Mesleki Bağlılık ve Mesleki Öz-yeterlik Algısının Bilgi Paylaşma Davranışına Etkisi

Bu çalışmada, hekimlerin mesleki bağlılık ve mesleki öz-yeterlik algılarının bilgi paylaşma davranışlarına etkisi araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca, mesleki bağlılık ve mesleki öz-yeterlik düzeylerinin açık ve örtük bilgilerin paylaşılmasına etkisinin farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı da incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla, 251 dermatologdan elde edilen verilerle nicel bir araştırma yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre, hekimlerin mesleki bağlılık ve mesleki öz-yeterlilik algılarının bilgi paylaşma davranışlarını pozitif olarak etkilediği görülmüştür.Yine, hekimlerin mesleki bağlılık ve mesleki öz-yeterlik düzeylerinin açık bilgi paylaşma davranışlarını pozitif olarak etkilediği bulunmuştur. Örtük bilgilerin paylaşılmasında ise, mesleki bağlılığın pozitif etkisi bulunurken; mesleki öz-yeterlik algısının ise etkili olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

The Effects of Occupational Commitment and Occopational Self-Efficacy on Knowlegde Sharing Behaviours

In this study, it has been investigated the effects of occupational commitment and perceived occupational self-efficacy on knowledge sharing behaviours. In addition, the particular effects of occupational commitment and occupational self-efficacy on explicit and tacit knowledge sharing behaviours has also been separately examined. This investigation included the quantitative analysis of the data gathered from 251 dermatologists. According to the results of the analysis, dermatologist’ perceived occupational commitment and perceived occupational self-efficacy positively affects their knowledge sharing behaviours. Moreover, dermatologist’ perceived occupational commitment and perceived occupational self-efficacy, again, positively affects their explicit knowledge sharing behaviours. Lastly, whereas their perceived occupational commitment positively affects their tacit knowledge sharing behaviours, their perceived occupational selfefficacy does not affect their tacit knowledge sharing behaviours.

