bock, S. (1993). Developing materials for the study of literature. English Teaching Forum, 31(3),2.
  • Brumfit, C, Carter, R. A. (1984). Literature and language teaching. London: Macmillan.
  • Carter , M., McRae, J. (Eds.). (1996). Language, literature, and the learner: Creative classroom practice. London: Longman.
  • Carter, R., Long, M. N. (1991=. Teaching literature. New York: Longman
  • Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Collie, J., Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Culler, J. (1997). Literary theory: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Pres
  • Davis, J. N. (1989). The act of reading in the foreign language : Pedagocical implications of Iser's reader response theory. The Modern language Journal, 73(3).
  • Fish, T. (2000). Some elements of structuralism and its application to literary theory. www.ai.mit.edu
  • Gorgun, A. (1999). The impact of pedagogical courses on student teachers' thinking. Unpublished M.A. dissertation. Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
  • Gutbezahl, K. (1994) in Gorgun, A The impact of pedagogical courses on student teachers' thinking. Unpublished M.A. dissertation. Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
  • Ibsen, E..B. (1990). The double role of fiction in foreign language learning: Towards a creative methodology, English Teaching Forum. 28(3), 3.
  • Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.
  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs: A theory of personality.New York: w. w.Norton & co. Inc.
  • Kesen, A. (1999). L2 learners' slf image: A study on the strategies employed in reading short stories in LI and L2. Unpublished M.A. dissertation. Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
  • Korthagen, F. A. J. (1993).Two modes of reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education,9(3).
  • Lazar, J. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leech, G. N., Short, M. H. (1989). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to fictional prose. London: Longman.
  • Lye, J. (1996). Reader- response: Various Positions, www.cnr.edu
  • Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Stevens, B. k., Stewart, L. L. (1996). A guide to literary critism and research. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  • Sendan, F. C. (1995). Patterns of development in EFL s student teachers' personal theories: A Constructivist Approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Reading.
  • Türeli, T. (1998). The place of literature in the English language teaching curriculum: A language-based ' approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
  • Wales, K. (1989). A dictionary of stylistics. London: Longman.
  • Wellek, R., Warren, A. (1984). Theroy of literature. Florida: Harcourt Brace Company