Rekabet ve Etkinlik: Avrupa Birliği Bankacılık Endüstrisi Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı “rekabet–etkinlik” hipotezini test etmektir. Avrupa Birliği (AB) bankacılık sisteminde krizlere karşı direncin arttırılmasına yönelik kararların, rekabet ve maliyet etkinliğini artırdığı bilinmektedir. Rekabet-Etkinlik hipotezine göre finansal piyasalarda ortaya çıkan rekabet etkinlik artışına, dolayısıyla maliyetlerin de düşmesine neden olmaktadır. Analize konu olan örneklem 26 AB ülkesidir, 2006-2014 dönemini kapsamaktadır. Çalışmada Panel Stokastik Sınır Analizinden yararlanılarak maliyet etkinlik skorları hesaplandığında; özellikle 2010 yılı sonrası borç krizinin ardından maliyet etkinliğinin düştüğü görülmektedir. Ayrıca Lerner indeksi yöntemiyle rekabet gücü ölçüldüğünde; AB bankacılık sisteminde rekabet gücünün arttığı anlaşılmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı bağlamıyla rekabet ve etkinlik arasındaki Granger nedensellik incelendiğinde; rekabetten etkinliğe pozitif bir nedensellik mevcut iken; etkinlikten rekabete bir nedensellik olmadığı görülmektedir. Bu sonuçlara göre Avrupa Birliği bankacılık sistemi açısından ‘Quiet Life’ (rahat yaşam) hipotezi doğrulanmamaktadır.

Competition and Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis on the Banking Industry of the European Union

The principal aim of this study is to test the hypothesis of “competition-efficiency”. It is known that the decisions on increasing strength against the crises in the banking system of the European Union (EU) increase competition and cost efficiency. According to the hypothesis of “competition-efficiency”, competition in financial markets causes increasing of efficiency and decreasing of costs. The sample in this study is 26 countries of the EU and in the period of 2006-2014. Cost efficiency scores are measured by using the Panel Stochastic Frontier Analysis, and it is seen that cost efficiency decreases within the debt crisis after 2010. Besides competitive advantage is measured with the method of Lerner index, and it is witnessed that the competitive advantage increases in the banking system of the EU. With regard to the aim of the study, Granger causality between competition and efficiency is examined, and there is a positive causality from competition to efficiency, but also there is not causality from efficiency to competition. According to these findings, the hypothesis of Quiet Life is not accepted for the banking system of the EU.                      

