___

• Allen, I. E. & Seman, J. (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extend of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Nedham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
• Allen, I. E. & Seman, J. (2008). Online notion: Five years of growth in online learning. Nedham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
• Aroyo, L., De Bra, P., Houben, G., & Vdovjak, R. (2004). Embedding information retrieval in adaptive hypermedia: IR meets AHA New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 10(1), 53-76.
• Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 344-370.
• Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. A., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45-72.
• Berge, Z. L. (2002). Active, interactive, and reflective eLearning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 181-190.
• Bajraktarevic, N., Hall, W., & Fullick, P. (2003). Incorporating learning styles in hypermedia environment: Empirical evaluation. Paper presented at the Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems Workshop, Budapest, Hungary.
• Brusilovsky, P. (1998). Adaptive educational systems on the World-Wide-Web: A Review of available technologies. Paper presented at the International Conference in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, San Antonio, TX.
• Brusilovsky, P. (1999). Adaptive and intelligent technologies for Web-based education. Künstliche Intelligenz, 4, 19-25.
• Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(1/2), 87-110.
• Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: The role of student knowledge level and the case for meta-adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 487-497.
• Brusilovsky, P., Sosnovsky, S., & Shcherbinina, O. (2004). QuizGuide: Increasing the educational value of individualized self-assessment quizzes with adaptive navigation support. Proceeding of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corp., Govt., Health., & Higher Ed., 2004(1), 1806-1813.
• Chen, S. Y. & Paul, R. J. (2003). Editorial: Individual differences in web-based instruction-an overview. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 385-392.
• Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concept, strategies, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
• Danielson, R. L. (1997, June). Work in progress: Learning styles, media preferences, and adaptive education. Paper presented at the Adaptive Systems and User Modeling on the World Wide Web Workshop, Chia Laguna, Sardinia.
• De Bra, P. (2000). Pros and cons of adaptive hypermedia in Web-based education. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(1), 71-77.
• De Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P., & Houben, G. (1999). Adaptive hypermedia: From system to framework. ACM Computing Survey, 31(4).
• Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2002), How Do Online Students Differ From Lecture Students? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1).
• Far, B. H. & Hashimoto, A. H. (2000). A Computational model for learner's motivation states in individualized tutoring system. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Assisted Instruction, Taipei, Taiwan.
• Ford, N. & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281-311.
• Ford, N. & Chen, S. Y. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 5-22.
• Gauss, B. & Urbas, L. (2003). Individual differences in navigation between sharable content objects-an evaluation study of a learning module prototype. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 499-509.
• Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A., Papanikolaou, K., & Grigoriadou, M. (2004). Designing an adaptive feedback scheme to support reflection in concept mapping. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Adaptive Hypermedia 2004 Workshop, The Nederlands.
• Graff, M. (2003). Learning from Web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 407-418.
• Gunawardena, C.N. & McIsaac, M. S. (2003). Distance education. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd Edition. (pp. 113-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., & Land, S. M. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implications. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-97.
• Hill, J. R. & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(3), 37-52.
• Inan, F. A. & Grant, M. M. (2004). Applications of adaptive technologies in online learning. Proceeding of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corp., Govt., Health., & Higher Ed., 2004(1), 2701-2706.
• Inan, F. A. & Grant, M. M (2006, October). Adaptive Web Based Learning Environment (A- WBLE): Synthesis of Empirical Evaluations and Conditions for Successful Adaptive Web Based System Implementation. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Dallas, TX.
• Inan, F. A. & Grant, M.M. (2008). Individualized web-based instructional design. In Kidd, T. T., & Song, H. (Eds). Handbook of Research on Instructional Systems and Technology. Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
• Inan, F. A. & Lowther, D. L. (2007). Comparative analysis of computer-supported learning models and guidelines. In H. F. M. Neto & F. V. Brasileiro (Eds.), Advances in computer- supported learning. Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
• Inan, F. A. Yildirim, S., & Kiraz, E. (2004). A design and development of an online learning support system (OLSS) for preservice teachers: A discussion of attitudes and utilization. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 17(4), 1-15.
• Khan, B. H. (1997). Web-based instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Kelly, D. & Tangney, B. (2004). Evaluating presentation strategy and choice in an adaptive multiple intelligence based tutoring system. Paper presented at the Adaptive Hypermedia 2004 Workshop, The Nederlands.
• McGrath, B. (1998). Partners in learning: twelve ways technology changes the teacher-student relationship. T.H.E. Journal, 25(9), 58-61.
• Mitchell, T., Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. (2004). Adapting hypermedia to cognitive styles: Is it necessary? Paper presented at the Adaptive Hypermedia 2004 Workshop, The Nederlands.
• Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
• Muir, D. J. (2001). Adapting online education to different learning styles. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Chicago, IL.
• O'Brien, B. & Renner, A.L. (2002). Online Student Retention: Can It Be Done? World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2002(1), 1479-1483.
• Papanikolaou, K. A. & Grigoriadou, M. (2004). Accomodating learning style characteristics in adaptive educational hypermedia systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Adaptive Hypermedia 2004 Workshop, The Nederlands.
• Papanikolaou, K. A., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis, H., & Magoulas, G. D. (2003). Personalizing the interaction in a Web-based educational hypermedia system: The case of INSPIRE. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13(3), 213-267.
• Park, O. & Lee, J. (2003). Adaptive instructional system. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 403-437). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
• Parker, A. (1995). Distance education attrition. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 389-406.
• Picciano, A. G. (2001). Distance learning: Making connections across virtual space and time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Reategui, E., Boff, E., & Campbell, J. A. (2008). Personalization in an interactive learning environment through a virtual character. Computers & Education 51, 530-544.
• Saba, F. (2002). Student attritions: How to keep your online learner focused. Distance Education Report, 14(4), 1-2.
• Sabry, K. & Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443-454.
• Schrum, L. & Benson, A. (2001). Establishing successful online distance learning environment: Distinguishing factors that contribute to online courses and programs. In R. Discenza, C. Howard & K. Schenk (Eds.), The design and management of effective distance learning programs. Hershey Pa.: Idea Group Publishing.
• Setzer, J. C. & Lewis, L. (2005). Distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2002–03 (NCES 2005–010). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
• Sikora, A. C. & Carroll, C. D. (2003). A profile of participation in distance education: 1999-2000 (No. NCES 2003-154). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
• Song, L., Singleton, S. E., Hill, J. R. & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70.
• Terry, N. (2001). Assessing enrollment and attrition rates for the online MBA. T.H.E. Journal, 28(7), 64-68.
• Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., & Demetriadis, S. (2003). The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers & Education, 41(1), 87- 103.
• Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., Demetriadis, S., & Georgiadou, E. (2004). The value of adaptivity based on cognitive style: an empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 95-106.
• Vergidis, D. & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2002). Student dropout at the Hellenic Open University: Evaluation of the graduate program, “Studies in Education”. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(2).
• Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77–90.
• Xenos, M., Pierrakeas, C., & Pintelas, P. (2002). A survey on student dropout rates and dropout causes concerning the students in the course of informatics of the Hellenic Open University. Computers & Education, 39(4), 361-377.
• Yukselturk, E. & Inan, F. A. (2006). Examining the factors affecting student dropout in an online learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(2).
• Zheng, L. & Smaldino, S. (2003). Key instructional design elements for distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(2), 153-166.
• Correspondence: Fethi A. Inan, Assistant Professor, College of Education, Room #267, Box
• , Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, United States