2003 IRAK SAVAŞI SONRASI BASRA KÖRFEZİ’NDE ETKİLİ BİR UNSUR OLARAK GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRME SİYASETİ

Bu makalenin temel çıkış noktasını, Basra Körfezi siyasetinde bölge aktörlerinin birbirleriyle karşılıklı etkileşim içinde olduğu ve bu durumun güvenlikleştirme siyasetinin sıklıkla uygulanmasına sebep olduğu iddiası oluşturmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Güvenlik Çalışmalarına alternatif bir bakış açısı sunan Kopenhag Okulu’nun temel argümanlarını kullanmanın mümkün olup olmadığı sorgulanmış, nihai olarak Kopenhag Okulu’nun önemli unsurlarından biri olan Güvenlikleştirme Teorisi üzerinden Basra Körfezi siyaseti incelenmiştir. Makalenin ana amacı, Basra Körfezi siyasetini öğretide sıklıkla kullanılan Realist kuramın dışında farklı bir bakış açısı üzerinden analiz etmenin mümkün olduğunu göstermektir. Zira Basra Körfezi siyaseti, içinde bulunduğu bölgenin dinamiklerine göre şekillenmektedir. Bu noktada bölge ülkelerinin siyaset yapıcıları söylem yoluyla güvenlik ajandalarını belirlemekte, bölge halkları üzerinden güvenliğe ilişkin tehdit algısının oluşmasını sağlamakta ve bu doğrultuda söz konusu güvenlik tehditlerinin toplumlar nezdinde kabul görmesini takiben olağanüstü tedbirler alma yoluna gitmektedirler. Dolayısıyla Basra Körfezi bölgesinde 2003 Irak Savaşı sonrası dönemde yoğun bir şekilde yükselişe geçen askeri güvenlik konusunun dahi aslında başarılı bir güvenlikleştirme siyasetinin parçası olduğu görülmektedir. 2003 Irak Savaşı’nın gerek İran gerek Basra Körfezi Arap ülkeleri açısından oldukça önemli bir dönüm noktası olması sebebiyle dönem olarak 2003 Irak Savaşı sonrası seçilmiştir. Ancak bu makale Irak ağırlıklı bir anlatıma sahip değildir. 2003 Irak işgali, kendisine atfedilmeden bölgedeki pek çok temel mevzuunun tartışılamayacak olması açısından referans olarak kabul edilmiştir. Zira İran-Irak ilişkileri ve de Irak-Basra Körfezi Arap ülkeleri ilişkileri başlı başına ayrı bir çalışma konusu teşkil edecek bir niteliğe sahip olup bu çalışmanın ana çatısının dışında tutulmuştur.

Securitization Policy as an Effective Tool in the Persian Gulf After 2003 Iraqi War

This article seeks to analyze Persian Gulf Politics through an assumption of mutual interaction among the regional actors that leads to the securitization politics in the region. In this article, which initially aims to analyze Persian Gulf policy using an alternative perspective, the main arguments of the Copenhagen School were applied by employing Securitization Theory. This article discusses that politics in the Persian Gulf is shaped by the unique dynamics of the region. At this point, securitization actors in the region use a rhetoric of existential threat and thereby take an issue out of what under those conditions is ‘normal politics’. Once they win the assent of the audience they get the authority to handle the issue to use whatever means they deem most appropriate. Therefore, the concept of military security, which has risen heavily in the aftermath of 2003 Iraqi War, is a result of a successful securitization policy of the regional states. Given the influence of 2003 Iraqi War on the foreign policies of the actors in the Persian Gulf, this article focuses on the post-war period. On the other hand, this article does not predominantly narrate the Iraqi War. The 2003 Iraqi War is assumed to just provide a reference for the comprehension of the regional politics.

___

ALGAR, Hamid, Wahhabism: A Critical Essay, North Haledon, N.J.: Islamic Publications International, 2002.

ASKARI, Hossein, Amin Mohseni and Shahrzad Daneshvar, The Militarization of the Persian Gulf: An EconomicAnalysis, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.

BLAKE, Kristen, The U.S.-Soviet Confrontation in Iran, 1945-1962: A Case in the Annals of the Cold War, Maryland: University Press of America, 2009.

BUSCH, Briton Cooper, Britain and the Persian Gulf, 1894-1914, Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.

