PROTETİK DİŞ TEDAVİSİNDE TİTANYUM ALERJİSİ
ÖZ
Günümüzde diş eksikliğinin tedavisinde en güncel ve biyomimetrik tedavi seçeneklerinden biri implant tedavisidir. Çoğu zaman bu tür tedavilerin başarı oranları çok yüksektir. Diş hekimliğinde kullanılan implantlar titanyum veya titanyum ve diğer alaşımlarının kombinasyonlarından üretilmektedir. Ağız boşluğundan titanyum biyoinert malzeme olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bundan dolayı vücut herhangi bir yabancı cisim reaksiyonunu göstermeden implantları “kabul etmektedir”. Lakin bu konu son zamanlar hastaların titanyuma karşı alerji göstermelerinden kaynaklı tartışma konusu olmuştur. Araştırmacılar son zamanlarda herhangi bir biyolojik ve teknik komplikasyon nedeni olmayan implant kayıplarının titanyuma karşı alerjiden kaynaklandığından şüphe etmektedirler. Bu derlemenin amacı diş hekimliğinde kullanılan titanyuma karşı alerji vakalarını incelemektir.
TITANIUM ALLERGY IN PROSTHODONTICS
Today, implant therapy is one of the most
current and biomimetric treatment options in
the treatment of tooth deficiency. Often, the
success rates of such treatments are very high.
The implants used in dentistry are manufactured
from titanium or a combination of titanium and
other alloys. Titanium from the oral cavity is
considered as bioinert material. Therefore, the
body accepts implants without showing any
foreign body reactions. However, this issue has
recently been the subject of controversy due
to patients’ allergies to titanium. Researchers
have recently suspected implant losses that
do not cause any biological and technical
complications as they are caused by allergies to
titanium. The aim of this review is to investigate
allergy cases against titanium used in dentistry.
___
- 1. Council, N.R., Biologic markers in
immunotoxicology. 1992: National
Academies Press.
- 2. Mösges, R., The increasing prevalence
of allergy: a challenge for the physician.
Clinical & Experimental Allergy Reviews,
2002. 2(1): p. 13-17.
- 3. Muller, K. and E. Valentine-Thon,
Hypersensitivity to titanium: clinical and
laboratory evidence. Neuroendocrinology
Letters, 2006. 27(1): p. 31-35.
- 4. Frisken, K., et al., A study of titanium
release into body organs following the
insertion of single threaded screw implants
into the mandibles of sheep. Australian
dental journal, 2002. 47(3): p. 214-217.
- 5. Okamura, T., A skin patch test for the diagnosis of titanium allergy. J Dent res,
1999. 78: p. 1135.
- 6. Thomas, P., et al., Hypersensitivity to
titanium osteosynthesis with impaired
fracture healing, eczema, and T-cell
hyperresponsiveness in vitro: case report
and review of the literature. Contact
Dermatitis, 2006. 55(4): p. 199-202.
- 7. Siddiqi, A., et al., Titanium allergy: could
it affect dental implant integration? Clinical
Oral Implants Research, 2011. 22(7): p.
673-680.
- 8. Delves, P.J., et al., Essential immunology.
2017: John Wiley & Sons.
- 9. Hallab, N., K. Merritt, and J.J. Jacobs, Metal
sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic
implants. JBJS, 2001. 83(3): p. 428-436.
- 10. Venugopal, B. and T.D. Luckey, Metal
toxicity in mammals. Volume 2. Chemical
toxicity of metals and metalloids. 1978:
Plenum Press.
- 11. Forte, G., F. Petrucci, and B. Bocca,
Metal allergens of growing significance:
epidemiology, immunotoxicology, strategies
for testing and prevention. Inflammation &
Allergy-Drug Targets (Formerly Current
Drug Targets-Inflammation & Allergy),
2008. 7(3): p. 145-162.
- 12. Smith, D.C., et al., Systemic metal ion levels
in dental implant patients. International
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants,
1997. 12(6).
- 13. Sykaras, N., et al., Implant materials,
designs, and surface topographies: their
effect on osseointegration. A literature
review. International Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Implants, 2000. 15(5).
- 14. Nakagawa, M., S. Matsuya, and K. Udoh,
Corrosion behavior of pure titanium and
titanium alloys in fluoride-containing
solutions. Dental materials journal, 2001.
20(4): p. 305-314.
- 15. Holgers, K., et al., Clinical, immunological
and bacteriological evaluation of adverse
reactions to skin-penetrating titanium
implants in the head and neck region.
Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 27(1): p. 1-7.
- 16. Kruger, J., Fundamental aspects of the
corrosion of metallic implants, in Corrosion
and degradation of implant materials. 1979,
ASTM International.
- 17. Kamachimudali, U., T. Sridhar, and B. Raj,
Corrosion of bio implants. Sadhana, 2003.
28(3-4): p. 601-637.
- 18. RAVNHOLT, G., Corrosion current and
pH rise around titanium coupled to dental
alloys. European Journal of Oral Sciences,
1988. 96(5): p. 466-472.
- 19. Cadosch, D., et al., Metal is not inert: role
of metal ions released by biocorrosion
in aseptic loosening—current concepts.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Part A: An Official Journal of The Society
for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for
Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for
Biomaterials, 2009. 91(4): p. 1252-1262.
- 20. Okazaki, Y., et al., Comparison of metal
concentrations in rat tibia tissues with
various metallic implants. Biomaterials,
2004. 25(28): p. 5913-5920.
- 21. Urban, R.M., et al., Dissemination of wear
particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal
lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee
replacement. JBJS, 2000. 82(4): p. 457-
477.
- 22. Merritt, K. and S.A. Brown, Distribution
of cobalt chromium wear and corrosion
products and biologic reactions. Clinical
Orthopaedics and Related Research®,
1996. 329: p. S233-S243.
- 23. Merritt, K. and J.J. Rodrigo, Immune
response to synthetic materials: sensitization
of patients receiving orthopaedic implants.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related
Research®, 1996. 326: p. 71-79.
- 24. Büdinger, L., M. Hertl, and L.
Büdinger, Immunologic mechanisms in
hypersensitivity reactions to metal ions: an
overview. Allergy, 2000. 55(2): p. 108-115.
- 25. Frigerio, E., et al., Metal sensitivity in
patients with orthopaedic implants: a
prospective study. Contact Dermatitis,
2011. 64(5): p. 273-279.
- 26. Nasser, S., Orthopedic metal immune
hypersensitivity. Orthopedics, 2007. 30(8):
p. 89.
- 27. Koch, P., Kontaktallergien bei
Metallarbeitern: Berufliche und
allergologische Relevanz der
Epikutantestung bei 17 Patienten.
Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt, 1996.
44(2): p. 62-67.
- 28. Abdallah, H.I., R.K. Balsara, and A.C.
O’Riordan, Pacemaker contact sensitivity:
clinical recognition and management. The
Annals of thoracic surgery, 1994. 57(4): p.
1017-1018.
- 29. Lalor, P., et al., Sensitivity to titanium. A
cause of implant failure? The Journal of
bone and joint surgery. British volume,
1991. 73(1): p. 25-28.
- 30. Peters, M.S., et al., Pacemaker contact
sensitivity. Contact dermatitis, 1984. 11(4):
p. 214-218.
- 31. Halpern, B. and N. Amache, Diagnosis of
drug allergy in vitro with the lymphocyte
transformation test. Journal of Allergy,
1967. 40(3): p. 168-181.
- 32. Müller, K.E., Zwei Episoden eines Guillain-
Barré-Syndrom (GBS) nach Roxithromycin
und Mercurius solubilis. Umwelt Medizin
Gesell, 2003. 16: p. 101-102.
- 33. Stejskal, V.D., M. Forsbeck, and R.
Nilsson, Lymphocyte transformation test
for diagnosis of isothiazolinone allergy in
man. Journal of investigative dermatology,
1990. 94(6): p. 798-802.
- 34. Warrington, R. and K. Tse, Lymphocyte
transformation studies in drug
hypersensitivity. Canadian Medical
- 35. Carroll, K.G. and J.L. TULLIS,
Observations on the presence of titanium
and zinc in human leucocytes. Nature,
1968. 217(5134): p. 1172.
- 36. Du Preez, L., K.-W. Butow, and T.J.
Swart, Implant failure due to titanium
hypersensitivity/allergy?-Report of a case:
implantology corner. South African Dental
Journal, 2007. 62(1): p. 22-25.
- 37. Weingart, D., et al., Titanium deposition
in regional lymph nodes after insertion of
titanium screw implants in maxillofacial
region. International journal of oral and
maxillofacial surgery, 1994. 23(6): p. 450-
452.
- 38. Mitchell, D.L., S.A. Synnott, and J.A.
VanDercreek, Tissue reaction involving
an intraoral skin graft and CP titanium
abutments: a clinical report. International
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants,
1990. 5(1).