Differences in linguistic features of spontaneous speech: The Case of Obama's Speeches at the London, Toronto and Cannes G-20 Summit Press Conferences

Differences in linguistic features of spontaneous speech: The Case of Obama's Speeches at the London, Toronto and Cannes G-20 Summit Press Conferences

The research presented in this paper aimed to investigate the linguistic and discourse characteristics of Mr. Obama s press conferences held after the G-20 summits in London in 2009, in Toronto in 2010 and in Cannes in 2011. The President s speeches consist of two main sections: (1) the first section during which he spoke about his plans to deepen international connections and the second during which he answered the questions of journalists from different nationalities question/answer sessionconsidered as spontaneous speech text and labeled a TC, LC and CC. Using concordance software, the number of types and tokens and the type-token ratio were calculated. The results show that although the number of tokens decreases chronically, in terms of the qualitative analysis all speeches display similar characteristics regarding vocabulary variation.

___

  • Bailey, K. (2006). Issues in teaching speaking skills to adult ESOL learners. In John Comings, Barbara Garner, Cristine Smith (Eds.), Review of adult learning and literacy, Vol. 6: Connecting Research, Policy, And Practice: A Project of The National Center For The Study Of Adult Learning And Literacy. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The telling of a tale: Discourse structure and tense use. Learners' Narratives. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 3, 144-161.
  • Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. Schober, M. F. & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44 (2), 123 – 147.
  • Branigan, H.P., Lickley, R. & McKelvie, D. (2013). Non-linguistic influences on rates of disfluency in spontaneous speech. Retrieved July 5,2013, from http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/papers/99disfluency2.pdf.
  • Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dewaele, J. M., & Pavlenko, A. (2002). Emotion vocabulary in interlanguage. Language Learning, 52 (2), 263–322.
  • Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1995).Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Nunan, D. (1998). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Pu, M.M. (2006). Spoken and Written narratives: A comparative study. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing,16 (1), 37-61.
Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-9967
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Matbaası