BUZAN, Barry, People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, Harlow, Londra: Pearson Longman, 2. B. 1991.

BUZAN, Barry, Morten Kelstrup, Pierre Lemaitre, Elzbieta Tromer, and Ole Weaver, The European Security Order Recast: Scenarios for the Post-Cold War Era, London: Pinter Publishers, 1990.

BUZAN, Barry and Lene Hansen (der.), International Security, London: Sage Publications, 2007.

BUZAN, Barry, Charles Jones, and Richard Little, The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

BUZAN, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.

BUZAN, Barrya and Ole Wæver, Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

COMMINS, David, The Gulf States: A Modern History, London: I.B. Tauris, 2012.

CORDESMAN, Anthony H. and Khalid R. Al Rodhan, Gulf Military Forces in An Era of Asymmetric Wars, Westport: Praegar Security International, 2007.

FÜRTIG, Henner, Iran’s Rivalry with Saudi Arabia between the Gulf Wars, UK: Ithaca Press, 2002.

GAUSE, F. Gregory, Oil Monarchies: Domestic and Scurity Challenges in the Arab Gulf States, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1994.

GUZZINI, Stefan and Dietrich Jung (der.), Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research, London: Routledge Press, 2004.

KAZEMZADEH, Firuz, Russia and Britain in Persia, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1968 .

KUMAR, Ravinder, India and the Persian Gulf Region, 1858-1907, London: Asia Publishing House, 1965.

KURSUN, Zekeriya, Basra Körfezi’nde Osmanlı-İngiliz Çekişmesi: Katar’da Osmanlılar 1871-1916, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay., 2004

LENGOWSKI, George, Russia and The West in Iran 1918-1948, New York: Cornell University Press, 1949.

MACRIS, Jeffrey R., The Politics and Security of the Gulf: Anglo-American Hegemony and the Shaping of a Region, New York: Routledge Press, 2010.

MURDEN, Simon, Emergent Regional Powers and International Relations In The Gulf:1988-1991, UK: Ithaca Press, 1995.

SCHNEIDER, Barry R. (der.), Middle East Security Issues in the Shadow of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation, Alabama: USAF Counterproliferation Center Publications, 1999.

SCOTT, N. and J Jafari, Tourism in the Muslim World, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 2010.

WAEVER, Ole, Security the Speech Act: Analysing the Politics of a Word, Kopenhag: Centre for Peace and Conflict Research, 1989.

WAEVER, Ole, Concepts of Security, Kopenhag: University of Copenhagen Press, 1997.

WILSON, Harold, The Labour Government 1964-1970: A Personal Record, London: Widenfeld& Nicholson, 1971.

WRIGHT, Steven, The United States and Persian Gulf Security: The Foundations of the War on Terror, Reading Berkshire: Ithaca Press, 2007.

BALZACQ, Thiery, “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context”, European Journal of International Relations, vol. XI/2, (June 2005), ss. 171-201.

BALZACQ, Thiery, Sarah Leonard & Jan Ruzicka, Securitization’ revisited: Theory and cases”, International Relations, vol. XXX/4 (2015), ss. 1-38.

BİLGİN, Pınar, “The Politics of Studying Securitization? The Copenhagen School in Turkey”, Security Dialogue, vol. XLII/4-5 (2011), ss. 399-412.

BUZAN, Barry, “Askeri Güvenliğin Değişen Gündemi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, c. V/18 (Yaz 2008), ss.107-123.

CROFT, Stuart, “Does ‘Shifting Securities’ Shift Securitization Theory?”, Ethnopolitics, vol. IX/2 (2010), ss. 259-262.

DAVIDSON, Christopher M., “Dubai and the United Arab Emirates: Security Threats”, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, vol. XXXVI/3 (2009), 431-447.

DOYLE, Michael “Liberalism and World Politics”, American Political Science Review, vol. LXXX/4 (December 1986), ss. 1151-1169.

ERIKSSON, Johan, “Debating the Politics of Security Studies: Response to Goldmann, Waever and Williams”, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. XXXIV/3, (September 1999), 345-352.

HANSEN, Lene “The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. XXIX/2 (June 2000), ss. 285-306.