___

  • Akgül, A. ve Çevik, O. (2005). İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri SPSS'te İşletme Yönetimi Uygulamaları. 2. Baskı, Ankara: Emek Ofset Ltd. Şti.
  • Aktaş, H. ve Gürkan, Ç. G. (2015). İş-Aile ve Aile-İş Çatışması İle Bireysel Performans Etkileşiminde Mesleki Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü: Hemşireler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 16 (2), 139-154.
  • Ardichvili, A., Page, V. ve Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and Barriers to Participation in Virtual Knowledge-Sharing Communities of Practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7 (1), 64-77.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self- Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37 (2), 122-147.
  • Bartol, K. M. ve Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9 (1), 64-76.
  • Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Blau, G. ve Holladay, E. B. (2006). Testing the Discriminant Validity of a FourDimensional Occupational Commitment Measure. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, (4), 691-704.
  • Bock, G. W. ve Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes About Knowledge Sharing. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 15 (2), 14-21.
  • Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G. ve Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 87-111.
  • Can Baysal, A. ve Paksoy, M. (1999). Mesleğe ve Örgüte bağlılığın Çok Yönlü İncelenmesinde Meyer-Allen Modeli. İ.Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi,28 (1), 7-15.
  • Casimir, G., Lee, K. ve Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge Sharing: Influences of Trust, Commitment and Cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16, 740-753.
  • Chen, S.L., Chang, S.M., Lin, H.S. ve Chen, C. H. (2008). Post- Sars Knowledge Sharing and Professional Commitment in the Nursing Profession. Journal of Clinical Nurses, 18, 1738-1745.
  • Chen, C.J. ve Hung, S.W. (2010). To Give or To Receive? Factors Influencing Members' Knowledge Sharing and Community Promotion in Professional Virtual Communities. Information and Management, 47, 226-236.
  • Cohen, D. (1998). Towards a Knowledge Context: Report on the First Annual U.C. Berkeley Forum on Knowledge and the Firm. California Management Review, 40 (3), 22-39.
  • Constant, D., Kiesler, S. ve Sproull, L. (1994). What's Mine is Ours, or is It? A Study of Attitudes About Information Sharing. Information Systems Research, 5 (4), 400-421.
  • Cropanzano, R. ve Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31 (6), 874-900.
  • Chennamaneni, A. (2006). Determinants of Knowledge Sharing Behaviors: Developing and Testing an Integrated Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Teksas Üniversitesi. Theoretical Model.
  • Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in A Global Organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352-364.
  • Çetin, A. ve Şentürk, M. (2016). Bilgi Paylaşma Davranışının Planlı Davranış Teorisi ve Sosyal Değişim Teorisi Bağlamında İncelenmesi: Dermatologlar Üzerine Ampirik Bir Araştırma. Ege Akademik Bakış, 16(2) 241-256.
  • Çöl, G. (2004). Örgütsel Bağlılık Kavramı ve Benzer Kavramlarla İlişkisi. İş Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 6 (2).
  • Demirel, Y.ve Seçkin, Z. (2008). Bilgi ve Bigi Paylaşımının Yenilikçilik Üzerine Etkisi. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17 (1), 189-202.
  • Davenport, T. ve Prusak, L. (2000). İş Dünyasında Bilgi Yönetimi. (G. Günay, Çev.), İstanbul: Rota Yayınları.
  • Endres, M.L., Endres,, S. P., Chowdhury , S.K. ve Alam, I. (2007). Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Self-efficacy Theory, and Application to the Open Source Community. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11 (3), 92-103.
  • Fülleman, D., Jenny, G.J., Brauchil, R. , Bauer, G.F. (2015). The Key Role of Shared Participation in Changing Occupational Self- Efficacy Through Stress Management Courses. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 490-510.
  • George, D. ve Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.
  • Göksel, A., Aydıntan, B. ve Bingöl, D. (2011). Örgütlerde Bilgi Paylaşım Davranışı : Sosyal Sermaye Boyutundan Bir Bakış. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65 (4), 87-109.
  • Gurteen, D. (1999). Creating a Knowledge Sharing Culture. Knowledge Management Magazine, 2 (5), 1-4.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R. L. ve Black,W.C. (2000). Multivariate Data Analysis, Fifth Edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Hansen, M.T., (1999). The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
  • Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6 (2), 91-100.
  • Hislop, D. (2003). Linking Human Resource Management and Knowledge Management via Commitment: A Review and Research Agenda. Employee Relations, 25 (2), 182-202.
  • Husted, K. ve Michailova, S. (2002). Diagnosing and Fighting Knowledge- Sharing Hostility. Organizational Dynamics, 31 (1), 60-73.
  • Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H. ve Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The Relationship Between Trust, Self-efficacy, and Outcome Expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (2), 153-169.
  • Jayawardena, C. ve Gregar, A. (2013). Career and Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (ICICKM-2013), 533-539.
  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. ve Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 113-143.
  • Köseoğlu, M. A., S. Ocak ve G. Şimşek (2009). Bilgi Paylaşımını Etkileyen Faktörler Nelerdir?: Bir Kamu Hastanesi Örneği. Uluslararası VII. Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, Yalova Üniversitesi-İstanbul Üniversitesi, 598- 612.
  • Kwok, J. S. ve Gao, S. (2004). Knowledge Sharing Community in P2P Network: A Study of Motivational Perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 (1), 94-102.
  • Lachman, R. ve Aranya, N. (1986). Job Attitudes and Turnover Intentions among Professionals in Different Work settings. Organization Studies, 7 (3), 279-273.
  • Lakhani, K. ve von Hippel, E. (2003). How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance. Research Policy, 32 (6), 923-943.
  • Lee, K., Carswell, J. J. ve Allen, N. J. (2000). A Meta-Analytic Review of Occupational Commitment: Relation with Person and Work-Related Variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (1), 799-811.
  • Lin, C. P. (2007). To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, İts Mediators and Antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70 (4), 411-428.
  • Meyer, J., Allen, N. ve Smith, C. (1993). Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
  • Nesje, K. (2016). Personality and Professional Commitment of Students in Nursing, Social Work, and Teaching: A Comparative Survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 53, 173-181.
  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5 (1). 14-37.
  • Nonaka I. ve ve Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of 'Ba': Building a Foundationfor Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40 (3), 40-54.
  • Özdevecioğlu, M. ve Aktaş, A. (2007), "Kariyer Bağlılığı, Mesleki Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Bağlılığın Yaşam Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi: İş Aile Çatışmasının Rolü", Erciyes Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 28, 1-20.
  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P. ve Finkelstein, S. (1996). Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best. Harvard Business Review, 74 (2), 71-80.
  • Ryu, S., Ho, S. H.ve Han, I. (2003). Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Physicians in Hospitals. Expert Systems with Applications, 25 (1), 113-122.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1985). Participation on Goal Setting: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Skills of Learning Disabled Children. Journal of Special Education, 19, 307-317.
  • Schyns, B., ve Von Collani, G. (2002). A New Occupational Self-efficacy Scale and Its Relation to Personality Constructs and Organizational Variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,11 (2), 219-241.
  • Simola, S. (2011). Relationship Between Occupational Commitment and Ascribed Importance of Organizational Characteristics. Education and Training, 53 (1), 67-81.
  • Swart, J., Kinnie, N. ve Rossenberg, Y.V. (2013). With Whom Do I Share My Knowledge? Commitment Profiles and Knowledge Sharing Behaviour. http://www.olkc2013.com/conference-papers, ET. 11.09.2015.
  • Swift, M. L. ve Virick, M. (2013). Perceived Support, Knowledge Tacitness, and Provider Knowledge Sharing. Group & Organization Management, 38 (6), 717-742.
  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27- 43.
  • Tabachnick, B.G. ve Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics, Sixth Edition, Boston: Pearson Publication.
  • Tak, B. ve Çiftçioğlu, B. A. (2009). Üç Boyutlu Mesleki Bağlılık Ölçeğinin Türkçede Güvenilirlik ve Geçerliliğinin İncelenmesine Yönelik Bir Alan Araştırması. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (1), 35-54.
  • Teng, C.I., Shyu, Y.I.L. ve Chang, H.Y. (2007). Moderating Effects of Profesional Commitment on Hospital Nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Professional Nursing, 23 (1), 47-54.
  • Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. ve Nonaka. I. (2002). Bilginin Üretimi (G. Günay, Çev.) Dışbank Kitapları. İstanbul: Rota Yayınları.
  • Wang, S. ve Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge Sharing: A Review and Directions for Future Research. Human Resource Management Review, 20 (2), 115-131.
  • Wasko M. M. ve Faraj, S. (2000). It is What One Does: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9 (2), 155-173.
  • Wasko, M. M. ve Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
  • Yeniçeri, Ö. ve Demirel, Y. (2007). Örgüt İçi Bilgi Paylaşımına Yönelik Bireysel ve Örgütsel Engeller Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 12, 221-234
  • Yılmaz, V. ve Çelik, H.E. (2009). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi, Ankara: Pegem Akademi.