STRATEJİ EĞİTİMİNİN LİSANS ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN STRATEJİ KULLANIM SIKLIĞINA VE YAZMA SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞTIĞI ZORLUKLARA DAİR ALGILARINA ETKİSİ

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğrencilerin yazma sürecinde karşılaştıkları zorlukları belirlemek, yazma stratejileri eğitiminin yazma sürecine yönelik algıları üzerindeki etkisini ve yazma stratejileri kullanımına etkisini incelemektir. Bu amaçlar için karma yöntem araştırma tasarımı kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın katılımcıları Bingöl Üniversitesi İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü'nde öğrenim gören 78 lisans öğrencisinden oluşmuştur. Bu katılımcılar 42 kontrol grubu ve 37 deney grubu olmak üzere ikiye ayrıldı. Deney grubundaki 24 öğrenciyle iki açık uçlu soruyla görüşülmüştür. Görüşme sonucunda elde edilen bulgular, öğrencilerin yazma sürecinde fikir sunma, bu fikirleri düzenleme, dilbilgisi kurallarına uyma, zamanı yönetme, uygun kelime seçme ve noktalama işaretlerini doğru kullanma açısından sorun yaşadıklarını ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, hemen hemen tüm katılımcıların strateji eğitiminden sonra strateji kullanımının yazma öncesi, yazma esnası ve yazma sonrası aşamalarda arttığını ve nitel veri sonuçlarının katılımcıların yazma sürecinin her aşamasında strateji kullanımından yana olduklarını ortaya çıkarmıştır.

THE EFFECT OF STRATEGY TRAINING ON UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ FREQUENCY OF STRATEGY USE AND PERCEPTIONS OF CHALLENGES FACED IN WRITING PROCESS

The aim of this study is to determine the difficulties that students face in writing process, to investigate the effect of writing strategies training on their perception towards writing process, and on the students’ use of the writing strategies. For these purposes, a mixed-method research design was used. Participants consisted of 78 undergraduate students studying in the English Language and Literature Department at Bingöl University. Control group consisted of 42 participants where as there were 37 participants in experimental group. 24 students in the experimental group were interviewed through two open- ended questions. The findings obtained through the interview revealed that students experienced problems in the writing process in terms of presenting ideas, organizing these ideas, obeying the grammar rules, managing the time, choosing appropriate words and using proper punctuation marks. It was also revealed that almost all participants’ strategy use increased after strategy instruction at pre- writing, during writing and post writing stages and the qualitative data results indicated that participants were in favor of strategy use for each stage of the writing process