GAUSE, Gregory, “Saudi Arabia: Iraq, Iran and the Regional Power Balance and the Sectarian Question,” Strategic Insights, vol. VI/2 (February 2007) .

MALMVIG, Helle, “Power, Identity and Securitization in Middle East: Regional Order after the Arab Uprisings”, Mediterranean Politics, vol. XIX/1 (2014), ss. 145-148.

MARSCHALL, Christin, Iran’s Persian Gulf Policy From Khomeini to Khatami (London: Rutledge, 2003).

MCDONALD, Matt “Securitization and the Construction of Security”, European Journal of International Relations, vol. XIV/4 ( 2007), ss. 563-587.

POUR-AHMADI, Hossein & Sajad Mohseni, “The Obama and Securitization of Iran's Nuclear Energy Program”, Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, vol. III/2, (Summer 2012), ss. 143-174

ONEAL, John R. and Bruce Russett, “The Kantian Peace: the Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence and International Organizations, 1885-1992”, World Politics, vol. LII/1 (October 1999), ss. 1-37.

RAMAZANI, R. K., “Iran’s Foreign Policy: Both North and South”, The Middle East Journal, summer 1992, vol. XLVI/3, s. 393.

RATHMELL, Andrew and Kirsten Schulze. "Political Reform in the Gulf: The Case of Qatar" Middle Eastern Studies, vol. XXXVI/4 (October 2000), ss. 47-62.

RUSSELL, James, A. “Environmental Security and Regional Stability in the Persian Gulf”, Middle East Policy, vol. XVI/4 (Winter 2009), ss. 90-101.

SADJADPOUR, Karim “Nuclear Players”, Journal of International Affairs, vol. LX/2 (Spring /Summer 2007), ss.125-134.

SAJJADPOUR, Seyed Kazem and Maedeh Karimi Ghohroudi, “Nuclearization of the Subcontinent and Iran's Security”, Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, vol. III/3 (Fall 2012), ss. 89-114.

SASLEY, Brent E. “ Studying Middle Eastern International Relations through IR Theory”, Ortadoğu Etüdleri, c. II/2 (January 2011), ss. 9-32.

SHAHRAKI, Maryam Javan, “Extreme Securitization: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988)”, Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, vol. III/4 (Winter 2013), ss. 57-74.

SHAYAN, Fatemeh, “Ontological Security Interpration of Iran’s Nuclear Energy Program: A Multidisciplinary Approach”, Journal of Alternative Perspctives in the Social Sciences, vol. III/3, 2011.

STRITZEL, Holger “Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond”, European Journal of International Relations, vol. XIII/3, (September 2007), ss. 357-383.

TETI, Andrea “Bridging the Gap: IR, Middle East Studies and the Disciplinary Politics of the Area Studies Controversy”, European Journal of International Relations, vol. XIII/1 (March 2007), ss. 117-145.

VUORI, Juha A., “Illocutionary Logic and Strands of Securitization: Applying the Theory of Securitization to the Study of Non-Democratic Political Orders”, European Journal of International Relations, vol. XIV/1 (March 2008), ss. 65-99.

WILKINSON, Claire , “The Copenhagen School on Tour in Kyrgyzstan: Is Securitization Theory Useable Outside Europe?”, Security Dialogue, vol. XXXVIII/1 (March 2007), ss. 5-25.

WILSON, P.W. and D.F. Graham, Saudi Arabia: The Coming Storm (New York: Sharpe Press, 1994).

YOUNG, Richard “Equitable Solutions for Offshore Boundaries: The 1968 Saudi Arabia-Iran Agreement”, The American Journal of International Law, vol. LXIV/1 (January 1970), ss. 152-157.

https://www.sipri.org/ https://www.state.gov http://www.washingtonpost.com http://fas.org http://eurasia.ro http://economist.com http://english.aawsat.com http://www.telegraph.co.uk http://www.rferl.org http://www.accessmylibrary.com http://edition.presstv.ir http://www.ft.com http://online.wsj.com http://www.guardian.co.uk http://www.iranfocus.com http://gulfnews.com http://www.bloomberg.com http://www.bbc.co.uk http://www.mofa.gov.om http://www.nytimes.com http://www.dailystar.com http://www.yjc.ir http://www.un.org http://www.hurriyet.com.tr http://english.khamenei.ir