The Impact of Translational Neuroscience on Revisiting Psychiatric Diagnosis: State of the Art and Conceptual Analysis
The Impact of Translational Neuroscience on Revisiting Psychiatric Diagnosis: State of the Art and Conceptual Analysis
___
- 1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
- 2. Maj M. DSM-IV: some critical remarks. In: Kendler KS, Parnas J, editors. Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry II: Nosology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012:161-4.
- 3. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.4. Aragona M. Aspettando la rivoluzione. Oltre il DSM-V: Le nuove idee sulla diagnosi tra filosofia della scienza e psicopatologia [Waiting for the revolution. Beyond the DSM-V: the new ideas about the diagnosis, between philosophy of science and psychopathology]. Rome: Editori Riuniti; 2006.
- 5. Aragona M. The role of comorbidity in the crisis of the current psychiatric classification system. PP&P 2009;16:1-11.
- 6. Murphy D. Psychiatry in the Scientific Image. Cambridge: MIT press; 2006.
- 7. Sirgiovanni E. The mechanistic approach to psychiatric classification. Dial Phil Ment Neuro Sci 2009;2:45-9.
- 8. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS, Quinn K, et al. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2010;167:748-51.
- 9. Frances A. RDoC is necessary, but very oversold. World Psychiatry 2014;13:47-9.
- 10. Peterson BS. Editorial: Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): a new psychiatric nosology whose time has not yet come. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2015;56:719-22.
- 11. Lilienfeld SO, Treadway MT. Clashing Diagnostic Approaches: DSM-ICD Versus RDoC. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2016;12:435-63.
- 12. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 2008;299:211-3.
- 13. Mitchell P. From concept to classroom. What is translational research? Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research; 2016.
- 14. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research -“blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403-6.
- 15. Cofiel L, Bassi DU, Ray RK, Pietrobon R, Brentani H. Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries. PLoS One 2013;8:e75167.
- 16. Yu JS, Xue AY, Redei EE, Bagheri N. A support vector machine model provides an accurate transcript-level-based diagnostic for major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry 2016;6:e931.
- 17. Kaufman J, Gelernter J, Hudziak JJ, Tyrka AR, Coplan JD. The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project and studies of risk and resilience in maltreated children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015;54:617-25.
- 18. Kato TA, Watabe M, Kanba S. Neuron-glia interaction as a possible glue to translate the mind-brain gap: a novel multi-dimensional approach toward psychology and psychiatry. Front Psychiatry 2013;4:139.
- 19. Takahashi H, Hashimoto R, Iwase M, Ishii R, Kamio Y, Takeda M. Prepulse inhibition of startle response: recent advances in human studies of psychiatric disease. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2011;9:102-10.
- 20. Alamian G, Hincapié AS, Pascarella A, Thiery T, Combrisson E, Saive AL, et al. Measuring alterations in oscillatory brain networks in schizophrenia with resting-state MEG: State-of-the-art and methodological challenges. Clin Neurophysiol 2017;128:1719-36.
- 21. Laks J, Engelhardt E. Peculiarities of geriatric psychiatry: a focus on aging and depression. CNS Neurosci Ther 2010;16:374-9.
- 22. Smith GS, Gunning-Dixon FM, Lotrich FE, Taylor WD, Evans JD. Translational research in late-life mood disorders: implications for future intervention and prevention research. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007;32:1857-75.
- 23. Sharp C, Monterosso J, Montague PR. Neuroeconomics: a bridge for translational research. Biol Psychiatry 2012;72:87-92.
- 24. Khalsa SS, Lapidus RC. Can interoception improve the pragmatic search for biomarkers in psychiatry? Front Psychiatry 2016;7:121.
- 25. First MB. The National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project: moving towards a neuroscience-based diagnostic classification in psychiatry. In: Kendler KS, Parnas J, editors. Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry II: Nosology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012:12-8.
- 26. Aragona M. Epistemological reflections about the crisis of the DSM-5 and the revolutionary potential of the RDoC project. Dial Phil Ment Neuro Sci 2014;7:11-20.
- 27. Stoyanov DS. The method to identify mind’s brain: commentary on Korf (2017). Dial Phil Ment Neuro Sci 2017;10:35-6.
- 28. Stoyanov DS. The Cross-Validation in the dialogue of mental and neuroscience. Dial Phil Ment Neuro Sci 2009;2:24-8.
- 29. Stoyanov DS. Why a logical-pragmatic perspective on validity in mental health is not sufficient: introduction to the principle of convergent transdisciplinary cross-validity. Dial Phil Ment Neuro Sci 2010;3:25-6.
- 30. Stoyanov DS, Kandilarova S, Sirakov N, Stoeva M, Velkova KG, Kostianev SS. Towards translational cross-validation of clinical psychological tests and FMRI: experimental implementation. Compt Rend Acad Bulg Sci 2017;70:879-84.
- 31. Zachar P, Jablensky A. Introduction: The concept of validation in psychiatry and psychology. In: Zachar P, Stoyanov DS, Aragona M, Jablensky A, editors. Alternative perspectives on psychiatric validation. DSM, ICD, RDoC, and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015:3-24.
- 32. Aragona M. About and beyond comorbidity: does the crisis of the DSM bring on a radical rethinking of descriptive psychopathology? PP&P 2009;16:29-33.
- 33. Aragona M. Rethinking received views on the history of psychiatric nosology: Minor shifts, major continuities. In: Zachar P, Stoyanov DS, Aragona M, Jablensky A, editors. Alternative perspectives on psychiatric validation. DSM, ICD, RDoC, and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015:27-46.
- 34. Telles Correia D. The concept of validity throughout the history of psychiatry. J Eval Clin Pract 2017;23:994-8.
- 35. Marková IS, Berrios GE. Neuroimaging in psychiatry: epistemological considerations. In: Zachar P, Stoyanov DS, Aragona M, Jablensky A, editors. Alternative perspectives on psychiatric validation. DSM, ICD, RDoC, and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015:112-27.
- 36. Berrios GE. Formation and meaning of mental symptoms: history and epistemology. Dial Phil Ment Neuro Sci 2013;6:39-48.
- 37. Aragona M, Marková IS. The hermeneutics of mental symptoms in the Cambridge School. Rev Latinoam Psicopatol Fundam 2015;18:599-618.