Akademik Benlik Kavramı ve Örgütsel Faktörlerin Akademik Başarı Üzerindeki Etkisi

Üniversite düzeyinde öğrenci başarısı bir dizi değişkenden etkilenmektedir. Akademik benlik kavramı ve örgütsel faktörler bu değişkenlerden önemli olanları arasında yer alır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, akademik benlik kavramının ve örgütsel faktörlerin üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisini ve bu durumun cinsiyet, yıl, kalınan yer, anne-baba eğitim durumu, tercih değişkenlerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini Ankara ili merkez ilçelerde bulunan devlet üniversitelerinde okuyan öğrencilerden rastgele olarak seçilmiş 460 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Veriler Matovu Akademik Benlik Kavramı Ölçeği (MABKÖ) ve Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarılarını Etkileyen Örgütsel Faktörler Ölçeği (ÖBEÖFÖ) aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, cinsiyet, üniversite yılı ve kalınan yer, akademik benlik kavramı ve Yönetsel Hizmet ve Uygulamalar ve Fiziksel Ortam ve Donanım faktörlerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarısını olumlu olarak etkilediği bulunmuştur. Akademik benlik kavramı başta olmak üzere, akademik başarıyı etkilediği düşünülen farklı öğrenci özelliklerinin birlikte değerlendirildiği çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

The Effects of Academic Self-Concept and Organizational Factors on Academic Achievement

University students’ achievement is influenced by a number of factors. Academicself-concept and organizational factors are among the significant ones. This studyaims to investigate the effects of academic self-concept and organizational factorson university students’ achievement and to discover whether this varies accordingto such variables as gender, grade, place of accommodation, educational status ofthe parents, and preference. The sample of the study consisted of the randomlyselected 450 university students attending private and state universities inprovincial Ankara. The data were collected using Matovu Academic Self-ConceptScale and Organizational Factors Scale. As a result of the study, it was found thatgender, the grade, the place of accommodation, administrative services andpractices, and physical setting and equipment positively affected studentachievement. Further studies are needed to investigate the combined effects of thevariables, including academic self-concept, thought to have an effect on studentachievement at university.

