İran'da eczacı iş gücünün dağılımındaki eşitlik
Amaç: Herkes için sağlık hizmeti sağlayabilmek amacıyla, tüm ülkelerdeki sağlık sistemleri insan kaynaklarının mekansal ve zamansal olarak eğitim ve uygun dağılımına ihtiyaç duyar. Bu çalışma, ülkedeki tıp üniversitelerine bağlı eczacıların dağılım eşitliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma için veriler İran İstatistik Merkezi ve 2014 İstatistik Yıllığı'ndan toplanmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasından sonra, eczacıların populasyona göre dağılımını incelemeye başladık. İran’ın tümünde 31 il ve üç tür tıp bilimi üniversitesi her ildeki insan sağlık kaynaklarının Gini ve Theil T endeksince dağılımından sorumludurlar. Theil T, İran illerindeki "iç" ve "ara" eşitsizlikleri açısından genel eşitsizliği gidermek ve sonuçları Excel ve STATA yazılımı ile gerçekleştirmek için kullanılmıştır.Bulgular: 16 ilin olumlu bir boşluğa sahip olduğunu ve 15 ilin olumsuz bir boşluğa sahip olduğunu ve illerin herhangi birinde eczacının karşılaştırılmasında populasyon payında denge olmadığını göstermektedir. Genel Gini katsayısı 0.71 ve Theil T eşitsizlik içinde % 47.2 olduğu ve eşitsizlik arasında % 52.8 genel eşitsizlik olduğu açıklandı. Tip 3 illerindeki Gini indeksi 0.5 olup ve tip 3 illerindeki bu indeks tip 1 ve 2'ye göre 0.6 ve 0.64 Gini indeksli olup daha iyi dağılım göstermektedir.Sonuç: Eczacılar ilaçların doğru kullanımı için rehberlik ve tavsiye sağlamada önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Eczacıların uygun dağılımı erişim ve sağlık hizmetlerinin topluma yaygınlaştırılmasında en önemli faktörlerden biridir. Ancak maalesef ülkede dengesiz bir coğrafi dağılım vardır ve hala yoksul bölgelerde önemli bir açık bulunmaktadır
Equality in distribution of pharmacist workforce in Iran
Purpose: To achieve health for everyone, health systems in all countries
need training and proper distribution of human resources in the spatial and
temporal places. This study aimed to evaluate the equality of the distribution
of pharmacists affiliated to medical universities in the country.Material and
Methods: The data for this study were collected
from the Statistical Center of Iran and Statistical Yearbook of 2014. After
collecting data we started to analyze the distribution of pharmacists according
to population. In entire Iran country, 31 provinces and in three types of
universities of medical sciences those are responsible for distribution of
health human resources in each province by Gini and Theil T indices. Results: Results show that, 16 provinces have a positive gap and 15
provinces have a negative gap and there is no balance in the share of the
population in compare of the pharmacist in any of the provinces. Overall Gini
coefficient was 0.71 and Theil T showed that within inequality explained 47.2%
and between inequality explained 52.8% overall inequality. The Gini index in
Type 3 provinces was 0.5 and they have better distribution than type 1 and type
2 provinces with 0.6 and .64 Gini index.
Conclusion: Pharmacists play an important role in providing guidance
and advice for the correct use of drugs. Appropriate distribution of
pharmacists is one of the most important factors in improving access and health
services throughout the society. But unfortunately there is an unbalanced
geographical distribution in the country and there still is a significant
deficit in the deprived areas.
___
- 1. World Health Organization Report. The World Health Report, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int. (accessed Dec 2003).
- 2. Wyss K. An approach to classifying human resources constraints to attaining health-related Millennium Development Goals. Human Resources for Health. 2004;2:8.
- 3. Anyangwe SC, Mtonga C. Inequities in the global health workforce: the greatest impediment to health in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2007;4:93-100.
- 4. Starfield B. The hidden inequity in health care. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10:15.
- 5. Mobaraki H, Hassani A, Kashkalani T, Khalilnejad R, Chimeh EE. Equality in distribution of human resources: the case of Iran’s Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42: 161-5.
