Adil GÜNER, Ayşe Mine ÖZKAN GENÇLER, Berrin AKYILDIRIM, Burçin ÇINGAY, Gül Nilhan TUĞ, M Fatih ALKAYIŞ, Mehtap ÖZTEKİN, Salih Sercan KANOĞLU

12749

Orhan Sevgi ve Ünal Akkemik'in ““Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler)” Adlı Eserin Bilgi Kaynağı ve Terim Yaklaşımı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme” (Avrasya Terim Dergisi 2(1): 50-67, 2014) adlı makalesi üzerine

PDF

___

  • Adams; C.C., 1935. The Relation of General Ecology to Human Ecology. Ecology, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 316- 335.
  • Allaby, M., 1998. A Dictionary of Ecology. Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-280078-7.
  • Berkes, F., 2008. Sacred ecology. Taylor & Francis published 2nd ed., 313 pages.
  • Borrett, S.R., Moody, J. and Edelmann, A., 2014. The rise of Network Ecology: Maps of the topic diversityand scientific collaboration. Ecological Modelling: Brewer, R., 1988. The Science of Ecology. Saunders College Publishing, page 921.
  • Carmel, Y., Kent, R., Bar-Massada, A., Blank, L., Liberzon, J., Nezer, O., Sapir; G., and Federman, R., 2013. Trends in Ecological Research during the Last Three Decades – A Systematic Review. PLoS One 8(4): e59813. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0059813.
  • Carpenter, J. R.1936. Concepts and Criteria for the Recognition of Communities. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 285-289.
  • Clements, F. E. 1936. Nature and Structure of the Climax. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 252- 284.
  • Dauvin, J.C,, Bellan, G. and Bellan-Santini, D., 2008. The need for clear and comparable terminology in benthic ecology. Part I. Ecological concepts. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 18: 432–445.
  • Dodson, S.I., 1998. What is Ecology. Ecology Edit by Stanley I. Dodson, pages: 1-25, ISBN: 0 - 19 - 512079-5, Oxford University Press.
  • Du-ning, X. and Xiu-zhen, L., 1999. Core Concepts of Landscape Ecology. Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol. 11, No 2, pp: 131 - 135.
  • Egerton, F. N., 2001. A History of the Ecological Sciences: Early Greek Origins. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, January, 93 - 97.
  • Ghilarov, A., 1998. Lamarck and prehistory of ecology. Internatiol Microbiology, 1: 161 - 164.
  • Gleason, H.A., 1927. Further Views on the SuccessionConcept. Ecology, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Jul., 1927), pp. 299-326.
  • Golley, F.B., 1993. A History of The Ecosystem Concept in Ecology. Yale University Press, ISBN: 0 - 300 - 05546 - 3, 254 pages.
  • Graham, M.H. and Dayton, P.K. 2002. On the Evolution of Ecological ideas: Paradigms and Scientific progress. Ecology, 83(6): pp. 1481-1489.
  • Griffith, T., 1934. The ecological basis of anthropology. Ecology 15: 223-242.
  • Inouye, D.W., 1980. The Terminology of Floral Larceny. David W. Ecology, Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 1251-1253.
  • Hansen, A.A., 1921: The Terminology of the Ultimate Vegetation. Ecology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 125-126.
  • Harshberger, J. W., 1923: Hemerecology: The Ecology of Cultivated Fields, Parks, and Gardens. Ecology, Vol. 4, No. 3 (Jul., 1923), pp. 297-306.
  • Hodges, K. E., 2008: Defining the problem: terminology and progress in ecology. Front Ecol Environ, 6(1): 35–42.
  • Hustich, I. 1979. Ecological concepts and biogeographical zonation in the North: the need for a generally accepted terminology. - Holarct. Ecol. 2: 208-217.
  • Hutchings, M.J., Gibson, D.J., Bardgett, R. D., Ree, M., Newton, E., Baier, A. and Sandhu, L., 2012: Tansley’s vision for Journal of Ecology, and a Centenary Celebration. Journal of Ecology 2012, 100, 1–5.
  • Jax, K., 2007: Can We Define Ecosystems? On the Confusion Between Definition and Description of Ecological Concepts. Acta Biotheor 55: 341–355.
  • Kinsley, D., 1995. Ecology and Religion: Ecological Spiritually in Cross-cultural Perspective. ISBN: 0 - 13 - 138512 - 7, 248 pages.
  • Krebs, C.J., 2006. Ecology after 100 years: Progress and pseudo-progress. New Zealand Journal of Ecology , 30(1): 3-11.
  • Klugh, A.B., 1923. A Common System of Classification in Plant and Animal Ecology. Ecology, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 366-377.
  • Kozlovsky, D. G., 1968. A Critical Evaluation of the Trophic Level Concept. I. Ecological Efficiencies. Ecology, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 48-60.
  • Legendre, P. and L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical ecology. Elsevier Press, Developments in Environmental Modeling 20. p. 851.
  • Magurran, A.E., 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press. p. 179
  • Magurran, A.E., 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing Company. p. 257
  • Magnusson WE, 2013. The words “population” and “community” have outlived their usefulness in ecological publications. Natureza e Conservação, 11(1):1-8.
  • Mason, H.L. and Langenheim, J.H., 1957. Language Analysis and the Concept "Environment". Ecology, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 325-340.
  • Mason, H.L. and Langenhem, J.H., 1961. Nautral Selection as an Ecological Concept. Ecology, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 158-165.
