___

• American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/tools/benchol/bolframe.htm
• Alamin, A. A., Shaoqing, G., & Le, Z. (2015). The development of educational technology policies (1996-2012) lessons from China and the USA. International Education Studies, 8(6), 142-150.
• doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p142
• Al-Alwan, A.F. (2008). Self-regulated learning in high and low achieving students at AlHussein Bin Talal University (AHU) in Jordan. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 1(1), 1-13.
• Arbuckle, J.L. (2012). Ibm amos 21 user’s guide. chicago: SPSS Inc. Retrieved fromftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/amos/21.0/en/Manu als/IBM_SPSS_Amos_Users_Guide.pdf
• Atkinson, J.W. (1966). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. In J.W. Atkinson, & N.T. Feather (Eds.), A theory of achievement motivation (pp. l-31). New York: Wiley.
• Baloğlu, M. (2005). Matematik kaygısı derecelendirme ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması, dil geçerliği ve ön psikometri incelemesi [Adaptation of the mathematics anxiety rating scale to Turkish, language validity and preliminar psychometric properties]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi[Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice], 5(1), 7- 30.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2),191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
• Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Eds.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Company.
• Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş amos uygulamaları [Structural Equation Modeling Introduction: AMOS Applications]. İstanbul: Ezgi Kitabevi.
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199- 231.
• Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Self-regulation. an introductory overview. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.1-9). San Diego: Academic Press.
• Bong, M. (2004). Academic motivation in self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal orientations, and attributional beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 287- 298. doi: 10.3200/JOER.97.6.287-298
• Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445-455.
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelingwith amos: basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Madison, NY: Routledge.
• CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (2001). Education technology must be ıncluded in comprehensive education legislation. policy paper. Retrieved from http://www.hscdsb.on.ca/pdf/publications/5/55/CEO%20Forum%202001%20Policy%20P aper.pdf
• Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, selfregulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 248-263.
• Çokluk, O., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları[Multivariate statistics for the social sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications] (2nd ed.). Ankara: PegemA Akademi.
• Dermitzaki, I., Stavroussi, P., Vavougios, D., & Kotsis, K. T. (2012). Adaptation of the students' motivation towards science learning (SMTSL) questionnaire in the Greek language. European Journal of Psychology Education, 28, 747-766. doi: 10.1007/s10212-012-0138-1
• Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R.D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830-847. doi: 10.2307/1131221
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
• Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02291575
• Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Eds.), Instructionaldesign theories and models: an overwiew of their current status (pp.386-434). Hillsdate, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). NY: Guilford Press.
• Liou, P.Y., & Kuo, P.J. (2014). Validation of an instrument to measure students’ motivation and self-regulation towards technology learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(2), 79-96. doi:10.1080/02635143.2014.893235.
• Malpass, J.R., O'Neil, H.F., & Hocevar, D. (1999). Self‐regulation, goal orientation, self‐ efficacy, worry, and high‐stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 21(4), 281-288, doi: 10.1080/02783199909553976
• Martin, B.L., & Brigg, L.J. (1986). Other dimensions of the effective domain: emotional development and feelings, interest and motivation, social develpment and group Dynamics, attributions. In B. L.M. Martin, & L.J. Brigg (Eds.), The affective and cognitive domains: ıntegration for ınstruction and research (pp.191-222). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications Englewood Cliffs, Academic Press.
• Meece, J.L. (2003). Applying learner-centered principles to middle school education. Theory Into Practice, 42(2), 109-116, doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4202_4
• Meece, J.L., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Hoyle, R.H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523.
• Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 18, 30-38.
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. [Adobe Digital Edtions version]. doi: 10.17226/4962
• Öncü, H. (2006). Motivasyon (güdüleme) [motivation]. L. Küçükahmet (Ed.), Sınıf yönetimi içinde [Classroom Management] (pp. 167-189). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199. doi:10.3102/00346543063002167
• Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D. (1996) Motivation in education: theory, research and application. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/PS.html#history
• Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269-286.
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
• Schmeck, R.R. (1988). An introduction to strategies and styles of learning, In Schmeck, R.R. (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp.3-19). New York: Plenum Press.
• Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1992). Validation of learning strategy interventions for students with LD: Results of a programmatic research effort. In Y.L. Wong (Ed.), Contemporary intervention research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (pp.22-46). New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Schunk, D.H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspsctive on achivement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48-58. doi: 10.1080/00461528409529281
• Schunk, D.H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173-208.
• Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3- 4), 207-231. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
• Schunk, D.H., & Swartz, C.W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 337-354.
• Stolk, J., & Harari, J. (2014). Student motivations as predictors of high-level cognitions in project-based classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(3), 231-247. doi: 10.1177/1469787414554873
• Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (5. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Tuan, H., Chin, C., & Shieh, S. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000323737
• Tosun, C., & Şekerci, A.R. (2015). The role of motivation in self regulation skills in eight grade students’ science classess. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 17(1), 1-29. doi: 10.17556/jef.97746
• VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015. doi: 10.1177/0013164497057006009
• Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2159-2179. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.541529
• Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2012). Gender differences in student motivation and self-regulation in science learning: a multi-group structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10(6), 1347-1368. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9339-y
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265-310. doi: 10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
• Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Yoon, K.S., Harold, R.D., Arbreton, A.J.A., Freedman-Doan, C, & Blumenfeld, P.C. (1997). Change in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451-469. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451
• Yılmaz, H., & Huyugüzel-Cavaş, P. (2007). Reliability and validity study of the students’ motivation toward science learning questionnaire (in Turkish). Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 430-440.
• Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. (2000). Self-regulation. directions and challenges for future research. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation (pp. 749-768). New York: Academic Press.
• Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
• Zimmerman, B.J. (1998). Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3),73-86. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292
• Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
• Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. doi: 10.3102/0002831207312909
• Zimmerman, B.J., & Pons, M.M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning-strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628. doi: 10.3102/00028312023004614
• Zimmerman, B.J., & Pons, M.M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
• Zimmerman, B.J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In G.D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 105-125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.