___

  • Zarutskie, R. (2013). Competition, financial innovation and commercial bank loan portfolios. Journal of Financial Intermediation http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jfi.2013.02.001
  • Yildirim, H. ve Philippatos, G.C. (2007). Efficiency of Banks: Recent Evidence from the Transition Economies of Europe, 1993-2000, The European Journal of Finance, 13 (2), 123-143.
  • Weill, L. (2013). Bank competition in the eu: How has it evolved? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 26:100–112.
  • Weill, L. (2009). Convergence in Banking Efficiency across European Countries, Working paper, LARGE, Universite Robert Schuman, Institut d’Etudes Politiques.
  • Weill, L. (2004). On the Relationship between Competition and Efficiency in the EU Banking Sector. Credit and Capital, 37, 3, 329-352.
  • Sun, L. ve Change, T.P. (2011). A Comprehensive Analysis of the Effects of Risk Measures on Bank Efficiency, Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 17271735.
  • Schaeck, K. ve Čihák, M. (2008). How Does Competition Affect Efficiency and Soundness in Banking? New Empirical Evidence. ECB Working Papers Series, No. 932, September.
  • Pruteanu-Podpiera, A., Weill, L. ve Schobert, F. (2008). Banking Competition and Efficiency: a Micro-Data Analysis on the Czech Banking Industry. Comparative Economic Studies, 50, 253-273.
  • Pasiouras, F., Tanna, S. ve Zopounidis, C. (2009). The impact of banking regulations, on banks’ cost and profit efficiency: Cross-country evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 18, 294–302.
  • Panzar, J. C. ve Rosse, J.N. (1987). Testing for monopoly equilibrium. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 443–456.
  • Özcan, A. ve Çiftçi, C. (2015). Türkiye’de Mevduat Bankacılığında Yoğunlaşma ve Karlılık İlişkisi (2006-2013 Dönemi), Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8, 3, 1-12
  • Matousek, R. ve Taci, A. (2004). Efficiency in Banking: Empirical Evidence from the Czech Republic, Economics of Planning, 37, 225-244.
  • Maudos, J., Fernandez de Guevara, J. (2007). The Cost of Market Power in Banking: Social Welfare Loss vs. Cost Inefficiency. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 2103 -2125.
  • Maudos, J., Pastor, J.M. and Pérez, F. (2002). Competition and Efficiency in the Spanish Banking Sector: the Importance of Specialisation, Applied Financial Economics, 12, 505-516.
  • Maudos, J., Pastor, J. M., Perez, F. ve Quesada, J. (2002a). Cost and profit efficiency in European banks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 12, 33–58.
  • Mamatzakis, E., Staikouras, C. ve Koutsomanoli-Filippaki. A. (2008). Bank efficiency in the new European Union member states: Is There Convergence? International Review of Financial Analysis, 17, 1156-1172.
  • Lozano-Vivas, A. ve Pasiouras, F. (2010). The impact of non-traditional activities on the estimation of bank efficiency: International evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 1436–1449.
  • Lerner, A. P. (1934). The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power. The Review of Economic Studies, 1(3), 157–175.
  • Lensink, R., Meesters, A. ve Naaborg, I. (2008). Bank efficiency and foreign ownership: Do good institutions matter? Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 834–844.
  • Koetter, M., Kolari, J. W. ve Spierdijk, L. (2008). Efficient Competition? Testing the 'Quiet Life' of U.S. Banks with Adjusted Lerner Indices. Paper presented at the 44th Bank market structure conference, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
  • Kasman, A. (2001). The Profit-Structure Relationship in the Turkish Banking Industry Using Direct Measures of Efficiency, Ege Akademik Bakış, 1, 141-164
  • Kasman, A. ve Yildirim, C. (2006). Cost and profit efficiencies in transition banking: The case of new EU members. Applied Economics, 38, 1079– 1090.
  • Hasan, I. ve Morton, K. (2003), Development and efficiency of the banking sector in a transitional economy: Hungarian experience. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 2249-2271.
  • Günalp, B. ve Çelik, T. (2004). Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Piyasa Yapısı ve Performans İlişkilerinin Etkinlik İçin Doğrudan Bir Ölçüt Kullanılarak Test Edilmesi, Gazi Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 6 (3), 31-57
  • Goddard, J., Molyneux, P. ve Wilson, J.O.S. (2001). European Banking: Efficiency, Technology and Growth. John Wiley, Chichester
  • Fernandez de Guevara, J., Maudos, J. ve Perez, F. (2005). Market power in European banking sectors. Journal of Financial Services Research, 27 (2), 109–137.
  • Evanoff, D. ve Ors, E. (2002). Local market consolidation and bank productive efficiency. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper, 02-25.
  • Dietsch, M. ve Lozano-Vivas, A. (2000). How the environment determines banking efficiency: A comparison between French and Spanish industries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 985–1004.
  • Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry and public policy. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 1–9.
  • Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry and public policy. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 1–9.
  • Çelik, T., Kaplan, M. ve Şahin, F. (2015). Efficiency, Concentration and Competition in the Turkish Banking Sector, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 30(346), 81-104
  • Çelik, T. ve Kaplan, M. (2016). Testing the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm for the Turkish Banking Sector: 2008-2013, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1625-1631.
  • Çalmaşur, G. ve Daştan, H. (2016). Türk Bankacılık Endüstrisinde Piyasa Yapısı ve Karlılık İlişkisi, Ege Akademik Bakış, 16, 2, 363-378
  • Clerides, S., Delis, M. ve Kokas, S. (2013). A new data set on bank competition in national banking markets. Cyprus: University of Cyprus, Working Papers in Economics
  • Claessens, S. (2009). Competition in the financial sector: Overview of competition policies. World Bank Research Observer, 24(1), 83–118.
  • Claessens, S. ve Van Horen, N. (2012). Foreign banks: Trends, impact and financial stability. IMF working paper WP/12/10.
  • Claessens, S. ve Laeven, L. (2004). What drives bank competition? Some international evidence? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36, 562– 583.
  • Chen, X. (2007). Banking deregulation and credit risk: Evidence from the EU. Journal of Financial Stability, 2, 356–390.
  • Casu, B. ve Girardone, C. (2006). Bank Competition, Concentration and Efficiency in the Single European Market. The Manchester School, 74 (4), 441- 468.
  • Casu, B., Girardone, C. ve Molyneux, P. (2004). Productivity change in European banking: A comparison ofparametric and non-parametric approaches. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 2521–2540.
  • Carbo, S., Humphrey, D., Maudos, J. Ve Molyneux, P. (2009). Cross-country comparisons of competition and pricing power in European banking. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28, 115–134.
  • Boot, A.W. ve Schmeijts, A. (2006). The competitive challenge in banking. In L. Renneboog (Ed.), Advances in corporate finance and asset pricing (pp. 133–160). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Berger, A.N., Klapper, L.F. ve Turk Ariss, R. (2009). Bank competition and financial stability. J. Financ. Serv. Res, 35 (2), 99–118.
  • Berger, A. ve Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, 895–947.
  • Berger, A.N. ve Humphrey, D.B. (1997). Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175-212.
  • Beck, T., De Jonghe, O. ve Schepens, G. (2013). Bank competition and stability: cross-country heterogeneity. J. Financ. Intermediat, 22 (2), 218–244.
  • Battese, G. E. ve Coelli, T. J. (1995). A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332.
  • Battese, G. E. ve Coelli, T. J. (1992), Frontier Production Function, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-169.
  • Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Ayaydın, H. ve Karakaya, A. (2014). The Effect of Bank Capital on Profitability and Risk in Turkish Banking, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5, 252-271
  • Amel, D., Barnes, C., Panetta, F. ve Salleo, C. (2004). Consolidation and Efficiency in the Financial Sector: a Review of the International Evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 2493-2519.
  • Altunbas, Y., Carbo, S., Gardener, E.P.M. ve Molyneux, P. (2007). Examining the Relationships between Capital, Risk, and Efficiency in European Banking. European Financial Management, 13(1), 49-70.
  • Andries, A. M. ve Căpraru, B. (2014). The nexus between competition and efficiency: The European banking industries experience. International Business Review, 23, 566–579.
  • Andries, A. M. ve Căpraru, B. (2012a). Competition and efficiency in EU27 banking systems. Baltic Journal of Economics, 12(1), 41–60.
  • Allen, L. ve Rai, A. (1996). Operational Efficiency in Banking: An International Comparison. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 655-672.
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1308-5549
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Menkul Kıymet Borsası ile Reel Sektör İlişkisi: Güncel Bir Yaklaşımla Panel Veri Analizi

