CAUSALITY TEST BETWEEN HUMAN CAPITAL AND PHYSICAL CAPITAL FOR JAPAN, INDIA AND INDONESIA BETWEEN THE PERIOD OF 1890 AND 2000

Fiziksel sermaye ile beşeri sermaye arasındaki tamamlayıcı bir ilişkinin olduğunu gösterir güçlü nedenler vardır ve bunun veriler tarafından da desteklenip desteklenmeyeceğine odaklanmaya çalışmaktayız. Bu nedenle de 1890- 2000 yılları arası veriler için Hindistan, Endonezya ve Japonya için fiziksel sermaye ve beşeri sermaye yatırımları arasında nedensellik ilişkisi varmıyı test etmeyi amaçladık. Bu üç ülke hem beşeri sermaye bakımından hem de teknolojik etkilenme bakımından dışsal etkilere daha yatkın olduklarından şeçilmişlerdir. Ölçümlememiz sonunda zayıfta olsa bir nedensellikten sözedilebileceği sonucuna vardık. Nedensellik Japonya için biraz daha net ifade edilebilir. Bu belki de Japonyanın daha planlı bir ekonomi olmasındandır. Ancak diğer iki ülke için nedensellik net değildir.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

xx

Causality Test Between Human Capital And Physical Capital For Japan India And Indonesia Between The Period Of 1890 And 2000

There are very strong reasons to believe that there is a complementary interaction between physical and human capital and whether this can be supported by data is tested Thus the aim of our study is to test for causality between investment in physical and human capital for India Indonesia and Japan between the period of 1890 to 2000 These three countries were subordinate to exogenous influences both in technology and human capital development Very weak causality has been found It may be said that it is little clearer for Japan This may be because of the fact that Japan is much better organized and planed economy than the others However for the rest it is not so clear at all Keywords: Unit root; Economic growth; Physical capital Human capital complementarities between physical and human capital and Granger causality error correction mechanism
Keywords:

xx,

___

  • Aron, J., (2000) “Growth and Institutions: A Review of the Evidence” The world Bank Research Observer, Vol. 15, no.1, pp:99-135.
  • Bas van Leeuwen (2007) “Human Capital and Economic Growth in India, Indonesia, and Japan: A quantitative analysis, 1890-2000” Printed in the Netherlands, ISBN: 978 90 8891 003 6
  • Bas van Leeuwen (2009) Lucas versus Romer: Human capital and economic growth in Asia 1890–2000,
  • Barro, R., and Sala-i-Martin, X. S (1995) “Economic Growth” McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  • Bulutay, T. (1995) “Yeni Büyüme Kuramları ve Büyüme, Kalkınma Konusuda Diğer Bazı Yaklaşımlar” Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı, ISBN 975-19-0986-4
  • Islam, N. (1995) “Growth Empirics”: A Panel Data Approach” Quarterly Journal Of Economics, 110, 4, 1127-70.
  • Kalyoncu, K (2008) “An Assessment of the Effect of Health and Nutritional Quality on Worker Effort and Economic Growth Through Physical and Human Capital: Cross-Country and Turkish Evidence”. PhD Thesis in MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12609606/index.pdf
  • Kalyoncu, K. and Kalyoncu, H., (2009) “The Empirics of the Imbalance Effect: Per-capita Income and Human to Physical Capital Ratio”, The Empirical Economics Letters, Volume 8, Number 2, February
  • Lee, J-W., (2007) “Economic Growth and Human Development in the Republic of Korea, 1945-1992” http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/soc/undp/oc24aa.htm.
  • Lucas, E. Robert, JR, (1990), "Why Doesn't Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries?" The American Economic Review, May, 92-96.
  • Ramcharan, R. (2004) “Higher or Basic Education? The Composition of Human Capital and Economic Development” IMF Staff Papers Vol. 51, No. 2, 2004 International Monetary Fund.
  • Rogers M. and Dowrick S. (1997) “Convergence and technology in the Solow-Swan growth model: an empirical analysis” working papers in economics and econometrics, The Australian National University.
  • Tansel,A.; Güngör,N.D. (1997). “Income and Growth Convergence: An Application to the Provinces of Turkey.” Paper presented at The First Annual ERC/METU Conference on Economics. September 18-20, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara