PLANLI DAVRANIŞ TEORİSİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER

Bu araştırmada, bireyin yeni bir girişimi başlatıp başlatmayacağının önemli bir göstergesi olan ‘girişimcilik niyetini’ etkileyen faktörler, Planlı Davranış Teorisi kapsamında incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın temel amacı, girişimcilik niyetinin belirleyicilerinin neler olduğunun tespit edilmesidir. Girişimcilik niyeti üzerinde etkisi bulunan faktörleri bölgesel temelde ortaya koyarak, Zonguldak örneği üzerinden, ‘Türkiye’deki potansiyel girişimcilerin kimler olabileceği’ sorusunun cevaplanmasına katkıda bulunmak hedeflenmektedir. Araştırmanın bağımsız değişkenlerinin (tutum, algılanan davranış kontrolü, öznel norm, girişimci öz-yeterlilik) girişimcilik niyeti üzerindeki rolleri, Zonguldak ve ilçelerinde KOSGEB tarafından düzenlenen Uygulamalı Girişimcilik Eğitimlerine gönüllü olarak katılan 229 kursiyer üzerinde test edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları, girişimcilik davranışına yönelik tutumların, algılanan davranış kontrolünün, girişimci öz-yeterliliğin ve öznel normların bireyin girişimcilik niyeti üzerinde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir.

DETERMINING THE FACTORS AFFECTING ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOUR

In this research, the factors affecting an individual’s ‘entrepreneurial intention’, which is a significant indicator of whether the individual will start a new enterprise, are examined within the Planned Behavior Theory. The main purpose of the research is to state what the determinants of entrepreneurial intention are. The study aims to contribute to answering the question, ‘Who can be the potential entrepreneurs in Turkey’ by presenting the factors having an impact on entrepreneurial intention on a regional basis through Zonguldak example. The roles of the research's independent variables (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, entrepreneurial self efficacy) on entrepreneurial intentions were tested on 229 trainees participating voluntarily in Applied Entrepreneurship Trainings organized by KOSGEB in Zonguldak and its towns. The results of the research show that attitudes towards entrepreneurial behaviour, perceived entrepreneurial control, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and subjective norms are influential on the entrepreneurial intention of the individual.

___

  • Zhao, F. (2005). Exploring the synergy between entrepreneurship and innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 11(1), 25-41.
  • Zampetakis, L. A., Kafetsios, K., Bouranta, N., Dewett, T., & Moustakis, V. S. (2009). On the relationship between emotional intelligence and entrepreneurial attitudes and intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 15(6), 595-618.
  • Yeşilay, R. B., & Yavaş, V. (2017). Öğrencilerin girişimcilik niyetinin planlanmış davranış teorisi çerçevesinde incelenmesi: Sivil havacılık alanında öğrenim gören önlisans öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, (6)1, 145-172.
  • Yang, J. (2013). The theory of planned behavior and prediction of entrepreneurial intention among Chinese undergraduates. Social Behavior and Personality, 41(3), 367-376.
  • Xu, X., Ni, H., & Ye, Y. (2016). Factors ınfluencing entrepreneurial intentions of chinese secondary school students: an empirical study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(4), 625-635.
  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory And Practice, 31(3), 387-406.
  • Wach, K., & Wojciechowski, L. (2016). Entrepreneurial intentions of students in Poland in the view of Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 83-94.
  • Vesalainen, J., & Pihkala, T. (1999). Motivation structure and entrepreneurial intentions. http://fusionmx.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers99/II/II_B/IIB.html.
  • Uygun, M.,& Güner, E. (2016). Girişimcilik eğiliminin gelişiminde girişimcilik eğitiminin rolü. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, (5)5, 37-57.
  • Tubbs, M. E., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1991). The role of intentions in work motivation: implications for goal-setting theory and research. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 180-199.
  • Top, S. (2006). Girişimcilik keşif süreci. İstanbul: Beta Beta Basım Yayım.
  • Tkachev, A., & Kolvereid, L. (1999). Self-employment intentions among Russian students. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(3), 269-280.
  • Thompson, E. R. (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 669-694.
  • Şeşen, H., & Basım, H.N. (2012). Demografik Faktörler ve Kişiliğin Girişimcilik Niyetine Etkisi: Spor Bilimleri Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, (12), 21-28.
  • Spencer, A. S., Kirchhoff, B. A., & White, C. (2008). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and wealth distribution the essence of creative destruction. International Small Business Journal, 26(1), 9-26.
  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? the effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566-591.
  • Solesvik, M. Z., Westhead, P., Kolvereid, L., & Matlay, H. (2012). Student intentions to become self‐employed: the Ukrainian context. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(3), 441-460.
  • Sluis, J. V. D., Van Praag, M., & Vijverberg, W. (2005). Entrepreneurship selection and performance: a meta-analysis of the ımpact of education in developing economies. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 225-261.
  • Simpeh, K. N. (2011). Entrepreneurship theories and empirical research: a summary review of the literatüre. European Journal of Business and Management, ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online), 3(6).
  • Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business (Fourth Edition). U.S.A: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Schwarz, E. J., Wdowiak, M. A., Almer-Jarz, D. A., & Breitenecker, R. J. (2009). The effects of attitudes and perceived environment conditions on students’ entrepreneurial intent: an Austrian perspective. Education + Training, 51(4), 272-291.
  • Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2013). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291-332.
  • Scherer, R. F., Adams, J. S., Carley, S., & Wiebe, F. A. (1989). Role model performance effects on development of entrepreneurial career preference. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(3), 53-71.
  • Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Greene, P. G. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States, evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial Dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23(4), 263-284.
  • Reynolds, P. D. (2009). Screening item effects in estimating the prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 151-163.
  • Rauch, A., & Hulsink, W. (2015). Putting entrepreneurship education where the intention to act lies: an investigation into the impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial behavior. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(2), 187-204.
  • Piperopoulos, P., & Dimov, D. (2015). Burst bubbles or build steam? entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 970-985
  • Peterman, N. E., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise education: influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 129-144.
  • Özler, N. D. E., Giderler, C., & Baran, H. (2017). Öz yeterlilik ve kontrol odağının bireylerin girişimcilik niyeti üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. International Journal of Management Economics & Business, 13, 736-747.
  • Obschonka, M., Goethner, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Cantner, U. (2012). Social identity and the transition to entrepreneurship: the role of group identification with workplace peers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 137-147.
  • Naktiyok, A., Karabey, C. N., & Gulluce. A. C. (2010); “Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intention: The Turkish Case”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Cilt 6, Sayı 4, s. 419-435.
  • Naktiyok, A., & Timuroğlu, M. K. (2009); “Öğrencilerin Motivasyonel Değerlerinin Girişimcilik Niyetleri Üzerine Etkisi ve Bir Uygulama”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 23, Sayı 3, s. 85-103.
  • Mueller, S. L. (2004). Gender Gaps in Potential for Entrepreneurship Across Countries and Cultures. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 199-220.
  • Mortan, R. A., Ripoll, P., Carvalho, C., & Bernal, M. C. (2014). Effects of emotional intelligence on entrepreneurial intention and self-efficacy. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(3), 97-104.
  • Mei, H., Zhan, Z., Fong, P. S. W., Liang, T., & Ma, Z. (2016). Planned behaviour of tourism students’ entrepreneurial intentions in China. Applied Economics, 48(13), 1240-1254.
  • McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., & Sequeira, J. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self efficacy: refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965-988.
  • Matthews, C. H., & Moser, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal investigation of the impact of family background and gender on interest in small firm ownership. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(2), 29-43.
  • Matthews, C. H., & Moser, S. B. (1995). Family background and gender: implications for interest in small firm ownership. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 7(3), 365-378.
  • Liñán, F., Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2011). Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: start-up intentions of university students in Spain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(3-4), 187-215.
  • Liñán, F., Serrano, J. F., & Romero, I. (2013). Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurship: the mediating effect of culture. Revista de Economía Mundial, 33, 21-47.
  • Liñan, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
  • Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2006). Testing the Entrepreneurial Intention Model On A Two-Country Sample. Universidad de Sevilla, Departamento de Economía Aplicada I, Documents de Treball, s. 1-28.
  • Liñán, F. (2008). Skill and Value Perceptions: How Do They Affect Entrepreneurial Intentions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(3), 257-272.
  • Lee, S. H., & Wong, P. K. (2004). An exploratory study of technopreneurial intentions: a career anchor perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 7-28.
  • Lee, L., Wong, P. K., Der, F. M., & Leung, A. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions: the influence of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 124-136.
  • Lans, T., Gulikers, J., & Batterink, M. (2010). Moving beyond traditional measures of entrepreneurial intentions in a study among life-sciences’ students in the Netherlands. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(3), 259-274.
  • Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341-364.
  • Krueger, Norris F. (2007); “What Lies Beneath? The Experiential Essence of Entrepreneurial Thinking. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(1), 123-138.
  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, Cilt15, Sayı 5-6, s. 411-432.
