From rival to collaborator: The curious case of resurgent nationalism in china

Bu makalede, ilk olarak Çin’deki yeniden yükselen milliyetçiliğin nedenleri ve özellikleri incelenmektedir. Bu minvalde, Çin’de 20. yüzyılın erken döneminde ortaya çıkan basitçe eski milliyetçilik diyebileceğimiz milliyetçiliğin ortaya çıkması ile Çin’de 20. yüzyılın son döneminde basitçe yeni milliyetçilik diyebileceğimiz milliyetçiliğin tekrar ortaya çıkması tartışılmakta ve iki milliyetçilik mukayese edilmektedir. Buradaki önemli bir iddia, diğer milletlere benzeme ihtiyacı ve arzusunu vurgulayan eski milliyetçiliğin amacının bir millet olmak iken milletin kendine özgü karakterini öne sürme ihtiyaç ve arzusunu vurgulayan yeni milliyetçiliğin amacının ise özgün millet haline gelmek olmasıdır. İkinci olarak, bu makale eski milliyetçiliğin 20. yüzyılın erken döneminde devletin, yani sarayın, ölümcül bir rakibi olması ama yeni milliyetçiliğin devletin, yani Komünist hükümetin, hayati bir işbirlikçisi olması meselesini ele almaktadır. Buna uygun olarak da bu oldukça şaşırtıcı dönüşümün nedenleri değerlendirilmektedir.

Rakiplikten işbirlikçiliğe: Çin'deki yeniden yükselen milliyetçiliğin ilginç vakası

In this article, first, the causes and the characteristics of the resurgent nationalism in China are examined. To that end, emergence of nationalism in China in the early 20th century, simply old nationalism, and reemergence of nationalism in China in the late 20th century, simply new nationalism, are discussed, and the two nationalisms are to be contrasted. An important argument here is that the main objective of old nationalism was to be a nation, emphasizing the need and the desire to resemble other nations, while the main objective of new nationalism is to become the nation, emphasizing the need and the desire to assert the peculiarity of the nation. Second, this article addresses the issue that while old nationalism was a fatal rival of the state, the Imperial Court, in the early 20th century, new nationalism is a vital collaborator of the state, the Communist government. Accordingly, the causes of this rather intriguing transformation are to be evaluated.

___

  • Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities, Verso, London, 1991.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt. “Soil, Blood and Identity,” The Sociological Review, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1992, pp. 675-701.
  • Billig, Michael. Banal Nationalism, Sage Publications, London, 2002.
  • Breuilly, John. Nationalism and the State, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994.
  • Dirlik, Arif. Anarchism in the Chinese Revolution, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1991.
  • Eley, Geoff and Ronald Grigor Suny (Eds.). Becoming National: A Reader, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.
  • Esherick, Joseph W. “How the Qing Became China,” in Empire to Nation: Historical Perspectives on the Making of the Modern World (Eds. Joseph W. Esherick, Hasan Kayali and Eric Van Young), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Oxford, 2006, pp. 229-259.
  • Gellner, Ernest. Nations and Nationalism, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2006. Greenfeld, Liah and Jonathan Eastwood. “National Identity,” in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (Eds. Charles Boix and Susan C. Stokes), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.
  • Hall, Stuart. “Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity’?” in Questions of Cultural Identity (Eds. Stuart Hall and Paul du Gay), Sage Publications, London, 2003, pp. 1-17.
  • Hechter, Michael. Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1999.
  • Ho, Wai-Chung. “Social Change and Nationalism in China’s Popular Songs,” Social History, Vol. 31, No. 4, November 2006, pp. 435-453.
  • Hobsbawm, Eric J. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
  • Hroch, Miroslav. Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.
  • Huang, Yasheng. “Why China will not Collapse,” Foreign Policy, No. 99, Summer 1995, pp. 54-68.
  • Hunt, Michael H. “Chinese National Identity and the Strong State: The Late Qing-Republican Crisis,” in China’s Quest for National Identity (Eds. Lowell Dittmer and Samuel S. Kim), Cornell University Press, New York, 1993, pp. 62-79.
  • Kim, Samuel S. and Lowell Dittmer. “Whither China’s Quest for National Identity?” in China’s Quest for National Identity (Eds. Lowell Dittmer and Samuel S. Kim), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1993, pp. 237–290.
  • Loden, Torbjörn. “Nationalism Transcending the State: Changing Conceptions of Chinese Identity,” in Asian Forms of the Nation (Eds. Stein Tonnesson and Hans Antlöv), Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, Surrey, 1996, pp. 270–296.
  • Nairn, Tom. The Break-up of Britain, Big Thinking, Edinburgh, 2003.
  • Özkırımlı, Ümit. Theories of Nationalism: A Critical Introduction, St. Martin’s Press New York, 2000.
  • Schwartz, Benjamin I. In Search of Wealth and Power: Yen Fu and the West, Belknap Press, USA, 1964.
  • Seckington, Ian. “Nationalism, Ideology, and China’s ‘Fourth Generation Leadership’,” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 14, No. 42, 2005, pp. 23-33.
  • Smith, Anthony D. “Theories of Nationalism: Alternative Models of Nation Formation,” in Asian Nationalism (Ed. Michael Leifer), Routledge, London, 2000, pp. 1-20.
  • Spencer, Jonathan D. The Search for Modern China, Norton & Company, New York, 1990.
  • Wu, Guoguang. “From Post-Imperial to Late Communist Nationalism: Historical Change in Chinese Nationalism from May 4th to the 1990s,” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2008, pp. 467-482.
  • Yusheng, Lin. The Crisis of Chinese Consciousness: Radical Antitraditionalism in the May Fourth Era, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1979.
  • Zhao, Suisheng. “Chinese Intellectuals’ Quest for National Greatness and Nationalistic Writing in the 1990s,” China Quarterly, No. 152, 1997, pp. 725-745.
  • Zheng, Yongnian. Discovering Chinese Nationalism in China: Modernization, Identity, and International Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.