___

• 1. Abraham, A. ve Seyyed, F. J.. (2006). Information Transmission between the Gulf Equity Markets of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. Research in International Business and Finance, 20: 276-285.
• 2. Aktar, I.. (2009). Is There any Comovement between Stock Markets of Turkey, Russia and Hungary? International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 29: 192-200.
• 3. Alkulaib, Y. A., Najand, M. ve Mashayekh, A.. (2007). Dynamic Linkages among Equity Markets in the Middle East and North African Countries. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 19: 43-53.
• 4. Altinay, G. ve Karagol, E.. (2004). Structural Break, Unit Root, and the Causality between Energy Consumption and GDP in Turkey. Energy Economics, 26: 985-994.
• 5. Altinay, G. ve Karagol, E.. (2005). Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from Turkey. Energy Economics, 27: 849-856.
• 6. Bala, L. ve Premaratne, G.. (2003). Stock Market Volatility: Examining North America, Europe and Asia. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=375380 (Erişim Tarihi: 27/03/2009).
• 7. Bali, T. G. ve Weinbaum, D.. (2007). A Conditional Extreme Value Volatility Estimator Based on High-Frequency Returns. Journal of Economic Dynamics Control, 31: 361-397.
• 8. Becker, R., Clements, A. E. ve White, S. I.. (2007). Does Implied Volatility Provide any Information Beyond that Captured in Model-Based Volatility Forecasts?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31: 2535-2549.
• 9. Blair, B., Poon, S-H. ve Taylor, S. J.. (2001). Forecasting S&P 100 Volatility: The Incremental Information Content of Implied Volatilities and High-Frequency Index Returns. Journal of Econometrics, 105: 5-26.
• 10. Bollerslev, T.. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. 31: 307-327.
• 11. Cheung, Y.W. ve Ng, L. K.. (1996). A Causality-in-Variance Test and Its Applications to Financial Market Prices. Journal of Econometrics. 72: 33–48.
• 12. Constantinou, E., Georgiades, R., Kazandjian, A. ve Kouretas, G. P.. (2006). Mean and Variance Causality between the Cyprus Stock Exchange and Major Equity Markets. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 3: 104-119.
• 13. Egert, B. ve Kocenda, E.. (2007). Interdependence between Eastern and Western European Stock Market: Evidence from Intraday Data. Economic Systems, 31: 184-203.
• 14. Enders, W.. (2004). Applied Econometric Time Series. John Wiley&Sons Inc., USA.
• 15. Engle, R. F.. (1982). Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of UK Inşation. Econometrica, 50: 987–1008.
• 16. Engle, R. F., Ito, T. ve Lin, W.. (1990). Meteor Showers or Heat Waves? Heterokedastic Intra Daily Volatility in the Foreign Exchange Market. Econometrica, 58: 525-542.
• 17. Gebka, B. ve Serwa, D.. (2007). Intra – and Inter – Regional Spillovers between Emerging Capital Markets Around the World. Research in International Business and Finance, 21: 203-221.
• 18. Glosten, L. R., Jaganathan, R. ve Runkle, D. (1993). On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Normal Excess Return on Stocks. Journal of Finance, 48: 1779-1801.
• 19. Harju, K. ve Hussain, S. M.. (2008). Intraday Return and Volatility Spillovers Across International Equity Markets. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 22: 205-220.
• 20. http://finance.yahoo.com. (Erişim Tarihi: 20/03/2009).
• 21. http://www.mscibarra.com. (Erişim Tarihi: 20/03/2009).
• 22. Hu, J. W-S., Chen, M-Y., Fok, R. C. W. ve Huang, B-W.. (1997). Causality in Volatility and Volatility Spillover Effects between US, Japan and Four Equity Markets in the South China Growth Triangular. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 7: 351-367.
• 23. Kanas, A. ve Kouretas, G.. (2003). Mean and Variance Causality between Official and Parallel Currency Markets: Evidence from Four Latin American Countries. Financial Review, 37: 137-163.
• 24. Lee, J. ve Strazicich, M. C.. (2003). Minimum LM Unit Root Test with One Structural Break. Appalachion State University Working Papers, No: 04-17: 1-15.
• 25. Lee, S. J. (2009). Volatility Spillover Effects among Six Asian Countries. Applied Economics Letters, 16: 501-508.
• 26. Li, H. ve Majerowska, E.. (2008). Testing Stock Market Linkages for Poland and Hungary: A Multivariate GARCH Approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 22: 247-266.
• 27. Nelson, D. B.. (1991). Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach. Econometrica, 59: 347–370.
• 28. Ng, A.. (2000). Volatility Spillover Effects from Japan and the US to the Pacific Basin. Journal of International Money and Finance, 19: 207-233.
• 29. Özdemir, Z. A. ve Cakan, E.. (2007). Non-linear Dynamic Linkages in the International Stock Markets. Physica A, 377: 173-180.
• 30. Phillips, P. C. ve Perron, P.. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75: 335-46.
• 31. Ross, S. A.. (1989). Information and Volatility: The No-Arbitrage Martingale Approach to Timing and Resolution Irrelevancy. Journal of Finance, 44: 1-17.
• 32. Sola, M., Spagnolo, F. ve Spagnolo N.. (2002). A Test for Volatility Spillovers.Economics Letters, 76: 77-84.
• 33. Theodossiou, P., Kahya, E., Koutmos, G. ve Christofi, A.. (1997). Volatility Reversion and Correlation Structure of Returns in Major International Stock Markets. The Financial Review, 32: 205-224.
• 34. Verma, P. ve Ozuna. T.. (2007). International Stock Market Linkages and Spillovers: Evidence from Three Latin American Countries. Latin American Business Review, 8: 60-81.
• 35. Zivot, E. ve Andrews, W. K. D.. (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, The Oil-Price Shock, and The Unit-Root Hypothesis, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10: 251-270.