  • McMillan, C., 1959. The Concept Vegetation and the Comfortable Ecologist. Ecology, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 488-490.
  • Moore, B., 1920. The Scope of Ecology. Ecology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3-5.
  • Nobis, M. and Wohlgemuth, T., 2004. Trend words in ecological core journals over the last 25 years (1978_/2002). Oikos, 106 (2): 411-421.
  • Pautasso, M., 2014. The jump in network ecology research between 1990 and 1991 is a Web of Science artefact. Letter to the Editor, Ecological Modelling 286 (2014) 11–12.
  • Pautasso, M., 2013a. Fungal under-representation is (slowly) diminishing in the life sciences. Fungal Ecology, 6 (1); 129 - 135.
  • Pautasso, M., 2013b. Fungal under-representation is (indeed) diminishing in the life sciences. Fungal Ecology, 6, (5): 460-463.
  • Pautasso, M., 2012. Publication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability. Sustainability 2012, 4, 3234-3247.
  • Phillips, J., 1935a. Succession, Development, the Climax, and the Complex Organism: An Analysis of Concepts. Part I. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 554-571.
  • Phillips, J., 1935b. Succession, Development, the Climax, and the Complex Organism: An Analysis of Concepts: Part II. Development and the Climax. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 210- 246.
  • Phillips, J., 1935c. Succession, Development, the Climax, and the Complex Organism: An Analysis of Concepts: Part III. The Complex Organism: Conclusions. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 488-508.
  • Prado, P. I., and El-Hani, C.N., 2013. Blaming The Words “Population” and “Community” Has Outlived Its Usefulness in Ecology - a Reply to Magnusson (2013). Natureza & Conservação 11(1):99-102. .
  • Ricklefs, R. E., 1993. The Economy of Nature: A Textbook in Basic Ecology. Third edit., W.H. Freeman - New York, ISBN: 0 - 7167 - 2409 - X, 576 pages.
  • Rowe, J. S., 1961. The Level-of-Integration Concept and Ecology. Ecology, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 420-427.
  • Rykiel, E. J., Jr. 1985. Towards a definition of ecological disturbance. Aust. J. Ecol. 10:361~5.
  • Schultz, J., 2005. The Ecozones of theWorld. SpringerVerlag Berlin Heidelberg, Translated into English by Bridget Ahnert, 252 pages.
  • Shantz, H. L. 1945. Frederic Edward Clements (1874- 1945). Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 317-319.
  • Shelford, V. E., 1926. Terms and Concepts in Animal Ecology. Ecology, Vol. 7, No. 3 (Jul., 1926), p. 389.
  • Spurr, S. H.,1952. Origin of the Concept of Forest Succession. Ecology, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 426-427.
  • Sutherland, W.J., Freckleton, R.P., Godfray, H.C.J., Beissinger, S.R., Benton, T., Cameron, D.D., Carmel, Y., Coomes, D.A., Coulson, T., Emmerson, M.C., Hails, R.S., Hays, C.G., Hodgson, D.J., Hutchings, M.J., Johnson, D., Jones, J.P.G., Keeling, M.J., Kokko, H., Kunin, W.E., Lambin, X., Lewis3, O.T., Malhi, Y., Mieszkowska, N., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Norris, K., Phillimore, A.B., Purves, D.W., Reid,J.M., Reuman, D.C., Thompson, K., Travis, J.M.J., Turnbull, L. A., Wardle, D.A. and Wiegand, T., 2013. The Identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Ecology, 101: 58–67
  • Tansley, A.G. 1913. The Aims of the New Journal. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-3.
  • Tansley, A. G. 1935. The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 284-307.
  • Tansley, A. G. 1947. Obituary Notice: Frederic Edward Clements, 1874--1945. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 194-196.
  • Thoday, D. 1933. The Terminology of "Xerophytism". Journal of Ecology, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1-6.
  • Udvardy, M.F.D., 1959. Notes on the Ecological Concepts of Habitat, Biotope and Niche. Ecology, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 725-728.
  • Yapp, R. H. 1922. The Concept of Habitat. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-17.
  • Wardle, D.A., 2010. Do ‘Faculty of 1000’ (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 3: 11-15.
  • Wheeler, B. D. and Proctor, M. C. F., 2000. Ecological Gradients, Subdivisions and Terminology of North-West European Mires. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 187-203.
  • Wilkinson, D.M., 2002. Ecology before ecology: biogeography and ecology in Lyell's 'Principler'. Journal of Biogeography, 29: 1109 - 1115.
  • http://apps.webofknowledge.com Erişim Tarihi: 07.08.2014
  • http://www.esajournals.org/ Erişim Tarihi: 07.08.2014
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com Erişim Tarihi: 07.08.2014 ip-science.thomsonreuters.com Erişim Tarihi: 07.07.2014
Avrasya Terim Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-7507
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Orhan Sevgi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Orhan Sevgi ve Ünal Akkemik'in ““Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler)” Adlı Eserin Bilgi Kaynağı ve Terim Yaklaşımı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme” (Avrasya Terim Dergisi 2(1): 50-67, 2014) adlı makalesi üzerine

