YDİ Sınıflarında Penzu Yoluyla Yazma Becerisini Geliştirmek İçin Bütünleşik Bir Etkinlik Olarak Çevrimiçi Günlük Tutma

Bu çalışma, Web 2.0 araçlarından biri olan Penzu üzerinde durmuştur. Penzu, kullanıcıların kolayca not alabilecekleri ve onları Web ‘de tutabilecekleri bir tür çevrimiçi günlüktür. Çalışma Penzu'nun yabancı dil sınıflarında dil öğrenenlerin yazma becerilerini geliştirmek için bütünleşik bir etkinlik olarak uygulanabilirliğini tartışmıştır. Bu bağlamda, örnek bir Penzu sayfası hazırlanmış ve Türkiye'deki bir devlet üniversitesinde yabancı dil okutmanlarına tanıtılmıştır. Çalışma nitel bir araştırma izlemiştir. Katılımcılar ile yüz yüze görüşmeler yapılmış ve veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme soruları aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Verileri analiz ettikten sonra, sonuçlar tanımlayıcı olarak bildirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, öncelikle dil okutmanlarının, öğrencilerin yazma becerilerini geliştirmek için Penzu'yu yabancı dil öğretimi derslerinde bütünleşik bir etkinlik olarak uygulama taraftarı olduklarını göstermiştir. Çalışma ayrıca, Penzu'nun dil eğitimi ortamlarında uygulanmasını teşvik edebilecek veya engelleyebilecek bazı güçlü ve zayıf yönleri de bildirmiştir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, Penzu'nun yazma becerisi için bütünleşik bir etkinlik olarak uygulanmasıyla geleneksel yabancı dil öğretimi sınıflarını zenginleştirmeye ve Web 2.0 araçlarının dil eğitimi ortamlarında uygulanmasını teşvik eden yeni çalışmaların önünü açmaya çalışmıştır.

Keeping Online Diary as an Integrated Activity for Developing Writing Skill in EFL Classes through Penzu

The present study focused on one of the Web 2.0 tools, Penzu. Penzu is a kind ofonline diary through which users can easily take notes and keep them on theWeb. The study discussed the applicability of Penzu in foreign language classesas an integrated activity to develop language learners’ writing skills. In thisrespect, a sample Penzu page was prepared and introduced to foreign languageteaching instructors at a state university in Turkey. The study followed aqualitative inquiry. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with the participants,and the data were collected through semi-structured interview questions. Afteranalyzing the data, the results were reported descriptively. The results primarilyindicated that the language instructors were in favor of implementing Penzu as anintegrated activity in foreign language teaching classes to enhance students’writing skills. The study also reported several strengths and weaknesses whichmay promote or hinder the implementation of Penzu in language educationcontexts. All in all, this study attempted to enrich traditional foreign languageteaching classes by implementation of Penzu as an integrated activity for writingskill, and to pave the way for further studies that foster application of Web 2.0tools in language education contexts.

___

  • Alshumaimeri, Y. (2011). The effects of wikis on foreign language students writing performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 28, 755 – 763.
  • Alsmari, N. A. (2019). Fostering EFL students’ paragraph writing using Edmodo. English Language Teaching, 12(10), 44-54.
  • Anglin, M. S. (2017). Technology integration by general education teachers of English language learners. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Walden University, Washington.
  • Arslan, S. (2018). A review on the delivery of the professional development programs for EFL teachers: Face-toface, online and blended programs. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 13(27), 97-106.
  • Aşıksoy, G. (2018). ELT students’ attitudes and awareness towards the use of Web 2.0 technologies for language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 240-251.
  • Balbay, S., & Erkan, G. (2018). Perceptions of instructors on using Web 2.0 tools in academic English courses. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 10(2), 45-60.
  • Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Blackmore-Squires, S. (2010). An investigation into the use of a blog as a tool to improve writing in the second language classroom. (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of Manchester, UK.
  • Bloch, J. (2004). Second language cyber rhetoric: A study of Chinese L2 writers in an online usenet group. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 66-82.
  • Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 25-37.
  • Cho, M. H., & Castaneda, D. A. (2019). Motivational and affective engagement in learning Spanish with a mobile application. System 81, 90-99.
  • Coşkun, A., & Marlowe, Z. (2015). Technology in ELT: English teachers investigate Animoto and Fotobabble. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 119-128.
  • Dizon, G., & Thanyawatpokin, B. (2018). Web 2.0 tools in the EFL classroom: Comparing the effects of Facebook and blogs on L2 writing and interaction. The EUROCALL Review, 26(1), 29-42.
  • Featro, S. M., & DiGregorio, D. (2016). Blogging as an instructional tool in the ESL classroom. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 20(1), 1-9.
  • Güler, S., & Özkan, Y. (2018). Podcast applications in pre-service language teacher education from a constructivist perspective. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(3), 131-141.
  • Hurlburt, S. (2008). Defining tools for a new learning space: Writing and reading class blogs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 182-189.
  • Konstantinidis, A., Theodosiadou, D., & Pappos, C. (2013). Web 2.0 tools for supporting teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 14(4), 287-295.
  • Li, K., Bado, N., Smith, J., & Moore, D. (2013). Blogging for teaching and learning: An examination of experience, attitudes, and levels of thinking. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(3), 172-186.
  • McGrail, E., & Davis, A. (2011). The influence of classroom blogging on elementary student writing. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(4), 415-437.
  • Meechai, J. (2010). Thai EFL online diaries: literacy practice and self-expression. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
  • Morgan, L. (2012). Generation Y, learner autonomy and the potential of Web 2.0 tools for language learning and teaching. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(3), 166-176.
  • Murray, D. C. (2017). The design and implementation of a peer mentoring program for international students at Morehead State University. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Morehead State University, Kentucky.
  • Mynard, J. (2007). A blog as a tool for reflection for English language learners. Asian EFL Journal, Retrieved from: https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/pta_Nov_07_jm.pdf
  • Noytim, U. (2010). Weblogs enhancing EFL students’ English language learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, 1127–1132.
  • Olshtain, E. (2001). Functional task for mastering the mechanics of writing and going just beyond. In M. CelceMurcia (Eds.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.207-217).UK: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Park, S. W. (2013). The potential of Web 2.0 tools to promote reading engagement in a general education course. TechTrends, 57(2), 46-53.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed). London: Sage.
  • Pop, A. (2010). The impact of the new technologies in foreign language instruction our experience. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, 1185–1189.
  • Sun, Y. C., & Yang, F. Y. (2015). I help, therefore, I learn: service learning on Web 2.0 in an EFL speaking class. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), 202-219.
  • Ulrich, J., & Karvonen, M. (2011). Faculty instructional attitudes, interest, and intention: Predictors of Web 2.0 use in online courses. Internet and Higher Education 14, 207–216.
  • Vurdien, R. (2013). Enhancing writing skills through blogging in an advanced English as a Foreign Language class in Spain. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 126-143.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. Baskı) [Qualitative research methods in social sciences (10th Ed.]. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing