Sosyal Dışlanmanın Etik Olmayan Tüketici Davranışı Gösterme Eğilimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Deneysel Bir Çalışma

Etik olmayan bir tüketici davranışını kendi başına gerçekleştirmek, onu bir grupla yakınlık kurmak için gerçekleştirmekten farklıdır. Dolayısıyla, sosyal dışlanmanın etik olmayan tüketici davranışı üzerindeki etkisi farklı durumlara göre değişiklik gösterebilir. Buradan yola çıkarak, bu çalışma etik olmayan bir tüketici davranışı meselesinde, bireylerin sosyal dışlanmaya karşı tepkilerini ölçmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, farklı katılımcılarla iki ayrı deneysel çalışma yapılmıştır. İlk çalışmada, bireylerin bireysel olarak etik olmayan tüketici davranışı gösterme eğilimleri ölçülmüştür. İkinci çalışmada, bireylerin bir grupla yakınlık kurmak için etik olmayan tüketici davranışı gösterme eğilimleri ölçülmüştür. Her iki deney de bir kontrol (dışlanmayan) ve bir deney grubu (dışlanan) ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sosyal dışlanma manipülasyonu Cyberball adındaki top atma oyunu ile verilmiştir. Etik olmayan tüketici davranışı “kullanılan bir ürünü kullanılmamış gibi iade etmek” davranışı üzerinden ölçülmüştür. Sonuçlar, dışlanan bireylerin (yalnızca erkeklerin) etik olmayan tüketici davranışını kendi başına gerçekleştirmek konusunda istekli olduklarını göstermiştir. Ancak dışlanan bireylerin bir grupla yakınlık kurmak için etik olmayan tüketici davranışı göstermek konusunda isteksiz oldukları tespit edilmiştir. 

The Effect of Social Exclusion on the Tendency to Engage in Unethical Consumer Behavior: An Experimental Study

Engaging in an unethical consumer behavior on one’s own is different from doing it for making a connection with a group. Thus, the effect of social exclusion on unethical consumer behavior may vary for different cases. Hence, the study aims to analyze the individuals’ responses to social exclusion in an unethical consumer issue with two experiments. The first experiment measures the excluded individuals’ willingness for engaging in unethical consumer behavior on their own. The second experiment analyzes the excluded individuals’ willingness for engaging in unethical consumer behavior for reconnection. Both studies include a control (non-excluded) and an experimental (excluded) group. A ball toss game called Cyberball manipulates social exclusion. Unethical consumer behavior is measured by “returning a used product as it is unused.” The results indicate that only excluded men tend to engage in unethical consumer behavior on their own. However, the results show that excluded individuals are less likely to engage in unethical consumer behavior for reconnection. 