  • Krueger, N. F., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385-400.
  • Krueger, N. F., & Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: applying the theory of planned behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 5(4), 315-330.
  • Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91-104.
  • Krueger, N. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5-21.
  • Kolvereid, L., & Isaksen, E. (2006). New Business Start-Up and Subsequent Entry Into Self Employment. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 866-885.
  • Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2(1) 47-58.
  • Koh, H. C. (1996). Testing hypotheses of entrepreneurial characteristics: a study of Hong Kong MBA students. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11(3), 12-25.
  • Koçoğlu, M., & Hassan, M. U. (2013). Assessing entrepreneurial intentions of university students: a comparative study of two different cultures: Turkey and Pakistani. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(13), 243-252.
  • Kim, M. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior a meta-analysis of past research. Communication Research, 20(3), 331-364.
  • Kickul, J. & Zaper, J. A. (2000). Untying the knot: do personal and organizational determinants influence entrepreneurial intentions? Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 15(3), 57-77.
  • Kautonen, T., Gelderen, M., & Tornikoski, E. T. (2013). Predicting entrepreneurial behavior: a test of the theory of planned behavior. Applied Economics, 45(6), 697-707.
  • Karimi, S., Biemans, H. J. A., Lans, T., Chizari, M., & Mulder, M. (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education: a study of Iranian students' Entrepreneurial Intentions and Opportunity Identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 187-209.
  • Kalkan, A. (2011). Kişisel tutum, öznel norm ve algılanan davranış kontrolünün girişimcilik niyeti üzerindeki etkisi: üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(14), 189-206.
  • Kalkan, A. (2011 ). Kişisel tutum, öznel norm ve algılanan davranış kontrolünün girişimcilik niyeti üzerindeki etkisi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (2)14,189-206.
  • Kadir, M. B. A., Salim M., & Kamarudinc, H. (2012). The relationship between educational support and entrepreneurial intentions in Malaysian higher learning institution. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2164-2173.
  • Johns, N., & Mattsson, J. (2005). Destination development through entrepreneurship: a comparison of two cases. Tourism Management, 26(4), 605-616.
  • Hui-Chen, C., Kuen-Hung T., & Chen-Yi, P. (2014). The entrepreneurial process: an integrated model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 727-745.
  • Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory And Practice, 41(1), 105-130.
  • Hisrich, R., Langan-Fox, J., & Grant, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship research and practice: a call to action for psychology. American Psychologist, 62(6), 575-589.
  • Güriş, S., & Çağlayan, E. (2010). Ekonometri Temel Kavramlar, İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
  • Gürbüz, Ş., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri Felsefe - Yöntem – Analiz. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) (2017). Global Report 2016/17. http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49812, (Erişim Tarihi 10.12.2017).
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, New York: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), 701-720.
  • Fayolle, A., & Liñán, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67, 663-666.
  • Erikson, R. (1999). A study of entrepreneurial career choices among MBAS-the extended bird model. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 7(1) 1-17.
  • Engle, R. L., Dimitriadi, N., Gavidia, J. V., Schlaegel, C., Delanoe, S., Alvarado, I., He, X., Buame, S., & Wolff, B. (2010). Entrepreneurial intent: a twelve-country evaluation of Ajzen's model of planned behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 16(1), 33-57.
  • Ekici, E., & Turan, M. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinin girişimcilik eğilimi: planlanmış davranışlar teorisi ve girişimcilik eğitiminin rolü. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (26)1, 201-215.
  • Douglas, E., & Shepherd, D. (2002). Self-employment as a career choice: attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 26(3), 81-90.
  • Díaz-García, M. C., & Jiménez-Moreno, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention: the role of gender. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(3), 261-283.
  • Delmar, F., & Davidsson P. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, July 12, 1-23.
  • Debarliev, S., Janeska-Iliev, A., Bozhinovska, T., & Ilieva, V. (2015). Antecedents of entrepreneurial intention: evidence from republic of Macedonia Stojan. BEH - Business and Economic Horizons, 11(3), 143-161.
  • De Noble, A. F., Jung, D., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1999). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: the development of a measure and its relation to entrepreneurial action. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, (Der: D. Reynolds), Babson College: Wellesley, MA, 73-87.
  • Davidsson, P. (1995). Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions. Paper prepared for the RENT IX Workshop. Nov. 23-24, Piacenza, Italy.
  • Çetinkaya Bozkurt, Ö. (2014). Planlanmış davranış teorisi çerçevesinde öğrencilerin girişimci olma niyetlerinin incelenmesi. Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (3) 1, 27-47.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), Hillsdale, NJ.
  • Claar, V. V., Frey, R., Szarucki, M., & TenHaken, V. R. (2012). Hope for the east: entrepreneurial attitudes of MBA students in two transition economies relative to those in the USA. International Journal of Business Excellence, 5(3), 220-237.
  • Cialdini, R. B., Petty R. E., & Cacioppo J. T. (1981). Attitude and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(3), 357-404.
  • Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295-316.
  • Chell, E. (2007). Social enterpreise and entrepreneurship: towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International Small Buisiness Journal, 25(1), 5-26.
  • Carsrud, A., & Brännback Malin. (2011). Entrepreneurial motivations: what do we still need to know? Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 9-26.
  • Campo, J. L. M. (2011). Analysis of the influence of self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intentions. Prospectiva, 9(2), 14-21.
  • Branchet, B., Boissin, J. P., & Hikkerova, L. (2017). Modeling entrepreneurship intentions: an essay of typology. Management International, 21(2), 109-122.
  • Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63-77.
  • Botsaris, C., & Vamvaka, V. (2016). Attitude toward entrepreneurship: structure, prediction from behavioral beliefs, and relation to entrepreneurial intention. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7, 433-460.
  • Bird, B. (1992). The operation of intentions in time: the emergence of the new venture. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17 (1), 11-20.
  • Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453.
  • Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292-303.
  • Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: a measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
  • Başol, O., Dursun, S., & Aytaç, S. (2011). Kişiliğin Girişimcilik Niyeti Üzerine Etkisi: Üniversiteli Gençler Üzerine Bir Uygulama. "İş, Güç" Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, (13)04, 9-22.
  • Basim, H. N., Korkmazyürek, H., & Tokat, A. O. (2008). Çalışanların öz yeterlilik algılamasının yenilikçilik ve risk alma üzerine etkisi: kamu sektöründe bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (19), 121-130.
  • Barbosa, S. D., Gerhardt, M. W., & Kickul, J. R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86-104.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Autio, E., Keeley, R. H., Klofsten, M., Parker, G. C., & Hay, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(2), 145-160.
  • Astuti, R. D. & Martdinaty, F. (2012). Students entrepreneurial intentions by using theory of planned behavior: The case in Indonesia. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 6(2), 100-112.
  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499.
  • Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233-247.
  • Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  • Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
  • Abbot, M. L. (2017). Using Statistics in The Social and Health Sciences with Spss and Excel. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NJ.
Business and Management Studies: An International Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-2586
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: ACC Publishing
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