___

  • ADRIATI, M. (2013), “The use of clustering technique in teaching writing narrative text”, Journal of English and Education, 1 (2), 39-46. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/531a/57ccc427f1c7b6f5e852bc1cf5635 aa38b37.pdf
  • ALHAYSONY, M. (2017), “Language learning strategies use by Saudi EFL students: The effect of duration of English language study and gender”, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(1), 18– 28.doi:10.17507/tpls.0701.03
  • ALIAS , A. A., MANAN, N., YUSOF, J., & PANDIAN, A., (2012), “The use of facebook as language learning strategy (lls) training tool on college students’ lls use and academic writing performance”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67(3), 36-44 doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.305
  • ALLODWAN, T. A., & IBNIAN, S. S. (2014), “The effect of using the process approach to writing on developing university students’ essay writing skills in EFL”, Review of Arts and Humanities, 3(2),139-155. Retrieved from :http://rahnet.com/journals/rah/Vol_3_No_2_June_2014/11.pdf
  • ALKUBAIDI, M., (2014), “The relationship between Saudi english major university students’ writing performance and their learning style and strategy use”, English Language Teaching, 7(4), 83-95. doi: 10.5539/elt.v7n4p83
  • ARNDT, V. (1987), “Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing”, ELT Journal, 41(8), 257-267. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.464.4662&re p=rep1&type=
  • BAI, B. (2016), Writing strategies and strategy-based instruction in Singapore primary schools, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • BAKER, W., & BOONKIT, K. (2004), “Learning strategies in reading and writing: EAP contexts”, Relc, 35(3), 299–328. doi:10.1177/0033688205052143
  • BROWN, D., (2006), Principles of language learning and teaching (Fifth Edition), Pearson Longman Publishing.
  • BRYMAN, A. (2004), Social research methods (2nd edition), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • CHU, W., LİN, D., CHEN, T.,TSAI, P.,& WANG, C. (2015), “The relationships between ambiguity tolerance, learning strategies, and learning Chinese as a second language”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences , English Teaching Forum, 49(2), 26- 33. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2014.10.015
  • COHEN, A.D., & DÖRNYEI, Z. (2002), “Focus on the language learner”, In: Schmitt, N. (Eds.), An introduction to applied linguistics. London: Arnold Hodder.
  • CORNETT, C. E. (1983), What you should know about teaching and learning styles, Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation Press.
  • CRESWELL, J. W. (2012), Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.), Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • DÖRNYEI, Z. (2005), The Psychology of language learner: Individual differences in second languageacquisition. London: Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • DUJISIK, D. (2008), The effect of prewriting strategy training guided by computer-based procedural facilitation on ESL students’ strategy use, writing quantity and writing quality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Retrieved from http://www.scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/221.
  • ELLIS, R. (2004), Individual differences in second language learning, Oxford: Blackwell
  • FAREED, M., ASHRAF, A., & BILAL, M. (2016), “ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factor and suggestions”, Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4 (2016), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.20547/jess0421604201
  • GARDNER, R. C. (1985), Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation, London: Edward Arnold Publishers.
  • GHASEMI, A. & ZAHEDIASL, S. (2012), “Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non- statisticians”, International Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism 10(2),486-489. Doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505
  • GHIASVAND, M. , NADERI, M. ,TAFRESHI, M. , AHMEDI, F. , & HUSAINI, M. (2017), “Relationship between time management skills and anxiety and academic motivation of students in Tehran”, Journal of Electronic Physician, 9(1), 3678-3684. doi: 10.19082/3678.
  • GRIFFITHS, C. (2008), Lessons from good language learners, Cambridge: Cambridge UP
  • KLIMOVA, B. (2014), “Approaches to the teaching of writing skills”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112(2014), 147–151. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1149
  • LEKI, I. (1995), “Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum”, Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL), 29(2), 235-260. doi:10.2307/3587624
  • LONG, M. (1990), “Maturational constraints on language development”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 251-285. doi:10.1017/S02722631000009165
  • MAAROF, N., & MURAT, M. (2015), “Writing strategies used by ESL upper secondary school students.Canadian center of science and education”, International Education Studies, 6(4),47-58. doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n4p47
  • MANOUCHEHRY, A., FARANGI, M.R., FATEMI, M.A. & QAVIKEFT, F. (2014), T”he effect of two brainstorming strategies on the improvement of Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ writing skill”, International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 6 (4), 176-187.
  • MASTAN, M.E. & MAAROF, N. (2014), “ESL learners’ self-efficacy beliefs and strategy use in expository writing”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116, 2360 – 2363. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.573
  • MOHAMMADI, M., BIRJANDI, P., & MAFTOON, P. (2015), “Learning strategy training and the shifting learners’ beliefs about language learning: a reading comprehension context”, Sage Open Publication, 1(11), 11-25. doi:10.1177/2158244015579726
  • NASIHAH, M., & CAHYONO, B.Y. (2017), “Language learning strategies, motivation, and writing achievement of Indonesian EFL students”, Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 8(1), 250 263. doi:10.24.093/awej.vol8no1.18
  • O’MALLEY, J., CHAMOT, A., MANZANARES, G., ROCCO, P. R., & KUPPER, L. (1985), “Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language”, TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 557-584. doi: 10.2307/3586278
  • O'MALLEY, J. M., & A. U. CHAMOT (1990), Learning strategies in second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ONOZAWA, C. (2010), “A study of the process writing approach”, Journal of Kyoai Gakuen College, 10, 153-163.
  • Retrieved from: https://www.kyoai.ac.jp/college/ronshuu/no10/onozawa2.pdf OXFORD, R. L. (1990), Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know, Boston: Heinle & Heinle Press.
  • PASAND, P.G., HAGHI, E.B. (2013), “Process-product approach to writing: the effect of Model Essays on EFL Learners’ writing Accuracy”, International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2 (1), 75-79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.75
  • PETRIC, B., & CZARL, B. (2003), “Validating a writing strategy questionnaire”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2003), 187–215. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00020-4
  • ROSS, S. & MORRISON, G. (2003), Experimental research methods, Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/201382131_Experimental_Re search_Methods [accessed Jul 21 2021].
  • RAIMES, A. (1985), “What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing”, TESOL Quarterly, 19 (2), 229-258.doi: 10.2307/3586828
  • REFUGIO, C. (2018), Empirical research on Mann-Whitney U-test. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329697950_Empirical_Resear ch_on_MannWhitney_test
  • REID, J. (2001), Teaching ESL writing, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Heinle and Heinle Press.
  • RUBIN, J. (1987), Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology, In A. Wenden & Joan Rubin (Eds.).
  • SAVILLE-TROIKE, M. (2006), Introducing second language acquisition, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • SMET, M.J.R., BRAND-GRUWEL, S., LEIJTEN, M. & KIRSCHNER, P.A. (2014), “Writing argumentative texts: The effects of electronic outlining on students’ writing product and process: Sociocultural theory in writing strategies application”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(6), 557-554. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00418.x
  • SNOW, R. E., CORNO, L., & JACKSON, D. N. (1996), “Individual differences in affective and conative functions”, In D. Berliner (R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243-310), New York: Macmillan.
  • YOUNG, D. J., & OXFORD, R. L. (1997), “A gender-related analysis of strategies used to process written input in the native language and a foreign language”, Applied Language Learning 8(2), 1-20. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ552194
  • WATCHARAPUNYAWONG, S., & USAHA, S. (2013), “Thai EFL students’ writing in different text type: Theinterference of the first language”, English Language Teaching, 6(1), 67-78. doi:10.5539/elt.v6n1p67
  • WENDEN, A. L. (1991), “Metacognitive strategies in L2 Writing: A case for task knowledge”, In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1991 (pp. 302-322), Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • WISCHGOLL, A. (2017), “Improving undergraduates’ and postgraduates’ academic writing skills with strategy training and feedback”, Frontiers in Education, 2(33),1 5-30. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00033
  • ZAMEL, V. (1987), “Recent research on writing pedagogy”, TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 697- 715.doi: 10.2307/3586990
  • ZEN, D. (2005), Teaching ESL/EFL writing beyond language skills: Affiliation, Southeast Missouri State University. Publication: Paper presented at the 3rd International Annual, Tonguha, China.