___

  • Arlı, E. (2013). Barınma yerinin üniversite öğrencilerinin kişisel ve sosyal gelişim ve akademik başari üzerindeki etkilerinin odak grup görüşmesi ile incelenmesi [Review of the effects of housing place on individual and social development and academic success of university students by focus group discussion]. Journal of Higher Education & Science, 3(2), 173-178.
  • Arseven, A.D. (1986). Benlik tasarımı okul gelişimi ve başarısı ile ilişkisi [The relationship between self-concept, school development and success]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 1, 15-26.
  • Awad, G. H. (2007). The role of racial identity, academic self-concept, and self-esteem in the prediction of academic outcomes for African American students. Journal of Black Psychology, 33(2), 188-207.
  • Bowman, N. A. (2014). Conceptualizing openness to diversity and challenge: Its relation to college experiences, achievement, and retention. Innovative Higher Education, 39(4), 277–291.
  • Cantekin, Ö. F. (2015). Küreselleşme ve eğitim: “Homo Economicus” eğitim anlayışının dönüşümü [Globalization and education: The transformation of the “Homo Economicus” view of education]. Academical Elegance, 2(4), 43-72.
  • Cantekin, Ö. F. & Gökler, R. (2019). Matovu akademik benlik kavrami ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması [The adaptation study of Matovu academic self-concept scale to Turkish]. Turkish Studies Social Sciences, 14(4), 1355-1366.
  • De Koning, B. B., Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., Smeets, G., & Van der Molen, H. T. (2013). Impact of binding study advice on study behavior and pre-university education qualification factors in a problem-based psychology bachelor program. Studies Higher Education, 39(5), 835–847.
  • Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. The American Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 17−31.
  • De Wit, K., Heerwegh, D., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2012). Do ICT competences support educational attainment at university? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 1–25.
  • Dika, S. L. (2012). Relations with faculty as social capital for college students: Evidence from Puerto Rico. Journal of College Student Development, 53(4), 596–610.
  • Dean, Raymond S. (1977). Effects of Self-concept on Learning with Gifted Children. The Journal of Educational Research, 70(6), 315-318.
  • Ekinci, E., & Gökler, R. (2017). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin akademik özyeterliklerinin ve akademik erteleme davranışlarının öğrenilmiş çaresizlikleri üzerine etkisi [The effect of secondary students’ academic selfsufficiency and academic procrastination behaviors on their learned helplessness]. Journal of International Social Research, 10(50), 378-385.
  • Fenning, B., & May, L. N. (2013). “Where there is a will, there is an A”: Examining the roles of self-efficacy and self-concept in college students' current educational attainment and career planning. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 635–650.
  • Friedman, B. A., & Mandel, R. G. (2011). Motivation predictors of college student academic performance and retention. Journal of College Student Retention, 13(1), 1–15.
  • Frisby, C. L., & Tucker, C. M. (1993). Black children's perceptions of self: Implications for educators. The Educational Form, 57(2), 146-156.
  • Gibb, S.J., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2008). Gender differences in educational achievement to age 25. Australian Journal of Education, 52(1), 63–80.
  • Gibbison, G. A., Henry, T. L., & Perkins-Brown, J. (2011). The chicken soup effect: The role of recreation and intramural participation in boosting freshman grade point average. Economics of Education Review, 30(2), 247–257.
  • Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and achievement: Developmental perspective on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 124-136.
  • Huang, F. L. (2010). The role of socioeconomic status and school quality in the Philippines: revisiting the Heyneman–Loxley effect. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(3), 288–296.
  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self‐ competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509-527.
  • Jansen, E. P. W. A., & Suhre, C. J. M. (2010). The effect of secondary school study skills preparation on firstyear university achievement. Educational Studies, 36(5), 569–580. Karasar, N. (2003). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (9. bs.) [The scientific research method (9th ed.)]. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  • Kaya, E., Bal, D. A., Sezek, F. & Akın, M. (2005). Sınıf ortamı ve barınma sorunlarından kaynaklanan olumsuzlukların öğrenci başarısı üzerine etkisi [The effects of negativities from class circumstances and residence to student’s success]. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(2), 41-51.
  • Koçbeker, D. V. (2007). Alâeddin Keykubat yerleşkesinde yurtlarda barınan öğrencilerin sorunlarının eğitimlerindeki başarı düzeylerine etkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi) [The effect of the problems of students staying in the dormitories at Alaaddin Keykubat Campus on their educational achievement levels (Unpublished master’s thesis)]. Selçuk University, Konya.
  • Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., Newton, F. B., Kim, E., & Wilcox, D. (2013). Psychosocial factors predicting first-year college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 54(3), 247–266.
  • Lau, K. L. & Chan, D.W. (2001). Motivational characteristics of under-achievers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 21(4), 417-430.
  • Lee, V.E., Zuze, T.L., & Ross, K.N. (2005). School effectiveness in 14 Sub-Saharan African countries: Links with 6th graders’ reading achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(2–3), 207–246.
  • Liu, W. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2005). Academic self-concept: A Cross-Sectional study of grade and gender differences in a Singapore secondary school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 20-27.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295.
  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Koller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163.
  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). The big-fish-little-pond effect: persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal 44(3),631-669.
  • Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O'Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish–little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319−350.
  • Marsh, H. W., Xu, M., & Martin, A. J. (2012). Self-concept: A synergy of theory, method, and application. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (Vol. 1, pp. 427–458). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
  • Marshall, H. H. (1989). The development of self-concept. Young Children, 44(5), 44-51.
  • Martorell, P., Stange, K., and McFarlin Jr, I. (2016). Investing in schools: capital spending, facility conditions, and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 140, 13-29.
  • Matthews, J. S., Morrison, F. J., & Ponitz, C. C. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 689–704.
  • Mayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Seifert, T. A. D., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., et al. (2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Memduhoğlu, H. B., & Tanhan, F. (2013). Üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik başarılarını etkileyen örgütsel faktörler ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Study of organisational factors scale’s validity and reliability affecting university students’ academic achievements]. Van Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Education, 10(1), 106-124.
  • Mihaela, P. L. (2015). Psychological factors of academic success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1632-1637.
  • Newfield, J. & Virginia B. M. (1983). Achievement and attitudinal differences among students in regular, remedial and advanced classes. The Journal of Experimental Education. 52(1), 45-56.
  • Nunez, A. M. (2008). Organizational effects on first-year students' academic outcomes at a new public research university. Journal of College Student Retention, 10(4), 525–541.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2008). Education at a glance 2008: OECD indicators. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Öner, U. (1987). Benlik gelişimine ilişkin kuramlar [Theories of the development of self]. In B. Onur, Ergenlik Psikolojisi. Ankara: Hacettepe Taş Kitapçılık.
  • Pinxten, M., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., & D’Haenens, E. (2010). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Effects of type of achievement measure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 689–709.
  • Reynolds, A. L., & Weigand, M. J. (2010). The relationships among academic attitudes, psychological attitudes, and the first-semester academic achievement of first-year college students. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 47(2), 175–195.
  • Rice, L., Barth, J. M., Guadagno, R. E., Smith, G. P. A., McCallum, D. M., & ASERT (2013). The role of social support in students' perceived abilities and attitudes toward math and science. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1028–1040.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1986). Conceiving the self. Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.
  • Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., and Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 403–419. doi: 10.1037/a0013838
  • Shaterloo, A., & Mohammadyari, G. (2011). Students counselling and academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 625-628.
  • Shi, M. (2019). The effects of class size and instructional technology on student learning performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 130-138.
  • Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22–32.
  • Soria, K. M., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2013). Library use and undergraduate student outcomes: New evidence for students' retention and academic success. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(2), 147–164.
  • Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2008). Sex differences in school achievement: What are the roles of personality and achievement motivation? European Journal of Personality, 22, 185–209.
  • Torenbeek, M., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2010). The effect of the fit between secondary and university education on first-year student achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 659–675.
  • Valentine, J. C., & Dubois, D. L. (2005). “Effects of self-beliefs on academic achievement and vice versa. Separating the chicken from the egg,” in International Advances in self Research: New Frontiers for Self Research. Vol. 2, eds H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, and D. M. McInerney (Greenwich, CT: Information Age), 53–78.
  • Véronneau, M.-H., & Dishion, T. J. (2011). Middle school friendships and academic achievement in early adolescence: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 99–124.
  • Voyer, D., & Voyer, S.D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1174–1204.
  • Yazedjian, A., Toews, M. L., & Navarro, A. (2009). Exploring parental factors, adjustment, and academic achievement among white and hispanic college students. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 458–467.
  • van der Zanden, P. J., Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H., & Meijer, P. C. (2018). Domains and predictors of firstyear student success: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 23, 57–77.
  • Wall, C. (1986). Self-concept: An element of success in the female library manager. Journal of Library Administration, 6(4), 53-65.
  • Wang, Y., Tian, L., & Huebner, E. S. (2019). Basic psychological needs satisfaction at school, behavioral school engagement, and academic achievement: Longitudinal reciprocal relations among elementary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 130-139.
  • Wigfield, A., & Karpathian, M. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children's self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 233–261.
  • Wolff, F., Nagy, N., Helm, F., & Möller, J. (2018). Testing the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept with open self-concept reports. Learning and Instruction, 55, 58-66.
  • Zhou, Y.-X., Ou, C.-Q., Zhao, Z.-T., Wan, C.-S., Guo, C., Li, L., et al. (2015). The impact of self-concept and college involvement on the first-year success of medical students in China. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(1), 163–179.