___

  • Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How Low Can You Go? Ostracism by a Computer is Sufficient to Lower Self-Reported Levels of Belonging, Control, Self-Esteem, and Meaningful of Existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 560-567
  • Xu, M., Li, Z., Zhang, J., Sun, L., Fan, L., Zeng, Q., & Yang, D. (2015). Social Exclusion Influences Attentional Bias to Social Information. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 199-208.
  • Williams, K. D., & Zadro, L. (2001). On Being Ignored, Excluded, and Rejected. M. R. Leary (ed.), Interpersonal Rejection, 21-54.
  • Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social Ostracism by Coworkers: Does Rejection Lead to Loafing or Compensation?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 693-706.
  • Williams, K. D., & Nida, S. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and Coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 71-75.
  • Williams, K. D., & Jarvis, B. (2006). Cyberball: A Program for Use in Research on Interpersonal Ostracism and Acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 174- 180.
  • Williams, K. D., Govan, C. L., Croker, V., Tynan, D., Cruickshank, M., & Lam, A. (2002). Investigations into Differences between Social-and Cyberostracism. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 65.
  • Williams, K. D., & Fitness, J. (2004). Social and Physical Pain: Similarities and Differences. Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Ft. Worth, TX.
  • Williams, K. D., & Carter-Sowell, A.R. (2007). Ostracism. Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, Roy F. Baumeister, & Kathleen D. Vohs (ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 641-43.
  • Williams, K. D., Bernieri, F. J., Faulkner, S. L., Gada-Jain, N., & Grahe, J. E. (2000). The Scarlet Letter Study: Five Days of Social Ostracism. Journal of Personal & Interpersonal Loss, 5(1), 19-63.
  • Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Psychology, 58(1), 425-452.
  • Warburton, W. A., Williams, K. D., & Cairns, D. R. (2006). When Ostracism Leads to Aggression: The Moderating Effects of Control Deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 213-220.
  • Williams, K. D. (1997). Social Ostracism. Aversive Interpersonal Behavior. Springer US., 133-170.
  • Wan, E. W., Xu, J., & Ding, Y. (2014). To be or not to be Unique? The Effect of Social Exclusion on Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1109-1122.
  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (1992). Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(8), 585-597.
  • Twenge, J. M., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Social Exclusion Causes Self-Defeating Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 606-615.
  • Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If You Can't Join Them, Beat Them: Effects of Social Exclusion on Aggressive Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1058-1069.
  • Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Dewall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social Exclusion Decreases Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 56-66.
  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A PersonSituation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601-617.
  • Trepte, S. (2006). Social Identity Theory. Psychology of Entertainment, J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (ed.), 255-271.
  • Tajfel, H. (1979). Individuals and Groups in Social Psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 183-190.
  • Street, M. D., Douglas, S. C., Geiger, S. W., & Martinko, M. J. (2001). The Impact of Cognitive Expenditure on the Ethical Decision-Making Process: The Cognitive Elaboration Model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 256-277.
  • Smith, A., & Williams, K. D. (2004). RU There? Ostracism by Cell Phone Text Messages. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8(4), 291301
  • Runes, D. D. (1964). Dictionary of Philosophy. Littlefields, Adams and Co., Patterson.
  • Ruegger, D., & King, E. W. (1992). A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender upon Student Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(3), 179-186.
  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger Publishers.
  • Pillutla, M. M., & Thau, S. (2009). Actual and Potential Exclusion as Determinants of Individuals’ Unethical Behavior in groups. Psychological Perspectives on Ethical Behavior and Decision Making, David De Cremer (ed.), 121-133.
  • Pickett, C. L., Gardner, W. L., & Knowles, M. (2004). Getting a cue: The Need to Belong and Enhanced Sensitivity to Social Cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1095-1107.
  • Nezlek, J. B., Kowalski, R. M., Leary, M. R., Blevins, T., & Holgate, S. (1997). Personality Moderators of Reactions to Interpersonal Rejection: Depression and Trait Self-Esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1235-1244.
  • Naderi, I. (2013). Social Exclusion and Green Consumption (Doctoral Thesis, North Texas University).
  • Morwitz, V. G., Johnson, E., & Schmittlein, D. (1993). Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior?. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 46-61.
  • Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. L. (2009). Motivations for Prevention or Promotion Following Social Exclusion: Being Rejected Versus Being Ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 415.
  • Mitchell, V. W., Balabanis, G., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Cornwell, T. B. (2009). Measuring Unethical Consumer Behavior across Four Countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 395-412.
  • Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Social Exclusion Causes People to Spend and Consume Strategically in the Service of Affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 902-919.
  • Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does Social Exclusion Motivate Interpersonal Reconnection? Resolving the “Porcupine Problem.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42-55.
  • Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does Social Exclusion Motivate Interpersonal Reconnection? Resolving the “Porcupine Problem.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42-55.
  • Macdonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does Social Exclusion Hurt? The Relationship Between Social and Physical Pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202-223.
  • Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous Consumption Versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 530-544.
  • Leary, M. R. (1990). Responses to Social Exclusion: Social Anxiety, Jealousy, Loneliness, Depression, and Low Self-Esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 221-229.
  • Lakin, J. L., Chartrand, T. L., & Arkin, R. M. (2008). I am too just like You Nonconscious Mimicry as an Automatic Behavioral Response to Social Exclusion. Psychological Science, 19(8), 816-822.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages in the Development of Moral Thought and Action. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
  • Knowles, M. L., & Gardner W. L. (2007). Rejection. Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, Roy F. Baumeister & Kathleen D. Vohs (ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 738-740.
  • Khazanchi, D. (1995). Unethical Behavior in Information Systems: The Gender Factor. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 741-749.
  • Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and Responsibility. Yale University Press.
  • Kavak, B., Gürel, E., Eryiğit, C., & Tektaş, Ö. Ö. (2009). Examining the Effects of Moral Development Level, Self-Concept, and Self-Monitoring on Consumers’ Ethical Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 115-135.
  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366395.
  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5-16.
  • Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255-269.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.
  • Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2000). Social Exclusion and Selective memory: How the Need to Belong Influences Memory for Social Events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 486-496.
  • Fullerton, S., Kerch, K. B., & Dodge, H. R. (1996). Consumer Ethics: An Assessment of Individual Behavior in the Market Place. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(7), 805- 814.
  • Fishbein, M. (1979). A Theory of Reasoned Action: Some Applications and Implications. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, 65-116
  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87-96.
  • Evans, R. L. (1971). Richard Evans' Quote Book. Publishers Press.
  • Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290-292.
  • Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). Why Rejection Hurts: A Common Neural Alarm System for Physical and Social Pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 294-300.
  • Dubinsky, A. J., & Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19(2), 83-107.
  • Dickerson, S. S., Gruenewald, T. L., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). When the Social Self is Threatened: Shame, Physiology, and Health. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1191- 1216.
  • Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute Stressors and Cortisol Responses: A Theoretical Integration and Synthesis of Laboratory Research. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 355–391
  • Dewall, C. N., & Richman, S. B. (2011). Social Exclusion and the Desire to Reconnect. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 919-932.
  • Dewall, C. N., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Alone but Feeling No Pain: Effects of Social Exclusion on Physical Pain Tolerance and Pain Threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 1-15.
  • Chow, R. M., Tiedens, L. Z., & Govan, C. L. (2008). Excluded Emotions: The Role of Anger in Antisocial Responses to Ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 896-903.
  • Caza, A., Barker, B. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2004). Ethics and Ethos: The Buffering and Amplifying Effects of Ethical Behavior and Virtuousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(2), 169-178.
  • Buss, D. M. (1990). The Evolution of Anxiety and Social Exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 196-201.
  • Burchardt, T., J. Le Grand, and D. Piachaud (1999). Social Exclusion in Britain 1991-1995, Social Policy and Administration, 33(3), 227-244.
  • Bourgeois, K. S., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Coping with Rejection: Derogating Those Who Choose Us Last. Motivation and Emotion, 25(2), 101-111
  • Beu, D., & Buckley, M. R. (2001). The Hypothesized Relationship Between Accountability and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(1), 57-73.
  • Betz, M., O'Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321324.
  • Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121-134.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of Social Exclusion on Cognitive Processes: Anticipated Aloneness Reduces Intelligent Thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 817-827.
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1990). Point-Counterpoints: Anxiety and Social Exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 165-195.
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
  • Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social Exclusion Impairs Self-Regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 589-604.
  • Barry, V. (1979). Moral Issues in Business, Wadsworth Publishing: New York.
  • Ayduk, Ö., Gyurak, A., & Luerssen, A. (2008). Individual Differences in the Rejection– Aggression Link in the Hot Sauce Paradigm: The Case of Rejection Sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 775-782.
  • Ajzen, I., Brown, T. C., & Carvajal, F. (2004). Explaining the Discrepancy between Intentions and Actions: The case of Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1108-1121.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1308-5549
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Finansal Okuryazarlık ve Tasarruf Davranışları: Kamu Çalışanları Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Metehan ŞAHİN, Serap BARIŞ