Adil GÜNER, Ayşe Mine ÖZKAN GENÇLER, Berrin AKYILDIRIM, Burçin ÇINGAY, Gül Nilhan TUĞ, M Fatih ALKAYIŞ, Mehtap ÖZTEKİN, Salih Sercan KANOĞLU

Türkçede Tıp Terimleri ile Kurulmuş Deyimler

Feyza TOKAT

"Orhan Sevgi ve Ünal Akkemik’in “Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler)” Adlı Eserin Bilgi Kaynağı ve Terim Yaklaşımı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme” (ATD 2(1): 50-67, 2014) Adlı Makaleye İlişkin Prof. Dr. Adil Güner’in Editöre Mektuba Yazarların Yanıtı

Orhan SEVGİ, Ünal AKKEMİK

İLK ÇİN YILLIKLARINDA GEÇEN DOĞU TÜRKİSTAN TARİHİNE DÂİR BAZI HUSUSÎ TERİMLER I

KÜRŞAT YILDIRIM

Editöre Mektup; Orhan Sevgi ve Ünal Akkemik’in ““Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler)” Adlı Eserin Bilgi Kaynağı ve Terim Yaklaşımı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme” (Avrasya Terim Dergisi 2(1): 50-67, 2014) Adlı Makalesi Üzerine

Adil GÜNER, Ayşe Mine GENÇLER ÖZKAN, Berrin AKYILDIRIM, Burçin ÇINGAY, Gül Nilhan TUĞ, M. Fatih ALKAYIŞ, Mehtap ÖZTEKİN, Salih Sercan KANOĞLU

EKOLOJİ YAYINLARININ BAŞLIKLARINDA KULLANILAN TERİMLERİN BELİRLENMESİ VE ZAMANA GÖRE DEĞİŞİMLERİNİN ANALİZİ

ORHAN SEVGİ

ÇATI BAHÇESİ KAVRAMI VE TERİM KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

MERT EKŞİ

Dördüncü sayıyla merhabalar

Orhan SEVGİ

Çatı Bahçesi Kavramı ve Terim Kullanımı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Mert EKŞİ

DETERMINATION OF THE TERMS USED IN THE TITLES OF ECOLOGY PUBLICATIONS AND ANALYSIS OF THEIR TEMPORAL CHANCE

ORHAN SEVGİ