- 6. Shahabi M, Tofighi S, Maleki M. The nurse and specialist physicians manpower distribution by population and its relationship with the number of beds at public hospitals in Iran’s 2001-2006. Journal of Health Administration. 2010;13:7-14.
- 7. Lin S-J. Access to community pharmacies by the elderly in Illinois: A geographic information systems analysis. J Med Syst. 2004;28:301-9.
- 8. Moalemi S, Barouni M, Meshkani Z, KazemiKaryani A, Kiayani AA. Equality in pharmacies distribution: case of Iran. American Journal of Pharmacy and Health Research. 2014;2:138-47.
- 9. Ceriani L, Verme P. The origins of the Gini index: extracts from Variabilità e Mutabilità (1912) by Corrado Gini. J Econ Inequal. 2012;10:421-43.
- 10. Jian J, Jianxiang W, Xiaoyi M, Yuding W, Renyong L. Equality of medical health resource allocation in China based on the Gini coefficient method. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44:445-57.
- 11. Kreng VB, Yang C-T. The equality of resource allocation in health care under the National Health Insurance System in Taiwan. Health Policy. 2011;100:203-10.
- 12. Chen R, Zhao Y, Du J, Wu T, Huang Y, Guo A. Health workforce equity in urban community health service of China. PloS One. 2014;9:e115988.
- 13. Goddard M, Gravelle H, Hole A, Marini G. Where did all the GPs go? Increasing supply and geographical equity in England and Scotland. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15:28-35.
- 14. Zandian H, Ghiasvand H, Nasimidust R. Measurement of inequality in the distribution of
health resources: a case study. Journal of Payesh. 2012;11:799-805.
- 15. HaghDoost A, Kamyabi A, ShrafiAsgarabad A, Sadeghirad B, Shafieian H, Ghasemi S. The geographical distribution of the medical groups in country and the disparities. Journal of Medical Council of Islamic Republic of Iran. 2010;28:411-9.
- 16. Horev T, Pesis-Katz I, Mukamel DB. Trends in geographic disparities in allocation of health care resources in the US. Health Policy. 2004;68:223-32.
- 17. Matsumoto M, Inoue K, Bowman R, Noguchi S, Toyokawa S, Kajii E. Geographical distributions of physicians in Japan and US: impact of healthcare system on physician dispersal pattern. Health Policy. 2010;96:255-61.
- 18. Fernandes BD, Lírio AF, de Freitas RR, Melchiors AC. Use of spatial analysis to assess geographic accessibility of community pharmacies in São Mateus. Pharmacol Pharm. 2013;4:438-42.
- 19. Nishiura H, Barua S, Lawpoolsri S, Kittitrakul C, Leman MM, Maha MS et al. Health inequalities in Thailand: geographic distribution of medical supplies in the provinces. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004;35:735-40.
- 20. Alkan BB, Atakan C, Şahin A. Measuring inequalities in the distribution of health workers by bi-plot approach: the case of Turkey. Journal of Economics
and Behavioral Studies 2011;2:57-66.
- 21. Oliveira MD, Bevan G. Measuring geographic inequities in the Portuguese health care system: an estimation of hospital care needs. Health Policy. 2003;66:277-93.
- 22. Todd A, Copeland A, Husband A, Kasim A, Bambra C. The positive pharmacy care law: an area-level analysis of the relationship between community pharmacy distribution, urbanity and social deprivation in England. BMJ open. 2014;4:e005764.
- 23. Ward K, Sanders D, Leng H, Pollock AM. Assessing equity in the geographical distribution of community pharmacies in South Africa in preparation for a national health insurance scheme. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92:482-9.
- 24. Toyabe S. Trend in geographic distribution of physicians in Japan. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8:1-8.
- 25. Nigenda G, Machado MH. From state to market: the Nicaraguan labour market for health personnel. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15:312-18.
- 26. Chomitz KM. What do Doctors Want?: Developing Incentives for Doctors to serve in Indonesia's Rural and Remote Areas. Washington DC,World Bank Publications, 1998.
- 27. Isabel C, Paula V. Geographic distribution of physicians in Portugal. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11:383-93.