Böbrek Taşı Olgularında Tam Tüpsüz Perkütan Nefrolitotomi Uygulaması

Amaç: Bu çalışmada tam tüpsüz perkutan nefrolitotomi (PNL) uygulamasıyla ilgili deneyimlerimiz aktarılmıştır. Materyal-Metod: Ocak 2010-Aralık 2012 tarihleri arasında böbrek taşı olan 140 olguda uygulanan tam tüpsüz PNL yönteminin sonuçları incelendi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 47,84(5-73) idi. Ortalama operasyon süresi 88.8(45-110) dk, taş alanı ise 375.2(110-175) mm² idi. Taşsızlığa ulaşma oranımız KÖRF dahil 130(%92.8) olarak hesaplandı. PNL uyguladığımız hastalarımızdan 1 tanesinde serozal kolon yaralanması 2 hastada postoperatif perirenal hematom izlendi. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak uygun vakalarda tam tüpsüz PNL, günümüzde böbrek taşı tedavisinde taşsızlığa ulaşma noktasında standart PNL kadar güvenle uygulanabileceğini düşünmekteyiz.

Practice of Totally Tubeless Nephrolitotomy among Patients with Renal Calculus

Purpose: We aimed to present the data on totally tubeless nephrolitotomy (PNL) outcomes undergone in our clinic. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 140 patients undergone totally tubeless PNL in our clinic between January 2010 and December 2012. Results: Mean patient age was 47,84 (5-73). Mean operative time was 88,8 (45-110) minutes where mean stone area was 375,3 (110-175) mm2 . 92,8% was our stone free rate. Remaining 10 patients had undergone ureterorenoscopy for ureteral stones. Two patients having non-opaque stones had residual kidney stones and treated by SWL. 8 patients (%5,7) needed blood transfusion, 2 patients needed perirenal hematoma and treated conservatively. No patients needed additional treatment or encountered vascular complications. One patient encountered serozal colon injury and treated conservatively. Conclusion: With regard to patient comfort, shorter hospital stay, low analgesic requirement, totally tubeless PNL gained popularity. We believe totally tubeless PNL may be used in suitable cases. Key Words: Kidney Stone, Totally Tubeless, Nephrolithotomy

___

  • Bdesha AS, Jones CR, North EA, et al. Routine placement of a nephrostomy tube is not necessary after percutaneous nephrostholithotomy. Br J Urol. 1997; 79: 1.
  • Marcovich R, Jacobson Al, Singh J, Shah D, ElHakim A, Lee BR, Smith Ad: No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.J Endourol. 2004;18:743-7
  • Pietrow PK, Auge BK Lallas CD, Santa-Cruz RW, Newman GE, Albala DM, Preminger GM. Pain after percütaneous nephrolithotomy;impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol. 2003; 17:411-4.
  • Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Bansal M: Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Large-bo-re or pigtail catheter? J Endourol. 2000; 14: 735Liatsikos EN, Hom D, Dinlenc CZ, et al: Tail stent ver-sus re-entry tube: A randomized comparison after percu-taneous stone extraction. Urology. 2002; 59: 15Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, et al. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 1997; 157:1578.
  • Goh M,Wolf JR JS.Almost totally tubeless percütaneous nephrolithotomy;further evolutionof the technique. J Endourol. 1999; 13:177-80.
  • Yang RM, Bellman GC: Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery in obese patients. Urology. 2004; 63: 1036
  • Jou YC, Cheng MC, Lin CT, Chen PC, Shen JH. Nephrostomy tube-free percutaneous nephrolitotomy for patients with large stones and staghorn stones. Urology. 2006; 67:30-4
  • Falahatkar S, Khosropanah I, Roshani A, Neiroomand H, Nikpar S, Nadjafi-Semnani M et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolitotomy for staghorn stones. J Endourol. 2008; 22:1447-51.
  • Aghamir SM, Hosseini SR, Gooran S. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2004; 18:647-62
  • Karami H, Gholamrezaie HR. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol. 2004; 18:475-6.
  • Karami H, Jabbari M, Arbab AH. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolitotomy: 5 years of experience in 201 patients. J Endourol. 2007; 21:169-72.
  • Shah HN, Kausik VB, et al: Safety and efficacy of bila-teral simultaneous tubeless percutaneous nephrolithoto-my. Urology. 2005; 66: 500-4.
  • Yazışma Adresi / Address for Correspondence: Dr. Nevzat Can Şener Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıd Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniğiı ANKARA e-mail: cansener@gmail.com geliş tarihi/received :06.03.2013 kabul tarihi/accepted:10.04.2013
Cukurova Medical Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2602-3032
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1976
  • Yayıncı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi