Balkanlar'da Uluslararası Himaye Yönetimleri: Bosna-Hersek Örneği

1992-1995 yılları arasında yaşanan savaştan sonra, Bosna-Hersek barışma, yeniden yapılanma ve iktisadi dönüşüm süreçlerini eş anlı yaşamaya başlamıştır. Ancak, 1995’in sonlarında imzalanan Dayton Barış Antlaşması’nın bu ülkeye biçtiği idari yapılanma ve karar alma mekanizmaları yüzünden, söz konusu süreçler oldukça sancılı ilerlemiştir. Baştan beri Bosna-Hersek’te reformları yönlendiren ve bu ülkeye demokrasiyi dayatan, uluslararası toplumun Yüksek Temsilcilik Ofisi (OHR) olmuştur. Bu makalede, Bosna-Hersek’e kalıcı bir Avrupa perspektifinin sunulmasıyla, ülkedeki reform sürecinin hızlanacağı görüşü savunulmaktadır.

International Protectorates in the Balkans: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina

After the war of 1992-1995, Bosnia and Herzegovina commenced the peace, reconstruction and economic transformation processes simultaneously. However, due to the administrative structuring and decision-making mechanisms established by the Dayton Agreement signed towards the end of 1995, the aforementioned processes have progressed with great difficulty. From the beginning it was the Office of the High Representative of the International Community that directed the reforms and imposed democracy on Bosnia and Herzegovina. In this article it is argued that if a permanent European perspective is provided to Bosnia and Herzegovina, the reform process in the country will accelerate.

___

  • Bieber, Florian, Post-War Bosnia Ethnicity, Inequality and Public Sector Governance,İngiltere, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  • Bieber, Florian “Bosnia–Herzegovina: Developments towards a More Integrated State?” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, Cilt 22, No. 1, 2002.
  • Bildt, Carl, “Is the Peace a Success?”, Remarks to the Peace Implementation Council, Brüksel, 23 Mayıs 2000.
  • “Bosnia: Ten Years After”, Transition Online, 22 Kasım 2005, http://.www tol.cz.
  • Chandler, David, Bosnia: Faking Democracy After Dayton, 2. Baskı, London, Pluto Pres, 2000, ss. 53-62.
  • Constitutional Court of Bosnia–Herzegovina, Partial Decision, Case No. U5/98-III, 1 Temmuz 2000.
  • Cubro, Mirza, “Interview: High Representative, Paddy Ashdown: Nationalist Parties Cannot Take BiH into European Union” Nezavisne Novine, 19 Mayıs 2005.
  • Dimitrova, Svetla, “Yeni Konut Projeleri Balkanlar’daki Sürgünlere Yarayacak”, Southestern European Times, 7 Nisan 2005, http://www.setimes.com.
  • EC Council Regulation, No 2666/2000, 5 Aralık 2000.
  • Ekşi, Canan Ateş, “Birleşmiş Milletlerin Uluslararası Barış ve Güvenliğin Korumasındaki Rolü”, ayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, SBE, Ankara 1997.
  • Europa South-East Monitor, No.11, Mayıs 2000.
  • Görgülü, İsmet, Yılmaz, Veli ve Erdinç, Ali, Bosna-Hersek, İstanbul, Harp Akademileri Komutanlığı Yayınları, 1992.
  • Holbrooke, Richard, Bir Savaşı Bitirmek, Belkıs Çorakçı Dişbudak (çev.), İstanbul, İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 1999.
  • “Is Dayton Failing?: Bosnia Four Years After the Peace Agreement”. ICG Balkans Report, No. 80, Bruksel, International Crisis Group, 1999.
  • Jazbec, Milan, Defence Reform in the Western Balkans: The Way Ahead, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF), Policy Paper, Geneva, 2005.
  • Kasalak, Kadir, Milli Mücadele’de Manda ve Himaye Meselesi, Ankara, Genel Kurmay Basımevi, 1993.
  • Kett, Maria E, “Internally Displaced Peoples in Bosnia- Herzegovina: Impacts of Long term Displacement on Health and Well-being” Medicine, Conflict And Survival, Cilt 21, No. 3, 2005, ss. 199- 215.
  • Key Figures of ICTY Cases, 15 Mayıs 2008, http://www.un.org/icty/glance/ index.htm.
  • Knaus, Gerald “Debate: Does the international presence in the Balkans require radical restructuring?” Nato Review, Kış 2005.
  • Kovac, Janez “Bosnia’s British Bulldozer” Interntional War and Peace Report , No. 383, 18 Kasım 2002.
  • One Millionth Returnee Goes Home In Bosnia & Herzegovina, 21 Eylül 2004, http://www.unhcr.ba/press/2004pr/210904.htm.
  • PIC Decisions, http://www.internationalmediator.de/html/pic_1995. html.
  • “Politicians Discuss Possibility of Bosnia Being Organized in Three Entities”, HINA News, 20 Ağustos 2004.
  • Praso, Murat, Demographic Consequences of the 1992-95 War, Mart-Nisan 1996, http://www.barnsdle.demon.co.uk/bosnia/dem.html.
  • Pugh, Michael ve Cobble, Margaret, “Non-Nationalist Voting in Bosnian Municipal Implications for Democracy and Peacebuilding” Journal of Peace Research, Cilt 38, No. 1, 2001, ss. 27-47.
  • “Reshaping International Priorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Part Three: The End of the Nationalist Regimes and the Future of the Bosnian State”, ESI Report, Berlin, Brüksel, Saraybosna, 22 Mart 2001.
  • “The Return of Refugees and Displaced People as a Precondition for the Survival of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, International Forum Bosnia, Saraybosna, Mart 1999.
  • Review Of The UNHCR Housing Programme In Bosnia And Herzegovina Inspection and Evaluation Service, Kasım 1998.
  • Toal, Gerard, “Embedding Bosnia-Herzegovina in Euro-Structures: From Dayton to Brussels” Eurasian Geography and Economics, Cilt 46, No. 1, Ocak 2005, ss. 51-67.
  • UN Doc. S/24111-UN Doc. A/47/277 1992
  • UN Security Council Resolution, S/RES/827, 25 Mayıs 1993.
  • “US wraps up military program in Bosnia-Herzegovina”, RFE/RL Newsline Southeastern Europe, 31 Ekim 2002.
  • Venice Commission Report- CDL-AD(2005) 004.
  • Zagreb Summit, Final Declaration, 4 Kasım 2000, http://faq.macedonia. org/politics/eu/zagreb.summit.pdf.