The Relationship Between Current Account Balance and Types of Credits: An Application on Selected OECD Countries

Nihat IŞIK, Suat Serhat YILMAZ, Efe Can KILINÇ

Rekabet ve Etkinlik: Avrupa Birliği Bankacılık Endüstrisi Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Ramazan EKİNCİ, Recep KÖK

16 Nisan 2017 Halk Oylaması ve Halk Oylaması Sürecinin Siyaset Bilimi Ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü Öğrencileri Tarafından Algılanmasına İlişkin Bir Araştırma: Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Örneği

Gürbüz ÖZDEMİR

Sosyal Dışlanmanın Etik Olmayan Tüketici Davranışı Gösterme Eğilimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Deneysel Bir Çalışma

Niray TUNÇEL, Bahtışen KAVAK

Türkiye’de Beşeri Sermaye ve Fiziksel Sermaye Arasındaki İkame Olanakları: Translog Üretim Fonksiyonu Yaklaşımı

Mehmet SONGUR

Yükselen Piyasa Ekonomilerinde Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar ve İhracat İlişkisi: Panel Veri Eşbütünleşme Analizleri (1996-2014)

Mustafa Kemal DEĞER, Muharrem Akın DOĞANAY

Orta Gelir Tuzağından Çıkış İçin Yeni Bir Strateji: Küresel Keynesyencilik

Yaşar Tamer ERGÜL

Menkul Kıymet Borsası ile Reel Sektör İlişkisi: Güncel Bir Yaklaşımla Panel Veri Analizi

Müslüm POLAT, Feyzi YAŞAR

Restoran İşletmelerinde Hizmet Kalitesinin Müşteri Memnuniyetine ve Sadakatine Etkisi: Oba Restoran Örneği

Yusuf BİLGİN, Önder KETHÜDA