Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimine Firma Niteliklerinin Etkisi: Tekstil Sektörü Bakış Açısı

Kaynak kullanımının yoğun olduğu bilinen tekstil sektörü için sürdürülebilirlik çalışmalarının uygulanması ekonomik anlamda sektörün gelişmesini sağlayarak çevresel ve sosyal anlamda tedarik zinciri yönetiminin aşamalarında olumlu etki bırakacağı yadsınamaz bir gerçektir. Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanması için ele alınması gereken çok sayıda parametre bulunmaktadır. Tekstil sektörü ihtiyaçları doğrultusunda sürdürülebilirliği amaçlayan firmaların bu parametrelere göre ilerlemesi olası kaynak kayıplarını daha da azaltacaktır. Mevcut çalışma bu konuyu ele alarak tedarik zinciri yönetimi içerisinde sürdürülebilirliği etkileyen değişkenlerin araştırılmasını amaçlamaktadır. Firmaların sahip olduğu niteliklerin değişkenlerine göre belirlenen müşteri odaklı yaklaşım, teslimat odaklı yaklaşım, kaynak kullanımı ve ürün odaklı yaklaşım değişkenleri ile aralarındaki ilişki Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile ele alınmıştır. Çalışmada belirlenen 35 değişken beş gizli değişken içerisinde gruplandırılarak çıkan değerlerin etki düzeyleri belirlenmiştir. Etkili risk yönetimi, müşteri isteklerinin yerine getirilmesi, sipariş takibi, dönüştürülebilen ambalajın kullanılması, tahmin tekniklerinin doğruluğu değişkenlerinin etki düzeyleri en yüksek değişkenler olarak çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Sürdürülebilirlik, Tedarik zinciri yönetimi, Tekstil, Yapısal eşitlik modeli

The Effect of Company Qualifications on Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Textile Sector Perspective

It is an undeniable fact that the implementation of sustainability studies for the textile industry, which is known to be resource-intensive, will ensure the economic development of the industry and leave a positive impact on the stages of supply chain management in environmental and social terms. There are many parameters that need to be addressed in order to ensure sustainability in supply chain management. The progress of companies aiming at sustainability in line with the needs of the textile industry according to these parameters will further reduce possible resource losses. The present study aims to investigate the variables affecting sustainability in supply chain management by addressing this issue. The customer-oriented approach, delivery-oriented approach, resource use and product-oriented approach variables determined according to the variables of the qualifications of the companies and the relationship between them are discussed with the Structural Equation Model. The 35 variables determined in the study were grouped into five hidden variables and the effect levels of the values were determined. Effective risk management, fulfillment of customer requests, order tracking, use of recyclable packaging, accuracy of forecasting techniques have the highest effect levels.

Keywords:

Sustainability, Supply chain management, Textile, Structural equation model,

PDF

___

1. Slawinski, N., Bansal, P., 2015. Short On Time: Intertemporal Tensions in Business Sustainability. Organization Science, 26(2), 531-549.
2. Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. And Diabat, A., 2013. A Fuzzy Multi Criteriaapproachfor Evaluating Green Supplier’s Performance in Green Supply Chain With Linguisticpreferences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 170-179.
3. Veleva, V., Ellenbecker, M., 2001. Indicators of Sustainable Production: Framework and Methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(6), 519-549.
4. Carter, C.R., Rogers, D.S., 2008. A Framework of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Moving Toward New Theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.
5. Seuring, S., Müller, M., 2008. From a Literature Review to a Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
6. Çetiner, M., Tunca, M.Z., 2022. A Literature Review on Sustainable Fashion Marketing, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, .27(2), 291-315
7. Bruce, M., Daly, L., Towers, N., 2004. Lean or Agile: a Solution for Supply Chain Management in the Textiles and Clothing Industry?. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(2), 151-170.
8. Diabat, A., Kannan, D., Mathiyazhagan, K. 2014. Analysis of Enablers for Implementation Of Sustainable Supply Chain Management-A Textile Case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 391-403.
9. Freise, M., Seuring, S., 2015. Social and Environmental Risk Management in Supply Chains: A Survey in the Clothing Industry. Logistics Research, 8, 1-12.
10. Pagell, M., Shevchenko, A., 2014. Why Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Management Should Have No Future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44-55.
11. Rahbek Pedersen, E., 2009. The Many and the Few: Rounding Up the Smes That Manage Csr in the Supply Chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 109-116.
12. Ciliberti, F., Pontrandolfo, P., Scozzi, B., 2011. Small Business Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: A Literature Review. Ethics in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Global Commentary, 291-311.
13. Zorzini, M., Hendry, L.C., Huq, F.A., Stevenson, M., 2015. Socially Responsible Sourcing: Reviewing the Literature and its Use of Theory. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 35(1), 60-109.
14. Seuring, S., 2013. A Review of Modeling Approaches for Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Decision Support Systems, 54(4), 1513-1520.
15. Gimenez, C., Tachizawa, E.M., 2012. Extending Sustainability to Suppliers: A Systematic Literature Review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
16. Desore, A., Narula, S.A., 2018. An Overview on Corporate Response Towards Sustainability İssues in Textile İndustry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20, 1439-1459.
17. Göçmen, E., Derse, O., 2018. Forecasting of Electricity Generation Shares by Fossil Fuels using Artificial Neural Network and Regression Analysis in Turkey. International Scientific and Vocational Studies Journal, 2(2), 20-30.
18. Swee, S.K., Sev, V.N., Amer, Y., 2010. Challenges in Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Within a Collaborative Manufacturing Network. In 2010 8th International Conference On Supply Chain Management and Information, 1-8.
19. Govindan, K., Kaliyan, M., Kannan, D., Haq, A.N., 2014. Barriers Analysis for Green Supply Chain Management Implementation in Indian İndustries using Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 555-568.
20. Raian, S., Ali, S.M., Sarker, M.R., Sankaranarayanan, B., Kabir, G., Paul, S.K., Chakrabortty, R.K., 2022. Assessing Sustainability Risks in the Supply Chain of the Textile Industry Under Uncertainty. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177, 105975.
21. Köksal, D., Strähle, J., Müller, M., Freise, M. 2017. Social Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Textile and Apparel Industry-A Literature Review. Sustainability, 9(1), 100.
22. Aytekin, A., Okoth, B.O., Korucuk, S., Karamaşa, Ç., Tirkolaee, E.B., 2023. A Neutrosophic Approach to Evaluate the Factors Affecting Performance and Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Application to Textile Industry. Management Decision, 61(2), 506-529.
23. Shahi, S.K., Shiva, A., Dia, M., 2021. Integrated Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance in the. Indian Textile Industry. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: an International Journal, 16(3/4), 614-635.
24. Warasthe, R., Brandenburg, M., Seuring, S., 2022. Sustainability, Risk and Performance in Textile and Apparel Supply Chains. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 100069.
25. Aljoghaiman, A., Saad, M. Kumar, V., 2020. Investigating the Motivators, Barriers and Enablers Associated With the Implementation of Sustainable Supply Chain in Saudi Manufacturing Industry. 3rd Ieom European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.
