___

• Açıkalın, Sezgin; Erdoğan Levent(2004), ”Veblen’ci Gösteriş Amaçlı Tüketim”, Selçuk Üni. İibf Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Sayı:7, Konya:1-18
• Argyrous, H. George (1996), “Cumulative Causation And Industrial Evolution: Kaldor's Four Stages Of Industrialization As An Evolutionary Model”, Journal Of Economic Issues, Vol. 30, No. 1:97-120.
• Bagwell, Laurie Simon; Bernheim B. Douglas (1996), “Veblen Effects In A Theory Of Conspicuous Consumption”, The American Economic Review; 86, 3;Abı/Inform Global Sf. 373- 349.
• Başdinar, Gülenay (2011), “Kapitalizmin İstikrarsızlığı: Veblen, Keynes Ve Minsky”,Doktora Tezi,Hacettepe Üniversitesi S.B.E.İ., Ankara:14-19
• Başdinar, Gülenay (2013), “Kurum, İçgüdü Ve Alışkanlık Kavramları Temelinde Veblen’in Kurumsal Evrim”,Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt 46, Sayı 4, Ankara:45-65
• Coast, Alfred William Bob (1954). The Influence Of Veblen‟S Methodology. The Journal Of Political Economy, 62 (6):529-537
• Çelik, Nuriye(2013), “Thorstein Veblen’in Gösterişçi Tüketim Yaklaşımı: Niğde Üniversitesi İdari Personeli Örneği”,Niğde Üniversitesi F.E.F. Sosyoloji Bölümü, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı:34 Yıl: 2013/1 (171-203 S.)
• Davıs, Arthur K. (1945). “Sociological Elements İn Veblen‟S Economic Theory”,The Journal Of Political Economy, 53 (2):132-149.
• Dorfman, Joseph (1934/1972), Thorstein Veblen And His America, Clifton, Nj:Augustus M. Kelley: 23,33
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1998), “The Approach Of Institutional Economics”, Journal Of Economic Literature, Vol. 37, No: 1: 176.
• Jorgensen, Elizabeth W.;Henry I.(1999), “Thorstein Veblen, Victorian Firebrand”, M. E. Sharpe Press, New York
• Kızılkaya, Ertuğrul İbrahim(2001), “İstanbul, Thorstein B. Veblen'in İktisat Düşüncesi: Kapitalizmin Ruhuna Farklı Bir Bakış”Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi S.B.E.
• Kızılkaya, Ertuğrul İbrahim(2003), “Thorstein B. Veblen’in İktisat Düşüncesinde Metafizik Değer Yargılarının İzleri”, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2: 89-100.
• Larson, Jonathan; Samuels, Warren J. (1995), “A Restoration Of Significance; Reflections On The Intellectual Context And Significance Of Thorstein Veblen”, Journal Of Economic Issues, Vol.29, No.3:915-922.
• Mehille J. Herskovits (1936), “The Significance Of Thorstein Veblen For Anthropology”, American Anthropologist, Vol. 38: 351-353
• Rıesman, David (1952), "A Lecture On Veblen", Journal Of General Education, Vol. 6: 217
• Rutherford, Malcolm (1995). The Old And The New Institutionalism: Can Bridge Be Built?, Journal Of Economic Issues, 29 (2):443-451.
• Stabile, Donald (1997), “The Intellectual Antecedents Of Thorstein Veblen: A Case For John Bates Clark”, Journal Of Economic Issues, Vol.31,No.3:817-826
• Stahl – Rolf,Silke R. (2000), “Descendance And Social Genealogies: Toward An Evolutionary Conception Of Economic History”, Journal Of Economic Issues,Vol. 34, No. 4: 891-909
• Tilman, Rick (1992), “Thorstein Veblen And His Critics, 1891-1963 Conservative, Liberal And Radical Perspectives”, Princeton University Press, New Jersey: 14.
• Tilman, Rick (1992), “Thorstein Veblen And Western Thought Fin De Siecle: A Recent Interpretation” Journal Of Economic Issues, 36, (1): 107-129.
• Veblen, Thorstein Bunde (1957), Monthly Review,Vol. 9: 65-75.
• Veblen, Thorstein (2005), “Aylak Sınıfın Teorisi”, Babil Yayınları, Birinci Basım, İstanbul:19
• Veblen, Thorstein Bunde (1973) (1899). “The Theory Of Leisure Class”, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston: 133, 388-390
• Veblen, Thorstein Bunde (1990) (1919). “The Place Of Science In Modern Civilization”,Transaction Publishers, London: 242-243
• Veblen, Thorstein Bunde (1998) (1898),“Why İs Economics Not An Evolutionary Science?”,Cambridge Journal Of Economics, 22: 403-414.