Müslüm POLAT, Feyzi YAŞAR

Restoran İşletmelerinde Hizmet Kalitesinin Müşteri Memnuniyetine ve Sadakatine Etkisi: Oba Restoran Örneği

Yusuf BİLGİN, Önder KETHÜDA

Finansal Okuryazarlık ve Tasarruf Davranışları: Kamu Çalışanları Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Metehan ŞAHİN, Serap BARIŞ

The Relationship Between Current Account Balance and Types of Credits: An Application on Selected OECD Countries

Nihat IŞIK, Suat Serhat YILMAZ, Efe Can KILINÇ

16 Nisan 2017 Halk Oylaması ve Halk Oylaması Sürecinin Siyaset Bilimi Ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü Öğrencileri Tarafından Algılanmasına İlişkin Bir Araştırma: Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Örneği

Gürbüz ÖZDEMİR

Orta Gelir Tuzağından Çıkış İçin Yeni Bir Strateji: Küresel Keynesyencilik

Yaşar Tamer ERGÜL

Sosyal Dışlanmanın Etik Olmayan Tüketici Davranışı Gösterme Eğilimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Deneysel Bir Çalışma

Niray TUNÇEL, Bahtışen KAVAK

Yükselen Piyasa Ekonomilerinde Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar ve İhracat İlişkisi: Panel Veri Eşbütünleşme Analizleri (1996-2014)

Mustafa Kemal DEĞER, Muharrem Akın DOĞANAY

Türkiye’de Beşeri Sermaye ve Fiziksel Sermaye Arasındaki İkame Olanakları: Translog Üretim Fonksiyonu Yaklaşımı

Mehmet SONGUR

Rekabet ve Etkinlik: Avrupa Birliği Bankacılık Endüstrisi Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Ramazan EKİNCİ, Recep KÖK