26. Sebastianelli, R., Tamimi, N., 2020. Antecedents of Sustainable Supply Chain Initiatives: Empirical Evidence From The S&P 500. Business and Society Review, 125(1), 3-22.
27. Govindan, K., Rajeev, A., Padhi, S., Pati, R., 2020. Supply Chain Sustainability and Performance of Firms: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 137, 101923.
28. Yadav, G., Luthra, S., Jakhar, S., Mangla, S. Rai, D., 2020. A Framework to Overcome Sustainable Supply Chain Challenges Through Solution Measures of Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy: An Automotive Case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 1.
29. Geyi, D., Yusuf, Y., Menhat, M., Abubakar, T., Ogbuke, N., 2020. Agile Capabilities As Necessary Conditions for Maximising Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107501.
30. Muthu, S.S., 2017. Evaluation of Sustainability in Textile Industry. Sustainability in the Textile Industry, 9-15.
31. Pattnaik, P., Dangayach, G.S., Bhardwaj, A.K., 2018. A Review on the Sustainability of Textile Industries Wastewater with and Without Treatment Methodologies. Reviews on Environmental Health, 33(2), 163-203.
32. Lombardi Netto, A., Salomon, V.A., Ortiz‐Barrios, M.A., Florek‐Paszkowska, A.K., Petrillo, A., De Oliveira, O.J., 2021. Multiple Criteria Assessment of Sustainability Programs in the Textile Industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, 28(3), 1550-1572.
33. Oelze, N., 2017. Sustainable Supply Chain Management Implementation-Enablers and Barriers in the Textile Industry. Sustainability, 9(8), 1435.
34. Ullman, J.B., Bentler, P.M., 2012. Structural Equation Modeling. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition, 2.
35. Raza, M.H., Abid, M., Yan, T., Naqvi, S.A.A., Akhtar, S., Faisal, M., 2019. Understanding Farmers’ İntentions to Adopt Sustainable Crop Residue Management Practices: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227.
36. Jöreskog, K.G., Wold, H.O., 1982. Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction, North-Holland. Elsevier Science Publishers., 139.
37. Yılmaz, V., Çelik, H.E., Yağızer, C., 2009. Çevresel Duyarlılık ve Çevresel Davranışın Ekolojik Ürün Satın Alma Davranışına Etkilerinin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeliyle Araştırılması. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences/Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 1-13.
38. Beran, T.N., Violato, C., 2010. Structural Equation Modeling in Medical Research: A Primer. Bmc Research Notes, 3(1), 1-10.
39. Manavvi, S., Rajasekar, E., 2023. Assessing Thermal Comfort in Urban Squares in Humid Subtropical Climate: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Building and Environment, 229, 109931.
40. Li, J., Yang, L., Lv, R., Kuang, J., Zhou, K., Xu, M., 2023. Mediating Effect of Post-Stroke Depression Between Activities of Daily Living And Health-Related Quality of Life: Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling. Quality of Life Research, 32(2), 331-338.
41. Villalva A.J.E., 2023. Sustainability Assessment in the Steel Industry using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Model. World Development Sustainability, 2.
42. Maccallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., Hong, S., 1999. Sample Size in Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84.
43. Leidner, D.E., Carlsson, S., Elam, J., Corrales, M., 1999. Mexican and Swedish Managers' Perceptions of the Impact of EIS on Organizational Intelligence, Decision Making, and Structure. Decision Sciences, 30(3), 632-658.
44. Kline, R.B., 2023. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press, 494.
45. Tseng, M.L., Bui, T.D., Lim, M.K., Fujii, M., Mishra, U., 2022. Assessing Data-Driven Sustainable Supply Chain Management Indicators for the Textile Industry Under Industrial Disruption and Ambidexterity. International Journal of Production Economics, 245, 108401.
46. Rebs, T., Brandenburg, M., Seuring, S. 2019. System Dynamics Modeling for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review and Systems Thinking Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1265-1280.
47. Bui, T.D., Tsai, F.M., Tseng, M.L., Tan, R.R., Yu, K.D.S., Lim, M.K., 2021. Sustainable Supply Chain Management Towards Disruption and Organizational Ambidexterity: A Data Driven Analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 373-410.
48. Derse, O., 2022. Detection of Sustainable Logistics Sub-Components and, Determination of Impact Levels of Sustainable Logistics Components With Dematel Method. Toros University Feass Journal of Social Sciences, 9 (Special Issue), 18-25.
49. Bagozzi, R.P., Fornell, C., 1982. Theoretical Concepts, Measurement, and Meaning. C. Fornell (Ed.) A Second Generation of Mulivariate Analysis, Praeger, 2, 5-23.
50. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.