THE MEDIATING ROLE OF GREEN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE BETWEEN SUSTAINABILITY AND GREEN INNOVATION: A RESEARCH IN TURKISH COMPANIES1

MÜBEYYEN TEPE KÜÇÜKOĞLU, R. İbrahim PINAR

THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING ACTIVITIES ON BRAND AWARENESS, BRAND IMAGE AND BRAND LOYALTY

YUSUF BİLGİN

PSİKOLOJİK GÜÇLENDİRME DÜZEYLERİNE BAĞLI OLARAK ÖĞRETMENLERİN İŞE YÖNELİK DAVRANIŞLARINDA FARKLILIKLAR OLUŞUR MU?: BİR ALAN ARAŞTIRMASI

İSMAİL BAKAN, BURCU ERŞAHAN, TUBA BÜYÜKBEŞE, Mustafa Tuncer OKUMUŞ, Ayşegül AKMEŞE

MUŞ İLİNİN KADIN GİRİŞİMCİLİK EĞİLİMİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR PİLOT ARAŞTIRMA1

ZELİHA TEKİN

MUHASEBE EĞİTİMİ ALAN ÖĞRENCİLERİN DERİN VE YÜZEYSEL ÖĞRENME YAKLAŞIMLARININ ÇEŞİTLİ DEĞİŞKENLER AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

MERYEM ÖZTÜRK

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YEŞİL YENİLİK İLİŞKİSİNDE YEŞİL ÖRGÜT KÜLTÜRÜNÜN ARACILIK ROLÜ: TÜRK İŞLETMELERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Mübeyyen TEPE KÜÇÜKOĞLU, R. İbrahim PINAR

VEKÂLET TEORİSİNİN PERDE ARKASINDAKİ KURUCU SENDROMU: KURUMSAL YÖNETİŞİM VE KURUMSAL SOSYAL SORUMLULUĞA BİR TEHDİT UNSURU

Şafak GÜNDÜZ

SOSYAL MEDYA PAZARLAMA AKTİVİTELERİNİN MARKA BİLİNİRLİĞİNE, MARKA İMAJINA VE MARKA SADAKATİNE ETKİSİ

Yusuf BİLGİN

GÜÇLÜ BİR METODOLOJİK ARAŞTIRMA YÖNTEMİ OLARAK ÇEŞİTLEME

Mohammed ASHOUR

CSR COMPARISON BETWEEN FAMILY BUSINESSES AND NON-FAMILY BUSINESS

ÖMER YAZICI, Douglas MCWILLIAMS, SEYDAHMET ERCAN